Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

4 Reasons why the Vikings WILL draft Claiborne.
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19 ... 44, 45, 46  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Minnesota Vikings
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Do the Vikings have to draft Claiborne now?
No
79%
 79%  [ 57 ]
Yes
20%
 20%  [ 15 ]
Total Votes : 72

Author Message
wcblack34


Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 4021
Location: Anywhere but Wisconsin.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

this providence wrote:
Funny to see the list. Wonder why those teams are drafting where they are after selecting those tackles where they did...

wcblack wrote:
Finally, the lack of interest which you claim would also cast the same exact doubt on Blackmon and Claiborne, because if nobody is calling to trade up, they obviously don't think much of those two either.


Indeed. Like I've said repeatedly this offseason, this draft is so poor at the top. Especially with the more bandied about players. Would still much prefer to take a difference making player than a tackle, though. Claiborne, Blackmon, Floyd, DeCastro, Brockers, and Coples would all be players I'd take in advance of Kalil.


Cleveland - Colt McCoy
Tampa - Josh Freeman
St. Louis - Sam Bradford
Jacksonville - Blaine Gabbert
Miami - Matt Moore
Carolina - Cam Newton
Buffalo - Ryan Fitzpatrick
Kansas City - Matt Cassel/Palko
Seattle - T-Jack/Whitehurst
Arizona - Kevin Kolb
Dallas - Tony Romo
Philadelphia - Mike Vick
New York Jets - Mark Sanchez

I'd say that explains a bit more about draft position than who is playing LT.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Purple Faithful


Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 2688
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wcblack34 wrote:
this providence wrote:
Funny to see the list. Wonder why those teams are drafting where they are after selecting those tackles where they did...

wcblack wrote:
Finally, the lack of interest which you claim would also cast the same exact doubt on Blackmon and Claiborne, because if nobody is calling to trade up, they obviously don't think much of those two either.


Indeed. Like I've said repeatedly this offseason, this draft is so poor at the top. Especially with the more bandied about players. Would still much prefer to take a difference making player than a tackle, though. Claiborne, Blackmon, Floyd, DeCastro, Brockers, and Coples would all be players I'd take in advance of Kalil.


Cleveland - Colt McCoy
Tampa - Josh Freeman
St. Louis - Sam Bradford
Jacksonville - Blaine Gabbert
Miami - Matt Moore
Carolina - Cam Newton
Buffalo - Ryan Fitzpatrick
Kansas City - Matt Cassel/Palko
Seattle - T-Jack/Whitehurst
Arizona - Kevin Kolb
Dallas - Tony Romo
Philadelphia - Mike Vick
New York Jets - Mark Sanchez

I'd say that explains a bit more about draft position than who is playing LT.
Always does, too. Worrying about LT is what losers do.

* oh, I mean loser GM's/organizations. We're just fans, we don't become winners or losers based on our team's success. Sorry if any take my comment as an attack. I didn't mean it as an affront to anyone, but maybe Bill Parcells for forgetting what made him a winner.
_________________
Remember when the Vikings passed on Dan Marino because we had Tommy Kramer? ahhh, good times.
2012 Viking Fan:
Draft like Jimmie Johnson=bad (2 QB's)
Draft like Jerry Jones=good (take an OT top10)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
this providence


Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 10971
Location: Ugh.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wcblack34 wrote:
I'd say that explains a bit more about draft position than who is playing LT.


Absolutely. Maybe they should be using high picks on QBs and difference makers instead. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Purplexing


Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 3679
Location: Outside Valhalla, looking in.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

this providence wrote:
wcblack34 wrote:
Not really, it speaks more to the needs of the teams within striking distance of the top 5 picks.


If he was really a once in a decade type of prospect that some claim him to be and LT was really a position that some make it out to be, teams would be chomping at the bit to trade up to get him where ever they are in the draft. Much like Washington moving up for RGIII. And when you consider the Vikings are literally begging to move down and there's been zero interest in the pick, with some even going so far as to wonder if a team would trade up for an average QB prospect like Tannehill at #3, it further reinforces my opinion on the player and position.


Few people would call Kalil a once in a decade prospect. Maybe twice in a decade?; i.e. two such quality LTs might be available in a decade.

Teams that are within striking distance, which would not have to yield a huge bounty, might be interested. But the Supply-Demand dynamic is that there aren't many such teams close to pick 3 except MN and maybe St.L.

Anything Washington does is not to be considered normal. But in this case, they badly need a QBOTF, which they've missed for several years.

Zero interest in the pick? We won't know for certain until it is made.
_________________

When we stop to think about it, most folks behavior isn't perplexing after all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
this providence


Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 10971
Location: Ugh.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Still replying to posts to say nothing at all. Yawn.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wcblack34


Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 4021
Location: Anywhere but Wisconsin.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

this providence wrote:
wcblack34 wrote:
I'd say that explains a bit more about draft position than who is playing LT.


Absolutely. Maybe they should be using high picks on QBs and difference makers instead. Very Happy


You mean difference makers like Troy Williamson, Deangelo Hall, Reggie Williams, Charles Rogers, Roy Williams, David Terrell, Braylon Edwards, Cedric Benson, Mike Williams, Ted Ginn Jr., Darius Heyward Bey, C.J. Spiller, Reggie Bush, Ronnie Brown, Cadillac Williams, Antrell Rolle, Carlos Rogers, and Michael Crabtree?

If you're talking Calvin Johnson, Andre Johnson, Julio Jones, A.J. Green, then I agree with you. However, there are no such talents in this draft.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PurpleMugen


Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 3638
Location: Rutgers University
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wcblack34 wrote:
this providence wrote:
wcblack34 wrote:
I'd say that explains a bit more about draft position than who is playing LT.


Absolutely. Maybe they should be using high picks on QBs and difference makers instead. Very Happy


You mean difference makers like Troy Williamson, Deangelo Hall, Reggie Williams, Charles Rogers, Roy Williams, David Terrell, Braylon Edwards, Cedric Benson, Mike Williams, Ted Ginn Jr., Darius Heyward Bey, C.J. Spiller, Reggie Bush, Ronnie Brown, Cadillac Williams, Antrell Rolle, Carlos Rogers, and Michael Crabtree?

If you're talking Calvin Johnson, Andre Johnson, Julio Jones, A.J. Green, then I agree with you. However, there are no such talents in this draft.


...

Or perhaps he means difference makers like Larry Fitzgerald, Joe Haden, Eric Berry, Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, Mario Williams, Vernon Davis, Darren McFadden, Matt Ryan, B. J. Raji, Ndamukong Suh and Adrian Peterson.
_________________

Peppers90 on the sig.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wcblack34


Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 4021
Location: Anywhere but Wisconsin.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PurpleMugen wrote:
wcblack34 wrote:
this providence wrote:
wcblack34 wrote:
I'd say that explains a bit more about draft position than who is playing LT.


Absolutely. Maybe they should be using high picks on QBs and difference makers instead. Very Happy


You mean difference makers like Troy Williamson, Deangelo Hall, Reggie Williams, Charles Rogers, Roy Williams, David Terrell, Braylon Edwards, Cedric Benson, Mike Williams, Ted Ginn Jr., Darius Heyward Bey, C.J. Spiller, Reggie Bush, Ronnie Brown, Cadillac Williams, Antrell Rolle, Carlos Rogers, and Michael Crabtree?

If you're talking Calvin Johnson, Andre Johnson, Julio Jones, A.J. Green, then I agree with you. However, there are no such talents in this draft.


...

Or perhaps he means difference makers like Larry Fitzgerald, Joe Haden, Eric Berry, Eli Manning, Philip Rivers, Mario Williams, Vernon Davis, Darren McFadden, Matt Ryan, B. J. Raji, Ndamukong Suh and Adrian Peterson.


Yep. And there are none of those types in this draft, with the possible exception of Claiborne and Richardson. We already have Adrian Peterson, so that makes Richardson obsolete. Claiborne is not a Cover 2 Cornerback, and despite the protests of certain members of this board, there is no evidence that the Vikings will be using less Cover 2. Just gut feelings. A LT like Kalil can play in any blocking scheme.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
this providence


Joined: 28 Dec 2006
Posts: 10971
Location: Ugh.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wcblack34 wrote:
Yep. And there are none of those types in this draft


A bit grandiose, eh?

I don't like this draft much either but there's absolutely a few guys who likely will be proving many people wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wcblack34


Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 4021
Location: Anywhere but Wisconsin.
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

this providence wrote:
wcblack34 wrote:
Yep. And there are none of those types in this draft


A bit grandiose, eh?



I think you're stretching to misconstrue what I've written, but I'll clarify.

There are no WR or DT prospects like Calvin Johnson, Andre Johnson, or N-Whats-his-name Suh, where you knew they were Top 5 picks who were very likely to live up to their draft status. You have Blackmon, who is a tad on the short side for a Top 5 WR, and there are questions about whether he can be the deep threat that teams generally look for in a WR who is picked that high. Poe and Brockers have serious questions about whether their immense measurables will translate into success at the next level. I haven't found anyone who has argued that Michael Floyd is a Calvin Johnson, A.J. Green, or Julio Jones type prospect.

While many of this year's players may prove everyone wrong, at this point, most seem to feel the top-end talent is 5 deep, maybe 6.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Flounda


Joined: 14 Mar 2012
Posts: 87
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I actually feel quite different about this draft class. I believe that this draft class is one of the best over the past 10 years.

Andrew Luck is the best college prospect in the history of the game.

Robert Griffin according to everyone is better than Cam Newton and a Sam Bradford(I actually don't like Griffin)

Matt Kalil who, inn many eyes, is the best left tackle prospect since Orlando Pace.

This cornerback class is unreal, Stephon Gilmore and Robinson would both have gone first round last year.

Many of the people that will be drafted in the second round would have been drafted first round last year.

Justin Blackmon is a much better prospect than Julio Jones with the exception of the height.

Overall many players in this years second round or could have gone 1st round over the past two years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Vikefan79


Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 25462
Location: Atlanta
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flounda wrote:
I actually feel quite different about this draft class. I believe that this draft class is one of the best over the past 10 years.

Andrew Luck is the best college prospect in the history of the game.

Robert Griffin according to everyone is better than Cam Newton and a Sam Bradford(I actually don't like Griffin)

Matt Kalil who, inn many eyes, is the best left tackle prospect since Orlando Pace.

This cornerback class is unreal, Stephon Gilmore and Robinson would both have gone first round last year.

Many of the people that will be drafted in the second round would have been drafted first round last year.

Justin Blackmon is a much better prospect than Julio Jones with the exception of the height.

Overall many players in this years second round or could have gone 1st round over the past two years.



Agree in bold I do not
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vikingsrule


Moderator
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 39756
Location: Land of 10,000 Lakes!
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flounda wrote:
I actually feel quite different about this draft class. I believe that this draft class is one of the best over the past 10 years.

Andrew Luck is the best college prospect in the history of the game.

Robert Griffin according to everyone is better than Cam Newton and a Sam Bradford(I actually don't like Griffin)

Matt Kalil who, inn many eyes, is the best left tackle prospect since Orlando Pace.

This cornerback class is unreal, Stephon Gilmore and Robinson would both have gone first round last year.

Many of the people that will be drafted in the second round would have been drafted first round last year.

Justin Blackmon is a much better prospect than Julio Jones with the exception of the height.

Overall many players in this years second round or could have gone 1st round over the past two years.


speed and vertical ball skills, Jones blows Blackmon away. Wink

Blackmon would be ranked below Julio Jones and AJ Green if they were all in the same class, without debate.

Overall this is a solid class, probably not as good as last year, but still pretty good. The QBs really pull this class up a bit, but last year, there were so many more true impact defensive players in the top 10.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PurpleMugen


Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Posts: 3638
Location: Rutgers University
PostPosted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

wcblack34 wrote:
this providence wrote:
wcblack34 wrote:
Yep. And there are none of those types in this draft


A bit grandiose, eh?



I think you're stretching to misconstrue what I've written, but I'll clarify.

There are no WR or DT prospects like Calvin Johnson, Andre Johnson, or N-Whats-his-name Suh, where you knew they were Top 5 picks who were very likely to live up to their draft status. You have Blackmon, who is a tad on the short side for a Top 5 WR, and there are questions about whether he can be the deep threat that teams generally look for in a WR who is picked that high. Poe and Brockers have serious questions about whether their immense measurables will translate into success at the next level. I haven't found anyone who has argued that Michael Floyd is a Calvin Johnson, A.J. Green, or Julio Jones type prospect.

While many of this year's players may prove everyone wrong, at this point, most seem to feel the top-end talent is 5 deep, maybe 6.


I don't get the vibe he was "stretching to misconstrue" anything. If this is what you actually meant to write, your initial post is poorly worded. Either way, your point doesn't impress much regardless, since the success of players in the NFL is not tied merely to what 'level of prospect' they are, but rather to a combination of factors like quality of coaching received, degree of support from teammates, etc.
_________________

Peppers90 on the sig.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Purple Faithful


Joined: 11 Mar 2009
Posts: 2688
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, I think you guys are not checking out Fletcher Cox. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puY2BKGgX0Q I think he's gonna be a great pass rusher, probably for St. Louis or Carolina. Sad
_________________
Remember when the Vikings passed on Dan Marino because we had Tommy Kramer? ahhh, good times.
2012 Viking Fan:
Draft like Jimmie Johnson=bad (2 QB's)
Draft like Jerry Jones=good (take an OT top10)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Minnesota Vikings All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19 ... 44, 45, 46  Next
Page 18 of 46

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group