| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Big Rob
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Posts: 3581
Location: Long Beach, Ca
|
 Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:03 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| CharlieKelly wrote: | Pretty much guarantees the Chiefs playing mostly Man/Bump-and-Run(which is what we're more suited for) I pray at least.
| Big_Palooka wrote: | | And they what? Routt goes inside where he's hot garbage? |
Why does it have to be Routt that is moved inside? Why not Flowers or Carr?
I think Flowers could be Woodson-esque in the slot. |
If that's the plan, I see that working out well...but Routt doesn't belong anywhere near the slot or zone... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Frank Costello
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 10024
Location: in 2009, Vikings>Saints
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RaiderFanSD wrote: | Chiefs got worse IMO, but they were smart about it if they were never going to re-sign Carr anyway
John Clayton@ClaytonESPNReply
With more than $52 million of contracts tied up in CBs Brandon Flowers and Stanford Routt, expect KC to let Brandon Carr walk |
That's how I see it. They know Carr is going to leave to go be 'the guy' somewhere else, so they got a back up plan in Routt. They didn't get better, but they protected themselves from getting worse and thin at CB.
_________________
2017 - In Zimmer We Trust.
| FootballProdiG wrote: | | I see Minnesota falling off the map this year just like they did in the second half of the season. |
#5strong |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CharlieKelly
Joined: 26 Jan 2012
Posts: 109
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| dante9876 wrote: |
Flowers has problems with guys with speed. Why would you want him in the slot? |
See: LONG Speed, his short area quickness is tops in the league(a hundredth of a second slower then Revis' 10 yard split) so I don't see an issue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bpinsky33
Joined: 04 Feb 2005
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Frank Costello wrote: | | RaiderFanSD wrote: | Chiefs got worse IMO, but they were smart about it if they were never going to re-sign Carr anyway
John Clayton@ClaytonESPNReply
With more than $52 million of contracts tied up in CBs Brandon Flowers and Stanford Routt, expect KC to let Brandon Carr walk |
That's how I see it. They know Carr is going to leave to go be 'the guy' somewhere else, so they got a back up plan in Routt. They didn't get better, but they protected themselves from getting worse and thin at CB. |
Why couldn't the Chiefs Tag Carr then trade him? I'm not sure what his value would be, but you could imagine they could get a 2nd rounder (I don't think a first is realistic).
_________________
 .
What I would have done.
1) Fisher, 3a) Keenan Allen, 3b) Shamarko Thomas, 4) Nico Johnson, 5) Stepfan Taylor, 6a) Nick Kasa, 6b) Taylor Bray, 7) Joe Kruger |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
norcalraider510
Joined: 12 Feb 2011
Posts: 6376
Location: The Itty Bitty City By The Water
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Carr is probably gone. Hes coming to Oakland 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skatebeanz
Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 20036
Location: Jamison. on the Sweet-sig.
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bpinsky33 wrote: | | Why couldn't the Chiefs Tag Carr then trade him? I'm not sure what his value would be, but you could imagine they could get a 2nd rounder (I don't think a first is realistic). |
I think the league frowns on that. I know I have heard that it is not intended for that. Second, If no team wants to pay that amount (I'd assume near 10 Mill) then the Chiefs are stuck with it.
_________________
Future of our economy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BayArea07
Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 23215
Location: 8*3*1
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| dante9876 wrote: | | CharlieKelly wrote: | Pretty much guarantees the Chiefs playing mostly Man/Bump-and-Run(which is what we're more suited for) I pray at least.
| Big_Palooka wrote: | | And they what? Routt goes inside where he's hot garbage? |
Why does it have to be Routt that is moved inside? Why not Flowers or Carr?
I think Flowers could be Woodson-esque in the slot. |
Flowers has problems with guys with speed. Why would you want him in the slot? |
... 
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lomaxgr
Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Posts: 21535
Location: Manchester, England
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Sigh ... Wanted him out of the AFC West. I am a big fan of Routt's. Love his competitve, aggressive nature and I think he is one of the better man coverage CB's in the NFL.
_________________
MUFC OK |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Desmond
Joined: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 10602
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SilverNBlackFan wrote: | | Imagine if the Chiefs find a way to resign Brandon Carr. That would be the best CB trio in the league. |
Flowers + Carr + Arenas + Routt. Sick.
I don't expect it to happen though. 
_________________
[quote="KingofSTATS"]Healthy Gates >>>> Anyone to play the TE/WR position, ever.[/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CharlieKelly
Joined: 26 Jan 2012
Posts: 109
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| skatebeanz wrote: | | bpinsky33 wrote: | | Why couldn't the Chiefs Tag Carr then trade him? I'm not sure what his value would be, but you could imagine they could get a 2nd rounder (I don't think a first is realistic). |
I think the league frowns on that. I know I have heard that it is not intended for that. Second, If no team wants to pay that amount (I'd assume near 10 Mill) then the Chiefs are stuck with it. |
That's exactly what the Patriots did to the Chiefs with Cassel, and Jared Allen left KC in a similar fashion.
From the GM Pioli's presser:
"We are excited that we were able to come to terms with Stanford," General Manager Scott Pioli said. "He is a talented player, and as we have said in the past, we are always looking to add competition at every position year-round. Stanford’s experience and level of play will make him a solid addition to our defense."
Is this eluding to keeping Carr? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
skatebeanz
Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 20036
Location: Jamison. on the Sweet-sig.
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CharlieKelly wrote: | | That's exactly what the Patriots did to the Chiefs with Cassel, and Jared Allen left KC in a similar fashion. |
Well then I guess it can't be frowned upon.
I didn't say you are not allowed to. I said it is frowned upon.
_________________
Future of our economy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Freakout
Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 4213
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bpinsky33 wrote: | | Frank Costello wrote: | | RaiderFanSD wrote: | Chiefs got worse IMO, but they were smart about it if they were never going to re-sign Carr anyway
John Clayton@ClaytonESPNReply
With more than $52 million of contracts tied up in CBs Brandon Flowers and Stanford Routt, expect KC to let Brandon Carr walk |
That's how I see it. They know Carr is going to leave to go be 'the guy' somewhere else, so they got a back up plan in Routt. They didn't get better, but they protected themselves from getting worse and thin at CB. |
Why couldn't the Chiefs Tag Carr then trade him? I'm not sure what his value would be, but you could imagine they could get a 2nd rounder (I don't think a first is realistic). |
And risk losing Bowe? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Its A Sabotage
Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 38179
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Bad news for teams needing a Receiver...Means they will likely F-Tag Bowe (also rumor that Stevie gets Tagged too).
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EliteTexan80
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 38266
Location: Three time Mr. fanTASTic!
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Its A Sabotage wrote: | | Bad news for teams needing a Receiver...Means they will likely F-Tag Bowe (also rumor that Stevie gets Tagged too). |
If both Johnson and Bowe are tagged...that means the asking price for the likes of Vincent Jackson, Mario Manningham, Robert Meachem, DeSean Jackson, Marquis Colston and Reggie Wayne just went up.
Bowe was considered one of the top three FA WRs (Depending on where you'd rank either one of the Jacksons or Wayne) and him being plucked off the market means that the asking price went up for one of the bigger names. Same for Johnson, who stood to make a lot of money on the open market.
I think the interesting money is going to be for Manningham, who is fresh off of one of the most difficult catches on the last drive of the biggest game of his life. He's been productive for the most part, and that grab showed that he can be depended on to make a big play when the game is on the line. Even though he's not the most talented name on the list, he's probably due a bigger deal than more talented players, just because of that play.
_________________
| vike daddy wrote: | | EliteTexan80 wrote: | | I wanna be a mod. |
vastly over rated. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kparty69
Joined: 03 Mar 2008
Posts: 1276
Location: Minnesota/Ohio
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CharlieKelly wrote: | | dante9876 wrote: |
Flowers has problems with guys with speed. Why would you want him in the slot? |
See: LONG Speed, his short area quickness is tops in the league(a hundredth of a second slower then Revis' 10 yard split) so I don't see an issue. |
Revis has no business playing in the slot, he's much better on the outside. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
