| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Blahman88
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 21768
Location: DA BRITUSH IZLES
|
 Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:04 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| UKEaglesFan wrote: | $18.5 million on Romo and $5.9 on Orton!
< 100mill for the rest of the roster! |
And in Mr Carr Carr
_________________
^Officially endorsed by Jon Dorenbos
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | I would do the same but I know better then to start beef with the EBB. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Texas_OutLaw7
Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 19350
Location: Cowboys Forum ROH Class of '12
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| UKEaglesFan wrote: | $18.5 million on Romo and $5.9 on Orton!
< 100mill for the rest of the roster! |
That's actually not how it works. Orton salary is 900k. Got a signing bonus of 5m. His hit is 1.9.....
_________________
In Redball I Trust!
The price of progress is trusting the process.
Heart. Leadership. Passion. Will. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UKEaglesFan
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 8998
Location: Coruscant, Somewhere In A Galaxy Far Far Away
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Texas_OutLaw7 wrote: | | UKEaglesFan wrote: | $18.5 million on Romo and $5.9 on Orton!
< 100mill for the rest of the roster! |
That's actually not how it works. Orton salary is 900k. Got a signing bonus of 5m. His hit is 1.9..... |
I had read it was the whole thing, my mistake, ok so 2.5 million then with 900k and 5mill split over 3 years.
20 mill on the QBs.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
birdman0069
Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 6049
Location: Key West, FL
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| UKEaglesFan wrote: | They are going to sue it seems.
Which could be fun! |
No way JJ would dare sue. He'll never see another Super Bowl in Dalas as long as he is the owner.
_________________
Props to Eagles _808 on the sig.
PE, the new poster child for birth control.
Birdman, slowest to 10K |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
UKEaglesFan
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 8998
Location: Coruscant, Somewhere In A Galaxy Far Far Away
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't think that's even the biggest issue.
If they were to sue, it would prove that the NFL owners were in collusion while the locked out was happening.......all hell will then break loose.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonu62882
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 18416
Location: Philadelphia, PA
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| UKEaglesFan wrote: | I don't think that's even the biggest issue.
If they were to sue, it would prove that the NFL owners were in collusion while the locked out was happening.......all hell will then break loose. |
Not necessarily...it's not as "open and shut" like the bloggers have reported; it's all very technical and arguable...and even if it was decided it was collusion, NLFPA couldn't do anything about it now as they have no right to a claim as they gave up all future legal claims in a bargained-for settlement agreement for the new CBA. All that would do is give them future ammo for the next CBA negotiations, and that wouldn't necessarily prove anything in a prima facie way, i.e. not establishing some pattern of collusion on the NFL's part; it would just be evidence of a one-time occurrence.
But yeah, smart move would be to take it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blahman88
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 21768
Location: DA BRITUSH IZLES
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jonu62882 wrote: | | UKEaglesFan wrote: | I don't think that's even the biggest issue.
If they were to sue, it would prove that the NFL owners were in collusion while the locked out was happening.......all hell will then break loose. |
Not necessarily...it's not as "open and shut" like the bloggers have reported; it's all very technical and arguable...and even if it was decided it was collusion, NLFPA couldn't do anything about it now as they have no right to a claim as they gave it up in a bargained-for settlement agreement for the new CBA. All that would do is give them future ammo for the next CBA negotiations, and that wouldn't necessarily prove anything in a prima facie way, i.e. not establishing some pattern of collusion on the NFL's part; it would just be evidence of a one-time occurrence.
But yeah, smart move would be to take it. |
What are you? A Lawyer? I think NFL General will give a better answer than you.....#trolltolltroll
_________________
^Officially endorsed by Jon Dorenbos
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | I would do the same but I know better then to start beef with the EBB. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Matts4313
Joined: 08 Dec 2004
Posts: 30416
Location: Cowboys Forum ROH Class of 12
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| UKEaglesFan wrote: | | Texas_OutLaw7 wrote: | | UKEaglesFan wrote: | $18.5 million on Romo and $5.9 on Orton!
< 100mill for the rest of the roster! |
That's actually not how it works. Orton salary is 900k. Got a signing bonus of 5m. His hit is 1.9..... |
I had read it was the whole thing, my mistake, ok so 2.5 million then with 900k and 5mill split over 3 years.
20 mill on the QBs. |
It was a 5 year contract. His cap is 1.9
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonu62882
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 18416
Location: Philadelphia, PA
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Blahman88 wrote: | | jonu62882 wrote: | | UKEaglesFan wrote: | I don't think that's even the biggest issue.
If they were to sue, it would prove that the NFL owners were in collusion while the locked out was happening.......all hell will then break loose. |
Not necessarily...it's not as "open and shut" like the bloggers have reported; it's all very technical and arguable...and even if it was decided it was collusion, NLFPA couldn't do anything about it now as they have no right to a claim as they gave it up in a bargained-for settlement agreement for the new CBA. All that would do is give them future ammo for the next CBA negotiations, and that wouldn't necessarily prove anything in a prima facie way, i.e. not establishing some pattern of collusion on the NFL's part; it would just be evidence of a one-time occurrence.
But yeah, smart move would be to take it. |
What are you? A Lawyer? I think NFL General will give a better answer than you.....#trolltolltroll |
Nah, son, cawped that Law & Order box set from Best Buy...on sale $39.99! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ianlewis16
Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 23077
Location: Proud Eagles Forum First Ballot HOF Member
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Matts4313 wrote: | | UKEaglesFan wrote: | | Texas_OutLaw7 wrote: | | UKEaglesFan wrote: | $18.5 million on Romo and $5.9 on Orton!
< 100mill for the rest of the roster! |
That's actually not how it works. Orton salary is 900k. Got a signing bonus of 5m. His hit is 1.9..... |
I had read it was the whole thing, my mistake, ok so 2.5 million then with 900k and 5mill split over 3 years.
20 mill on the QBs. |
It was a 5 year contract. His cap is 1.9 |
Old news from the old man
_________________
| Kempes wrote: | | There's Eastern Time, there's Greenwich Mean Time and then there's ianlewis time. |
| Blahman88 wrote: | | I control the EBB.......except Ian, no body can control him |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EaglesFan5-36-81
Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 13994
Location: Sig by Eagles_808
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Rex Grossman is RG3's mentor and backup...I kinda feel bad for the kid, pretty bad receiving corps (Garcon and Morgan aren't special despite their salary), pretty bad OL, no picks or cap to build or add more, he's gonna have to put the team on his back.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
babyatemydingo
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 5901
Location: South Jersey
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| EaglesFan5-36-81 wrote: | | Rex Grossman is RG3's mentor and backup...I kinda feel bad for the kid, pretty bad receiving corps (Garcon and Morgan aren't special despite their salary), pretty bad OL, no picks or cap to build or add more, he's gonna have to put the team on his back. |
Bringing in David Garrard or Mark Brunell would make sense.
But, knowing the Redskins, they'll sign Vince Young. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PowerElite
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 7624
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jonu62882 wrote: | | UKEaglesFan wrote: | I don't think that's even the biggest issue.
If they were to sue, it would prove that the NFL owners were in collusion while the locked out was happening.......all hell will then break loose. |
Not necessarily...it's not as "open and shut" like the bloggers have reported; it's all very technical and arguable...and even if it was decided it was collusion, NLFPA couldn't do anything about it now as they have no right to a claim as they gave up all future legal claims in a bargained-for settlement agreement for the new CBA. All that would do is give them future ammo for the next CBA negotiations, and that wouldn't necessarily prove anything in a prima facie way, i.e. not establishing some pattern of collusion on the NFL's part; it would just be evidence of a one-time occurrence.
But yeah, smart move would be to take it. |
Obviously you stayed at the Holiday Inn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jonu62882
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 18416
Location: Philadelphia, PA
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 10:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PowerElite wrote: | | jonu62882 wrote: | | UKEaglesFan wrote: | I don't think that's even the biggest issue.
If they were to sue, it would prove that the NFL owners were in collusion while the locked out was happening.......all hell will then break loose. |
Not necessarily...it's not as "open and shut" like the bloggers have reported; it's all very technical and arguable...and even if it was decided it was collusion, NLFPA couldn't do anything about it now as they have no right to a claim as they gave up all future legal claims in a bargained-for settlement agreement for the new CBA. All that would do is give them future ammo for the next CBA negotiations, and that wouldn't necessarily prove anything in a prima facie way, i.e. not establishing some pattern of collusion on the NFL's part; it would just be evidence of a one-time occurrence.
But yeah, smart move would be to take it. |
Obviously you stayed at the Holiday Inn. |
Is this a reference to a commercial or a movie?
'Cause this isn't first time that I've heard that, but I don't where that is from...any clips? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PowerElite
Joined: 25 Dec 2009
Posts: 7624
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jonu62882 wrote: | | PowerElite wrote: | | jonu62882 wrote: | | UKEaglesFan wrote: | I don't think that's even the biggest issue.
If they were to sue, it would prove that the NFL owners were in collusion while the locked out was happening.......all hell will then break loose. |
Not necessarily...it's not as "open and shut" like the bloggers have reported; it's all very technical and arguable...and even if it was decided it was collusion, NLFPA couldn't do anything about it now as they have no right to a claim as they gave up all future legal claims in a bargained-for settlement agreement for the new CBA. All that would do is give them future ammo for the next CBA negotiations, and that wouldn't necessarily prove anything in a prima facie way, i.e. not establishing some pattern of collusion on the NFL's part; it would just be evidence of a one-time occurrence.
But yeah, smart move would be to take it. |
Obviously you stayed at the Holiday Inn. |
Is this a reference to a commercial or a movie?
'Cause this isn't first time that I've heard that, but I don't where that is from...any clips? |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8Ah8WTL2i8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlCLuIwuVgQ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
