| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Integrity 
Joined: 09 Mar 2006 Posts: 3871 Location: Columbia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mr. X wrote: | | ...Michael Oher, OT, Mississippi - He's not horrible but he's not good. While he has started every game he has looked bad at times and is a false start machine. There are even rumblings going around that they're going to let him walk when his contract is up. |
Can you cite a source for this? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jpeter15
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 170
|
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Saw this on the Ravens blog and thought it was interesting
| Quote: | The Ravens have a history of finding gems in the draft, which is often a result of having different draft boards than most teams around the league. That wasn’t the case this year, as the Ravens saw nearly all of their top 150 players taken off the board, forcing them to get creative in the later rounds.
“We normally don’t have that, but that’s the type of draft that we had this year, where our board was very similar to the other 31 clubs,” Newsome said.
“Things don’t always happen the way you want them to,” DeCosta said. “Some drafts, every player that you want kind of comes to you, and then other drafts – this year comes to mind; 2010 was very similar to this year – sometimes you just get wiped out.” |
http://blogs.baltimoreravens.com/2012/04/30/5-things-to-remember-about-2012-draft/
So my impression is our late round picks were not as highly rated as they were in other years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. X
Joined: 03 Sep 2005 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 12:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Integrity wrote: | | Mr. X wrote: | | ...Michael Oher, OT, Mississippi - He's not horrible but he's not good. While he has started every game he has looked bad at times and is a false start machine. There are even rumblings going around that they're going to let him walk when his contract is up. |
Can you cite a source for this? |
It's mostly stuff being said on the radio from various sources around the league and in the Baltimore media. Nevertheless they're still rumblings. I'll try to find something on the internet saying it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sessy
Joined: 05 Dec 2011 Posts: 69
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 1:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
The fact that you say Upshaw can only get one or two sacks a year just ended the discussion.
I don't know what analysis you're watching, but it isn't any of the dozens that I've seen, nor is it backed up by any film I've seen. The man isn't gonna get 12 sacks every year, no, but that doesn't mean he can't rush the QB.
I'd say 5 on his down years, and 10 on his best. I have to question if you've even watched film on the guy at all.
I think you're confusing the analysis of "doesn't have the exceptional burst necessary to be an elite passrusher" to "the man can't rush the QB at all."
Jarret Johnson got 2-5 sacks a year. If you can provide me an insight as to why you think Upshaw can't get more than that, please, be my guest. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. X
Joined: 03 Sep 2005 Posts: 1820
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 2:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Sessy wrote: | The fact that you say Upshaw can only get one or two sacks a year just ended the discussion.
I don't know what analysis you're watching, but it isn't any of the dozens that I've seen, nor is it backed up by any film I've seen. The man isn't gonna get 12 sacks every year, no, but that doesn't mean he can't rush the QB.
I'd say 5 on his down years, and 10 on his best. I have to question if you've even watched film on the guy at all.
I think you're confusing the analysis of "doesn't have the exceptional burst necessary to be an elite passrusher" to "the man can't rush the QB at all."
Jarret Johnson got 2-5 sacks a year. If you can provide me an insight as to why you think Upshaw can't get more than that, please, be my guest. |
I'm book marking this thread and we'll revisit it at the end of the season to see who was right. I've seen plenty of film on the guy and I simply don't like what I've seen. You guys don't have to believe me but I have a pretty good track record of projecting how draft picks are going to turn out. Sure, I'm wrong on occasion but I'm right more often than not. We'll revisit this at the end of the year and I'll see how it turns out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diamondbull424 
 Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Posts: 10017 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 2:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Sessy wrote: | The fact that you say Upshaw can only get one or two sacks a year just ended the discussion.
I don't know what analysis you're watching, but it isn't any of the dozens that I've seen, nor is it backed up by any film I've seen. The man isn't gonna get 12 sacks every year, no, but that doesn't mean he can't rush the QB.
I'd say 5 on his down years, and 10 on his best. I have to question if you've even watched film on the guy at all.
I think you're confusing the analysis of "doesn't have the exceptional burst necessary to be an elite passrusher" to "the man can't rush the QB at all."
Jarret Johnson got 2-5 sacks a year. If you can provide me an insight as to why you think Upshaw can't get more than that, please, be my guest. |
Agreed. And even then I think those analysts are underrating Upshaw's pass rushing talents in some cases. I look at Upshaw and a guy with that kind of motor, hand usage, violent play, and instincts... and not in frame, but in playing spirit he reminds me of Jared Allen. Obviously Allen has size and length that you can't teach and that obviously gives him a serious leg up and it's what makes him elite, but just looking at how each plays such a violent game, I see Upshaw getting AT LEAST 6-8 sacks off of effort plays. I think we need to get his weight down to 265, that should increase his explosiveness. 279 lbs is 15 lbs too much. Cutting that down should make that 4.81s speed more like 4.76s and that 27" vertical more like a 32" verical leap. On tape, I don't see elite explosion, but I definitely didn't see a below average athlete like some of Upshaw's proday numbers have indicated.
I hope we see a lot more rotation with our pass rushers this year (including Suggs). I'm expecting something like:
Upshaw: 8 sacks
Kruger: 7 sacks
Kindle: 3.5 sacks
The more I think about it the happier I am with Upshaw, we had good pass rushing numbers as a team last year, but our pass rush wasn't consistent and it really fell off once Ngata got hurt and couldn't push the pocket as strongly... we should have a nice set of edge threats at our disposal to make sure that doesn't happen again... and with a healthy Ngata that should only increase our pass rushing ability and it's consistency.
Pass rush has been the best method in stopping the elite QBs of the NFL and now we seem to be in a good spot with the guys we've brought in. The Texans had good pass rushers in Reed/Barwin, Watt/Smith, yet they took Mercillus and Crick. The smart drafting teams have went in the direction of adding multiple pass rushers, perhaps even overloading the position to get to the quarterback... and the Ravens were no different.
The Suggs/JJ for 90% of the game lineup may have worked, but it hasn't produced the pass rushing numbers that we would've hoped for. That formula clearly needs to be improved upon and overloading the pass rushing spots gives us that opportunity. We can't hope Suggs is DPOY every year and Ngata never is banged up just to have a beyond competent pass rush. _________________
Blind arrogance sows the field of it's own destruction. - Commander Greil, Fire Emblem |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diamondbull424 
 Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Posts: 10017 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ceejay wrote: | Damn, this is my 3000th post! I just want to thank everyone who has been there for me. Raven5255, diamindbull, drd, DTMB, BaLrAvEnS, BaltimoreTerp (even though I think he may have the lowest opinion of me ever) , coordinator, dcarey, and many more.
Also to the Webmaster. The fact you haven't banned me yet is a testament of your patience!
Just kidding, not doing a entire formal thing, just joking around.. Its been good posting with you guys though. SNA Exclusive may be the reason I have a stroke early but he's like the little annoying brother of the board.
With this said, I'm starting a push and it being.... If there is another Mod made in this room. I WANT IT! I have been here as long as some of the hardcore vets. I will become more mature and more detailed with my posts. If I don't get it (which is highly probable) I want "coordinator" to get it.
I had a few beers tonight and I'm feeling very good! God bless all you mofo's! Proud to be a Ravens fan! |
Just saw this post after catching back up on the thread. Congrats on the milestone ceejay! _________________
Blind arrogance sows the field of it's own destruction. - Commander Greil, Fire Emblem |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STrid
Joined: 20 Nov 2009 Posts: 976 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
My overall problem with the Upshaw selection has not so much to do with the position we addressed or with Upshaw as such, but more to do with the type he is, if that makes any sense.
Perhaps it has more to do with Kruger than anything, because, while I love Kruger, he's a weird animal in terms of ability. The guy is a pretty good rusher, but not great or elite, similarly he's pretty good against the run but not elite either. He's the sort of jack-of-all-trades player that doesn't really master anything specific.
That puts the Upshaw selection in a different light given, that while he may prove to be a good rusher his forte is in the run game Imo. He's the sort of guy who you'd love to have on the more versatile downs where the run and pass are both options, because he's not a liability against either, but if I had to rely on him to create consistent pressure off the edge in obvious passing situations I wouldn't be so confident. In that situation you'd like to have that guy who is great at pinning his ears back and getting after the QB, but may be a liability in other scenarios, to compliment Upshaw but Kruger doesn't really fit that bill.
I guess that's my main concern in terms of the pick. I'm not really sure we're getting a player that compliments what we've already got. This may all turn out to be an unjust concern if Kindle proves he has the ability to provide something as a passrusher and won't be relied upon to set the edge or drop in coverage. _________________
^Et billede siger mere end tusind ord! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SnA ExclusiVe 
Joined: 01 Jun 2011 Posts: 10607 Location: Spokane, WA
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
So at first people made it seem like we got a pass rusher opposite of Suggs in Upshaw; but now it seems like we simply replaced JJ with...another "watered down"version of JJ with SLIGHTLY better pass rushing ability.
Is that correct? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
STrid
Joined: 20 Nov 2009 Posts: 976 Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | So at first people made it seem like we got a pass rusher opposite of Suggs in Upshaw; but now it seems like we simply replaced JJ with...another "watered down"version of JJ with SLIGHTLY better pass rushing ability.
Is that correct? |
I would rather say that we got a JJ with 6-8 sacks a season instead of 3-5.
While I'm not a fan of Upshaws rushing it's more from the standpoint that I wan't edge rushers who can get you 12-14 sacks a season not that I think he's bad at it as such. It has more to do with philosophy than anything else. Some teams are happy with having one guy doing most of the rushing while the other OLB compliments him, just like JJ did with Suggs. Other teams are ready to compromise a bit in order to get two guys who can get 12-14 sacks each. _________________
^Et billede siger mere end tusind ord! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sp6488 
Joined: 14 Mar 2005 Posts: 6230 Location: MD
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| STrid wrote: | | SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | So at first people made it seem like we got a pass rusher opposite of Suggs in Upshaw; but now it seems like we simply replaced JJ with...another "watered down"version of JJ with SLIGHTLY better pass rushing ability.
Is that correct? |
I would rather say that we got a JJ with 6-8 sacks a season instead of 3-5.
While I'm not a fan of Upshaws rushing it's more from the standpoint that I wan't edge rushers who can get you 12-14 sacks a season not that I think he's bad at it as such. It has more to do with philosophy than anything else. Some teams are happy with having one guy doing most of the rushing while the other OLB compliments him, just like JJ did with Suggs. Other teams are ready to compromise a bit in order to get two guys who can get 12-14 sacks each. |
I think we'll see him come off the field in obvious passing downs, particularly in his rookie year. If he can set the edge against the run well, I could see him getting 5-6 sacks, with Kindle and Kruger combining to rush the passer from the OLB spot opposite Suggs on passing downs.
While I don't think We'll have a guy opposite Suggs with 12-14 sacks, I could see Upshaw/kruger/kindle combining for something like that. Add in some pass rush from Ngata and McPhee and I think we have a pretty good pass rush this upcoming season. _________________
| Tzimisce wrote: | I'm sorry you're drowning in a sea of delusion.
I won't be sorry when the Ravens finish 8-8. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flaccomania 
Joined: 12 Aug 2008 Posts: 16543 Location: Parkville, MD
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | So at first people made it seem like we got a pass rusher opposite of Suggs in Upshaw; but now it seems like we simply replaced JJ with...another "watered down"version of JJ with SLIGHTLY better pass rushing ability.
Is that correct? |
Where is anyone saying that Upshaw is a watered down version?
People are saying he gives us a similar player in the run game and setting the edge and a better player in rushing the passer. _________________
Why not Michael Jordan? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
coordinator0
Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 5873
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | So at first people made it seem like we got a pass rusher opposite of Suggs in Upshaw; but now it seems like we simply replaced JJ with...another "watered down"version of JJ with SLIGHTLY better pass rushing ability.
Is that correct? |
Not even close. Upshaw is a much better pass-rusher than Johnson and there won't be any drop-off in setting the edge and/or defending the run. It seems like you're trying to hate the pick when you don't know anything about Upshaw as a player.
| STrid wrote: |
I would rather say that we got a JJ with 6-8 sacks a season instead of 3-5.
While I'm not a fan of Upshaws rushing it's more from the standpoint that I wan't edge rushers who can get you 12-14 sacks a season not that I think he's bad at it as such. It has more to do with philosophy than anything else. Some teams are happy with having one guy doing most of the rushing while the other OLB compliments him, just like JJ did with Suggs. Other teams are ready to compromise a bit in order to get two guys who can get 12-14 sacks each. |
I would rather the Ravens switch to a scheme with more of a true 3-4 look as well but it seems as if they want to keep it as it is. The typical 12-14 sack pass-rusher would fail in the SAM LB position that Upshaw will play for the Ravens. I'm thinking of guys like Irvin, Branch, Mercilus, Curry, and probably McClellin from this draft class. If they are dedicated to keeping the defensive alignment they've been using the past few seasons then Upshaw is the ideal fit across from the main pass-rusher. He's definitely an upgrade from Johnson in terms of getting to the QB and he's compliments Suggs better in my opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diamondbull424 
 Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Posts: 10017 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | So at first people made it seem like we got a pass rusher opposite of Suggs in Upshaw; but now it seems like we simply replaced JJ with...another "watered down"version of JJ with SLIGHTLY better pass rushing ability.
Is that correct? |
I don't know what people you're referring to, but in my above post, I predicted Upshaw to get 8 sacks... I honestly can't see him getting anything less than 6 sacks if he's healthy and is featured in our OLB rotation (which I have to believe he will be). It honestly wouldn't surprise me if Upshaw reached double digit sacks. He'll be rushing the passer as our ROLB and won't be receiving the double teams he saw in college. He had 9.5 sacks against SEC caliber OTs... NFL starting RTs aren't going to be much better than that and when you consider the double teams Upshaw amassed in college as a pass rusher, I have to believe that the difference between an NFL RT vs the SEC OL + RB/TE isn't much if at all. Upshaw also had 4 less games in college vs. the NFL.
The only reason I don't think he cracks double digit sacks is that he'll be in a rotation with Kruger/Kindle... and the extent of that rotation has yet to be determined.
I could see Upshaw/Kindle being relied upon as the main players in our 34 sets and Kruger being utilized as our LE when we go 43... I honestly have no idea how we approach the rotation so it's hard to make a prediction. But if Upshaw sees as many snaps as JJ, I think it wouldn't be out of the realm of possible to hit double digit sacks. He'll never be the 15-20 sack guy, he's not elite. But he can definitely become an elite player like Suggs where his best production is 10 sacks and sets the edge at an elite level. _________________
Blind arrogance sows the field of it's own destruction. - Commander Greil, Fire Emblem |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
diamondbull424 
 Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Posts: 10017 Location: Baltimore, MD
|
Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| STrid wrote: | | SnA ExclusiVe wrote: | So at first people made it seem like we got a pass rusher opposite of Suggs in Upshaw; but now it seems like we simply replaced JJ with...another "watered down"version of JJ with SLIGHTLY better pass rushing ability.
Is that correct? |
I would rather say that we got a JJ with 6-8 sacks a season instead of 3-5.
While I'm not a fan of Upshaws rushing it's more from the standpoint that I wan't edge rushers who can get you 12-14 sacks a season not that I think he's bad at it as such. It has more to do with philosophy than anything else. Some teams are happy with having one guy doing most of the rushing while the other OLB compliments him, just like JJ did with Suggs. Other teams are ready to compromise a bit in order to get two guys who can get 12-14 sacks each. |
Honestly, I just don't view it as realistic for many players to reach that 12-14 sack level. Suggs doesn't even consistently land in those numbers. Personally I find nothing wrong with 6-8 sacks a season if multiple guys are landing in that range. It's hard for one guy to have such continued dominance. If Upshaw can set the edge at an elite level and land in that 6-8 sacks region.. that's golden, especially if he's in a rotation where other guys are producing sacks. Maybe if we ran a true 34 defense than maybe our guys would have a chance at reaching those numbers. But under the current system I think 6-8 sacks is good production. _________________
Blind arrogance sows the field of it's own destruction. - Commander Greil, Fire Emblem |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|