Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Raider News: Odds and Ends
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
DOCLEW 28


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10587
Location: East Oakland
PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 9:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JTagg7754 wrote:
Yep a tackle 4 yards pass the LoS is a determining factor in a player's worth and shows he has complete control over whiffing and gap discipline. I see it now.

Thanks!


Is this your "adult" explanation as to why tackels are worthless stats when talking of a defensive player's value??? Seriously??? You are going to have to do a better job of explaining this one. I can't wait to hear this. Rolling Eyes
_________________

Raider X hooked me with the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JTagg7754


Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7252
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DOCLEW 28 wrote:
JTagg7754 wrote:
Yep a tackle 4 yards pass the LoS is a determining factor in a player's worth and shows he has complete control over whiffing and gap discipline. I see it now.

Thanks!


Is this your "adult" explanation as to why tackels are worthless stats when talking of a defensive player's value??? Seriously??? You are going to have to do a better job of explaining this one. I can't wait to hear this. Rolling Eyes


No it's me mocking you. I can't take anyone seriously who thinks tackles are a stat to judge a player's worth. That's just silly. I am talking to a "coach" I shouldn't need to explain that.
_________________

NCOUGHMAN wrote:
Quote:

you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs?

not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmac505


Joined: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 621
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JTagg7754 wrote:
DOCLEW 28 wrote:
JTagg7754 wrote:
Yep a tackle 4 yards pass the LoS is a determining factor in a player's worth and shows he has complete control over whiffing and gap discipline. I see it now.

Thanks!


Is this your "adult" explanation as to why tackels are worthless stats when talking of a defensive player's value??? Seriously??? You are going to have to do a better job of explaining this one. I can't wait to hear this. Rolling Eyes


No it's me mocking you. I can't take anyone seriously who thinks tackles are a stat to judge a player's worth. That's just silly. I am talking to a "coach" I shouldn't need to explain that.


no stat is great for judging how a player played...
however, i think tackles for MLB does have value.

obviously you need to do more than just have a lot of tackles to be great.. but it is very tough to be great without tackles.
its kind of the basic premise of defense, tackle the ball carrier.
_________________


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JTagg7754


Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7252
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dmac505 wrote:
no stat is great for judging how a player played...
however, i think tackles for MLB does have value.

obviously you need to do more than just have a lot of tackles to be great.. but it is very tough to be great without tackles.
its kind of the basic premise of defense, tackle the ball carrier.


Completely agree, tackles are definitely a measuring stick but I believe it's the bottom of the totem poll. Kirk Morrison says I'm right also.

If we were to elaborate and say tackles of < 1 yard, I would suggest it's significantly more important. Unfortunately though, I don't know of any sites that break tackles down like that. I'm sure there are some and I possibly could have seen them. Just nothing coming to mind.
_________________

NCOUGHMAN wrote:
Quote:

you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs?

not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
dmac505


Joined: 07 Aug 2008
Posts: 621
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 10:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JTagg7754 wrote:
dmac505 wrote:
no stat is great for judging how a player played...
however, i think tackles for MLB does have value.

obviously you need to do more than just have a lot of tackles to be great.. but it is very tough to be great without tackles.
its kind of the basic premise of defense, tackle the ball carrier.


Completely agree, tackles are definitely a measuring stick but I believe it's the bottom of the totem poll. Kirk Morrison says I'm right also.

If we were to elaborate and say tackles of < 1 yard, I would suggest it's significantly more important. Unfortunately though, I don't know of any sites that break tackles down like that. I'm sure there are some and I possibly could have seen them. Just nothing coming to mind.


i agree with that.
i thought you were just stating tackles didnt matter, good to know i was wrong Laughing
_________________


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NCOUGHMAN


Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12592
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JTagg7754 wrote:
dmac505 wrote:
no stat is great for judging how a player played...
however, i think tackles for MLB does have value.

obviously you need to do more than just have a lot of tackles to be great.. but it is very tough to be great without tackles.
its kind of the basic premise of defense, tackle the ball carrier.


Completely agree, tackles are definitely a measuring stick but I believe it's the bottom of the totem poll. Kirk Morrison says I'm right also.

If we were to elaborate and say tackles of < 1 yard, I would suggest it's significantly more important. Unfortunately though, I don't know of any sites that break tackles down like that. I'm sure there are some and I possibly could have seen them. Just nothing coming to mind.


tackles for loss are my fav stats for LB's.
_________________


green24 wrote:
NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DOCLEW 28


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10587
Location: East Oakland
PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

dmac505 wrote:
JTagg7754 wrote:
dmac505 wrote:
no stat is great for judging how a player played...
however, i think tackles for MLB does have value.

obviously you need to do more than just have a lot of tackles to be great.. but it is very tough to be great without tackles.
its kind of the basic premise of defense, tackle the ball carrier.


Completely agree, tackles are definitely a measuring stick but I believe it's the bottom of the totem poll. Kirk Morrison says I'm right also.

If we were to elaborate and say tackles of < 1 yard, I would suggest it's significantly more important. Unfortunately though, I don't know of any sites that break tackles down like that. I'm sure there are some and I possibly could have seen them. Just nothing coming to mind.


i agree with that.
i thought you were just stating tackles didnt matter, good to know i was wrong Laughing


This

It's exactly how his argument sounded. Like tackles were unimportant. Getting an explanation is like pulling teeth with that guy. But he had a nice Dion-like back pedal though. That gets a 2nd round grade. Laughing
_________________

Raider X hooked me with the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NCOUGHMAN


Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12592
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Neither franchise free-agent safety Tyvon Branch nor exclusive-rights free-agent fullback Marcel Reece have signed their tender offers

_________________


green24 wrote:
NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DOCLEW 28


Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10587
Location: East Oakland
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Now that the draft is over and teh UDFA's are coming in, the team can focus on their long term deals now.
_________________

Raider X hooked me with the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Silver&Black88


Joined: 24 Feb 2009
Posts: 24678
Location: Rochester, NY
PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

NCOUGHMAN wrote:
Quote:
Neither franchise free-agent safety Tyvon Branch nor exclusive-rights free-agent fullback Marcel Reece have signed their tender offers


This gives me a little agida. Maybe we're just trying to sign both long term.
_________________
husker_vikes3 wrote:
What do you season your meatballs and sausage with?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Oakland Raiders All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group