Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

2013 Detroit Lions Draft Prospects
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Detroit Lions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
darkomilicic


Joined: 11 Mar 2006
Posts: 935
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RyanFuller003 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
You lost me at Denard Robinson

I would probably vomit if we drafted Robinson for any reason. I don't even like him as a college QB.


For the Lions, he doesn't fit. But you don't think a team that could use a McCluster type WR/RB would give him a look? He's not a QB, but he's one of the best athletes in college football.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sllim Pickens


Moderator
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 17238
Location: Middle of the Mitten
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

darkomilicic wrote:
RyanFuller003 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
You lost me at Denard Robinson

I would probably vomit if we drafted Robinson for any reason. I don't even like him as a college QB.


For the Lions, he doesn't fit. But you don't think a team that could use a McCluster type WR/RB would give him a look? He's not a QB, but he's one of the best athletes in college football.


Im not sure the Chiefs want or can utilize a real McCluster. Guys at the NFL level are faster, stronger, and have a better understanding of the game. I dont think Denard will be a useful RB at 5'8" 140 lbs, and he will struggle as a WR as well. He is fast, but i dont see him being very productive in the NFL.
_________________


Adopt-A-Lion - Riley Reiff, OT/TE/FB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
RyanFuller003


Moderator
Joined: 07 Jan 2007
Posts: 19879
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sllim Pickens wrote:
darkomilicic wrote:
RyanFuller003 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
You lost me at Denard Robinson

I would probably vomit if we drafted Robinson for any reason. I don't even like him as a college QB.


For the Lions, he doesn't fit. But you don't think a team that could use a McCluster type WR/RB would give him a look? He's not a QB, but he's one of the best athletes in college football.


Im not sure the Chiefs want or can utilize a real McCluster. Guys at the NFL level are faster, stronger, and have a better understanding of the game. I dont think Denard will be a useful RB at 5'8" 140 lbs, and he will struggle as a WR as well. He is fast, but i dont see him being very productive in the NFL.

Haha, he's listed at 6'1" 193, and while that's probably a bit generous, I don't think he's that small.

I don't think there's any chance he can be a productive passer--we're talking significantly worse than Tim Tebow here--and the only role I imagine he'll be suited for us kick returns. And considering his speed won't be as unusual in the NFL as it is in the Big Ten, I don't even know if he'll be particularly good at it.
_________________

MrDrew wrote:
I may have to find a taxidermist that will make me a koozie out of a squirrel in a kilt now.

Adopt-a-Lion: Don Muhlbach
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sllim Pickens


Moderator
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 17238
Location: Middle of the Mitten
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 2:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RyanFuller003 wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
darkomilicic wrote:
RyanFuller003 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
You lost me at Denard Robinson

I would probably vomit if we drafted Robinson for any reason. I don't even like him as a college QB.


For the Lions, he doesn't fit. But you don't think a team that could use a McCluster type WR/RB would give him a look? He's not a QB, but he's one of the best athletes in college football.


Im not sure the Chiefs want or can utilize a real McCluster. Guys at the NFL level are faster, stronger, and have a better understanding of the game. I dont think Denard will be a useful RB at 5'8" 140 lbs, and he will struggle as a WR as well. He is fast, but i dont see him being very productive in the NFL.

Haha, he's listed at 6'1" 193, and while that's probably a bit generous, I don't think he's that small.

I don't think there's any chance he can be a productive passer--we're talking significantly worse than Tim Tebow here--and the only role I imagine he'll be suited for us kick returns. And considering his speed won't be as unusual in the NFL as it is in the Big Ten, I don't even know if he'll be particularly good at it.


Yeah, a little exageration. I think he might be helpful on a fedw set plays or something but in general, what made him dangerous is that DB's have their back to him, and he is faster than D-lineman and LB's. As a RB/WR he wont have that luxury, so I am not sure he will be a threat.
_________________


Adopt-A-Lion - Riley Reiff, OT/TE/FB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
1King


Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 24067
Location: MI
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sllim Pickens wrote:
RyanFuller003 wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
darkomilicic wrote:
RyanFuller003 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
You lost me at Denard Robinson

I would probably vomit if we drafted Robinson for any reason. I don't even like him as a college QB.


For the Lions, he doesn't fit. But you don't think a team that could use a McCluster type WR/RB would give him a look? He's not a QB, but he's one of the best athletes in college football.


Im not sure the Chiefs want or can utilize a real McCluster. Guys at the NFL level are faster, stronger, and have a better understanding of the game. I dont think Denard will be a useful RB at 5'8" 140 lbs, and he will struggle as a WR as well. He is fast, but i dont see him being very productive in the NFL.

Haha, he's listed at 6'1" 193, and while that's probably a bit generous, I don't think he's that small.

I don't think there's any chance he can be a productive passer--we're talking significantly worse than Tim Tebow here--and the only role I imagine he'll be suited for us kick returns. And considering his speed won't be as unusual in the NFL as it is in the Big Ten, I don't even know if he'll be particularly good at it.


Yeah, a little exageration. I think he might be helpful on a fedw set plays or something but in general, what made him dangerous is that DB's have their back to him, and he is faster than D-lineman and LB's. As a RB/WR he wont have that luxury, so I am not sure he will be a threat.


Not sure if serious or trolling.

Denard will measure in at 5'11 or 6'0 190 pounds or better, more than sufficient height/weight for an NFL WR or even RB. He has taken plenty of hits in the Big Ten, so it's not like he is playing in some small conference with small, slow defenses. He is also always the fastest or one of the fastest players on the field, WR and DB included. An Antwaan Randle El comparison is probably the most accurate player comparison for Denard, a dynamic, elite play-making QB that translates to WR at the next level. He is also the ultimate team guy and a hard worker, not some me-first type guy with work ethic questions.
_________________


^^^^^BeastM0de23RB on the sig.

CWood21 wrote:
Alright, congratulations to 1King. He is the winner of the inaugural NBA Trade Tournament.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sllim Pickens


Moderator
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 17238
Location: Middle of the Mitten
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1King wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
RyanFuller003 wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
darkomilicic wrote:
RyanFuller003 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
You lost me at Denard Robinson

I would probably vomit if we drafted Robinson for any reason. I don't even like him as a college QB.


For the Lions, he doesn't fit. But you don't think a team that could use a McCluster type WR/RB would give him a look? He's not a QB, but he's one of the best athletes in college football.


Im not sure the Chiefs want or can utilize a real McCluster. Guys at the NFL level are faster, stronger, and have a better understanding of the game. I dont think Denard will be a useful RB at 5'8" 140 lbs, and he will struggle as a WR as well. He is fast, but i dont see him being very productive in the NFL.

Haha, he's listed at 6'1" 193, and while that's probably a bit generous, I don't think he's that small.

I don't think there's any chance he can be a productive passer--we're talking significantly worse than Tim Tebow here--and the only role I imagine he'll be suited for us kick returns. And considering his speed won't be as unusual in the NFL as it is in the Big Ten, I don't even know if he'll be particularly good at it.


Yeah, a little exageration. I think he might be helpful on a fedw set plays or something but in general, what made him dangerous is that DB's have their back to him, and he is faster than D-lineman and LB's. As a RB/WR he wont have that luxury, so I am not sure he will be a threat.


Not sure if serious or trolling.

Denard will measure in at 5'11 or 6'0 190 pounds or better, more than sufficient height/weight for an NFL WR or even RB. He has taken plenty of hits in the Big Ten, so it's not like he is playing in some small conference with small, slow defenses. He is also always the fastest or one of the fastest players on the field, WR and DB included. An Antwaan Randle El comparison is probably the most accurate player comparison for Denard, a dynamic, elite play-making QB that translates to WR at the next level. He is also the ultimate team guy and a hard worker, not some me-first type guy with work ethic questions.


I amserious, not trolling since this is a Lions thread, not a Michigan one. Sure there are some QB's that translated well but do we know if he can catch, can he run routes or is he just shifty when DB's are running away from him. Without any threat of pass I dont think he is much of a threat. Also he wears down quickly throughout the season. I want nothing to do with him unless it is a 6th or 7th round pick and even then I would be skeptical.
_________________


Adopt-A-Lion - Riley Reiff, OT/TE/FB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Louis Delmas26


Joined: 16 Jan 2011
Posts: 408
Location: Detroit
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 4:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sllim Pickens wrote:
1King wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
RyanFuller003 wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
darkomilicic wrote:
RyanFuller003 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
You lost me at Denard Robinson

I would probably vomit if we drafted Robinson for any reason. I don't even like him as a college QB.


For the Lions, he doesn't fit. But you don't think a team that could use a McCluster type WR/RB would give him a look? He's not a QB, but he's one of the best athletes in college football.


Im not sure the Chiefs want or can utilize a real McCluster. Guys at the NFL level are faster, stronger, and have a better understanding of the game. I dont think Denard will be a useful RB at 5'8" 140 lbs, and he will struggle as a WR as well. He is fast, but i dont see him being very productive in the NFL.

Haha, he's listed at 6'1" 193, and while that's probably a bit generous, I don't think he's that small.

I don't think there's any chance he can be a productive passer--we're talking significantly worse than Tim Tebow here--and the only role I imagine he'll be suited for us kick returns. And considering his speed won't be as unusual in the NFL as it is in the Big Ten, I don't even know if he'll be particularly good at it.


Yeah, a little exageration. I think he might be helpful on a fedw set plays or something but in general, what made him dangerous is that DB's have their back to him, and he is faster than D-lineman and LB's. As a RB/WR he wont have that luxury, so I am not sure he will be a threat.


Not sure if serious or trolling.

Denard will measure in at 5'11 or 6'0 190 pounds or better, more than sufficient height/weight for an NFL WR or even RB. He has taken plenty of hits in the Big Ten, so it's not like he is playing in some small conference with small, slow defenses. He is also always the fastest or one of the fastest players on the field, WR and DB included. An Antwaan Randle El comparison is probably the most accurate player comparison for Denard, a dynamic, elite play-making QB that translates to WR at the next level. He is also the ultimate team guy and a hard worker, not some me-first type guy with work ethic questions.


I amserious, not trolling since this is a Lions thread, not a Michigan one. Sure there are some QB's that translated well but do we know if he can catch, can he run routes or is he just shifty when DB's are running away from him. Without any threat of pass I dont think he is much of a threat. Also he wears down quickly throughout the season. I want nothing to do with him unless it is a 6th or 7th round pick and even then I would be skeptical.


You can quote me on this: Denard Robinson will not make it out of the 2nd round.

He will be drafted as a playmaking WR full of potential. Kiper already has him as a top 3 WR in the next draft class and if any team needs a speed demon WR hes their man. Denard will run at least a 4.3 40 and he ran track for Michigan his freshman year and won the Big Ten's 80 Meter if I am correct (I dont know much about track), so trust me Denard will get drafted early. I dont know if I would take him that early but someone will. Hes a great kid and even a better athlete. I think Desean Jackson as a fair comparison for him, but thats if he pans out, if not he is like a Devin Hester type.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sllim Pickens


Moderator
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 17238
Location: Middle of the Mitten
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 4:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree he will be drafted before that, i just wouldnt do it. A lot of guys ran track and a lot of guys are fast, that dosnt mean they are good WR's. Denard has shown he is shifty when being rushed by DE's and DT'
s, and that he can break away in the open field, but he hasnt shown me he can catch or create the space needed on his own.
_________________


Adopt-A-Lion - Riley Reiff, OT/TE/FB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
diehardlionfan


Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 21504
Location: Ottawa
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Louis Delmas26 wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
1King wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
RyanFuller003 wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
darkomilicic wrote:
RyanFuller003 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
You lost me at Denard Robinson

I would probably vomit if we drafted Robinson for any reason. I don't even like him as a college QB.


For the Lions, he doesn't fit. But you don't think a team that could use a McCluster type WR/RB would give him a look? He's not a QB, but he's one of the best athletes in college football.


Im not sure the Chiefs want or can utilize a real McCluster. Guys at the NFL level are faster, stronger, and have a better understanding of the game. I dont think Denard will be a useful RB at 5'8" 140 lbs, and he will struggle as a WR as well. He is fast, but i dont see him being very productive in the NFL.

Haha, he's listed at 6'1" 193, and while that's probably a bit generous, I don't think he's that small.

I don't think there's any chance he can be a productive passer--we're talking significantly worse than Tim Tebow here--and the only role I imagine he'll be suited for us kick returns. And considering his speed won't be as unusual in the NFL as it is in the Big Ten, I don't even know if he'll be particularly good at it.


Yeah, a little exageration. I think he might be helpful on a fedw set plays or something but in general, what made him dangerous is that DB's have their back to him, and he is faster than D-lineman and LB's. As a RB/WR he wont have that luxury, so I am not sure he will be a threat.


Not sure if serious or trolling.

Denard will measure in at 5'11 or 6'0 190 pounds or better, more than
sufficient height/weight for an NFL WR or even RB. He has taken plenty of hits in the Big Ten, so it's not like he is playing in some small conference with small, slow defenses. He is also always the fastest or one of the fastest players on the field, WR and DB included. An Antwaan Randle El comparison is probably the most accurate player comparison for Denard, a dynamic, elite play-making QB that translates to WR at the next level. He is also the ultimate team guy and a hard worker, not some me-first type guy with work ethic questions.


I amserious, not trolling since this is a Lions thread, not a Michigan one. Sure there are some QB's that translated well but do we know if he can catch, can
he run routes or is he just shifty when DB's are running away from him. Without any threat of pass I dont think he is much of a threat. Also he wears down quickly throughout the season. I want nothing to do with him unless it is a 6th or 7th round pick and even then I would be skeptical.


You can quote me on this: Denard Robinson will not make it out of the 2nd round.

He will be drafted as a playmaking WR full of potential. Kiper already has him as a top 3 WR in the next draft class and if any team needs a speed demon WR hes their man. Denard will run at least a 4.3 40 and he ran track for Michigan his freshman year and won the Big Ten's 80 Meter if I am correct (I dont know much about track), so trust me Denard will get drafted early. I dont know if I would take him that early but someone will. Hes a great kid and
even a better athlete. I think Desean Jackson as a fair comparison for him, but thats if he pans out, if not he is like a Devin Hester type.


I don't understand how you can compare him to Jackson. Jackson has been a receiver through high school and college while Robinson has never played the position.

As for speed the best 40 time I have ever read for him was 4.32. I would expect his time will be slower not faster.
_________________


Sig by LionsFTW

To know what is right and not do it is the worst cowardice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DTOW


Joined: 05 Feb 2009
Posts: 857
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Amerson had another pick in their spring game.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uEbq48_ylw

He is fun to watch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Detroitlions703


Joined: 22 Dec 2008
Posts: 9533
Location: Michigan
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DTOW wrote:
Amerson had another pick in their spring game.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uEbq48_ylw

He is fun to watch.


Yea hes gonna be a good one for sure. IMO the 1st CB off the board next year. That was a sick college catch too, though i am sure that would be an incomplete pass in the pros
_________________
Ziggy Ansah on quarterbacks
Quote:
“You’ve got to love them. If you love somebody, you want to grab them. So, I love quarterbacks.”
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Honalulufan20


Joined: 25 Jan 2009
Posts: 2639
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 3:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Xavier Rhodes CB FSU
_________________


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LionsFan630


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 11149
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Couple positions to keep an eye on, honestly it'll probably be the same as this year:

OFFENSE

OT- Even with Rieff, Backus is nearly done and Goz's deal is up next season. Fox has yet to step up and Hilliard looks like a solid backup at best.

Options: Fluker (ALA), Henderson (MIA), Matthews (TA&M)

OG- Peterman isn't getting any younger and should be replaced sooner rather than later.

Options: Jones (ALA), Bailey (ARK), Warford (UK)

OC- Dom is nearing the end, no solid replacement lined up yet.

Options: Habern (OU), Benavides (LOU), Johnson (SC)

RB- Question marks still surround Best and LeShoure until they can prove otherwise.

Options: Lattimore (SC), Dyer (UAB), Ball (WISC)

DEFENSE

DE- Avril and Jackson are scheduled to be FA, KVB is nearing the end.

Options: Paige-Moss (UNC), Jenkins (FSU), Taylor (SC), Massaquoi (TROY)

LB- Levy and Durant are free.

Options: Johnson (ALA), Jenkins (UF), Thomas (STAN), Powell (UF)

CB- Houston is a FA, no real building blocks at the position currently.

Options: Rhodes (FSU), Evans (NEB), Trufant (WASH)

S- Delmas is a FA, Spievey is ok at best.

Options: Lester (ALA), McDonald (USC), Jefferson (OU)
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheROARisBACK


Joined: 22 Jan 2011
Posts: 3137
Location: Joe on the sig
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LionsFan630 wrote:

Options: Fluker (ALA), Henderson (MIA), Matthews (TA&M)


Feels like he was just a highly touted recruit just yesterday. Any one know how he has been at Miami? Haven't been able to keep up with him.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Detroit Lions All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group