Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Day 3 Discussion
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 31, 32, 33
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ajdodge09


Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 4000
Location: Jobland looking for jobbies.
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perfect ending to an amazing draft.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Title Town USA


Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 15323
Location: Wisconsin
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Crazy, every pick plays a different position.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr Green


Joined: 15 Feb 2009
Posts: 1541
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It would've been nice to upgrade the running game. I really wanted Polk.

Now watch him have an Adrian Foster type impact on another team Sad
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Title Town USA


Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 15323
Location: Wisconsin
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr Green wrote:
It would've been nice to upgrade the running game. I really wanted Polk.

Now watch him have an Adrian Foster type impact on another team Sad


We'll sign an UDFA IMO...or sign Terrell Sutton (is he even available). Laughing
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GoPackGo25


Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 5887
Location: packerbacker87 on the avy!
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr Green wrote:
It would've been nice to upgrade the running game. I really wanted Polk.

Now watch him have an Adrian Foster type impact on another team Sad

Im high on Green. Hopefully Starks can actually stay healthy as well.
_________________

Credit: TheDeeeeej
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr Green


Joined: 15 Feb 2009
Posts: 1541
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GoPackGo25 wrote:
Mr Green wrote:
It would've been nice to upgrade the running game. I really wanted Polk.

Now watch him have an Adrian Foster type impact on another team Sad

Im high on Green. Hopefully Starks can actually stay healthy as well.


I like those two but very meh on Saine. Always important to have good depth at RB. Poor RB or injuries to our RB make our offence too one dimensional. Remember when Grant was injured for the season...we struggled all season until Starks hit form in the playoffs.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spilltray


Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 8648
Location: Green Bay, WI
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr Green wrote:
It would've been nice to upgrade the running game. I really wanted Polk.

Now watch him have an Adrian Foster type impact on another team Sad

I wouldn't give Arian Foster enough carries to have an Arian Foster-type impact anyway. Why waste carries on a RB when you have Rodgers?

Stark/Green/Saine/UDFA(or even Grant back cheap) is good enough for RB. This isn't ever going to be an amazing running offense, and that is fine.
_________________
Wilfred wrote:
Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Tohnren


Joined: 29 Mar 2010
Posts: 664
Location: South Carolina
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GoPackGo25 wrote:
Im high on Green.


I bet you are. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.flash


Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 2751
Location: <- Coast
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Saine is very cuttable imo. We could bring in a guy that would take his roster spot away. With the extra 10 spots on the roster, more UDFA's are going to fill out TC rosters. Great for competition.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CWood21


Moderator
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 30532
Location: 'Merica
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

.flash wrote:
Saine is very cuttable imo. We could bring in a guy that would take his roster spot away. With the extra 10 spots on the roster, more UDFA's are going to fill out TC rosters. Great for competition.


He looked pretty good, definitely has a spot in the NFL. Won't be a star, but he's a damn fine 3rd down back.
_________________

^sandwhich on the sig^
iPwn wrote:
If I was going to blow $2,600 on a night of fun, the last thing I would be thinking to do was play skee ball.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
IrishGreen


Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 30784
Location: Wisconsin
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tohnren wrote:
GoPackGo25 wrote:
Im high on Green.


I bet you are. Wink


lmao. cheesy as hell, but i laughed
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
.flash


Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 2751
Location: <- Coast
PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tohnren wrote:
GoPackGo25 wrote:
Im high on Green.


I bet you are. Wink
Cool
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 31, 32, 33
Page 33 of 33

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group