| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
3rivers
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 1689
|
 Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:40 am Post subject: DD or Glenn? |
 |
|
|
I know everyone is happy with the DD pick , myself included 
Was anyone hoping for Glenn instead since he could possibly handle some DT's better and is more versatile as a backup /emergency OT?
They got Adams which is like 2 specialists (Lt and RG) instead of a jack of all trades (essux, legursky) , master of none like they used to get. Finally a change in philosophy and the OL gets fixed, or has the potential to get fixed  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JustPlainNasty
Joined: 11 Feb 2008
Posts: 6363
Location: Las Vegas
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Youre gonna get 4-3 all fired up. I dont think there was anybody that wanted Glenn more than DeCastro.
I was probably one of the highest on Glenn and there was no question for me that I wanted DeCastro more. I would say that I thought maybe Steelers would like Glenn more because of tackle/guard versatility. Really though DeCastro can easily play center/guard and now we have a great backup for the center spot. In any case Essux or Legs may be gone, probably Essux but he did save us with his play at center.
_________________
| Dcash4 wrote: |
...you have a forum resume? |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
FourThreeMafia
Joined: 28 Sep 2006
Posts: 39945
Location: East of Sixburgh
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
DeCastro is, undoubtedly, the far superior prospect IMO.
Glenn may be huge, but he had alot of his own struggles.
Im not saying Glenn cant or wont be good, but IMO, Glenn went right around where he should have gone and DeCastro went about 10 picks after he should have.
_________________
| cluelessororke wrote: | | I am going to laugh in your face when they don't even sniff WR until day three of the draft |
Still waiting for your laugh.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stefan52268
Joined: 14 Apr 2010
Posts: 6488
Location: Pittsburgh
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
DeCastro was the no brainer here. He's an all around better prospect. The only thing Glenn has over him is body mass.
I think they both will have good careers but DeCastro should be better.
_________________
Props to Lyasr529 on the sweet sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ward4HOF
Joined: 11 Apr 2011
Posts: 2586
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 8:11 am Post subject: Re: DD or Glenn? |
|
|
|
| 3rivers wrote: | I know everyone is happy with the DD pick , myself included
Was anyone hoping for Glenn instead since he could possibly handle some DT's better and is more versatile as a backup /emergency OT?
They got Adams which is like 2 specialists (Lt and RG) instead of a jack of all trades (essux, legursky) , master of none like they used to get. Finally a change in philosophy and the OL gets fixed, or has the potential to get fixed |
Why do you feel he could handle them better than DD? Because he's bigger? I don't think there is a better prospect coming into this draft at "handling DTs" than DD. He not only is big, but he's strong as an ox, and has a great ability to get low, which translates, along w/ his strength, as the best in this class at "handling" DTs. His arms are shorter, so maybe you meant that, and that is a fair asumption, but really, DD was better than Glenn in all aspects of the game minus the versatility aspect, but even then, he could play OC in a pinch.
So to answer your question, absolutely not. If we would've selected Glenn over DD, I would have been one of those irrational fans who swore never to follow the Steelers again (then would've seen me here the next day  ). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
3rivers
Joined: 01 Jan 2011
Posts: 1689
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 10:07 am Post subject: Re: DD or Glenn? |
|
|
|
| Ward4HOF wrote: | | 3rivers wrote: | I know everyone is happy with the DD pick , myself included
Was anyone hoping for Glenn instead since he could possibly handle some DT's better and is more versatile as a backup /emergency OT?
They got Adams which is like 2 specialists (Lt and RG) instead of a jack of all trades (essux, legursky) , master of none like they used to get. Finally a change in philosophy and the OL gets fixed, or has the potential to get fixed |
Why do you feel he could handle them better than DD? Because he's bigger? I don't think there is a better prospect coming into this draft at "handling DTs" than DD. He not only is big, but he's strong as an ox, and has a great ability to get low, which translates, along w/ his strength, as the best in this class at "handling" DTs. His arms are shorter, so maybe you meant that, and that is a fair asumption, but really, DD was better than Glenn in all aspects of the game minus the versatility aspect, but even then, he could play OC in a pinch.
So to answer your question, absolutely not. If we would've selected Glenn over DD, I would have been one of those irrational fans who swore never to follow the Steelers again (then would've seen me here the next day ). |
Mayock said his only concern is with a bigger players across from him. Decastro should be pro bowler and it looks like Glenn will be out of position in Buffalo if at LT. Next year trade colon to the Bills for LG Glenn  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
