| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BrettFavre4
Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 301
Location: Buffalo
|
 Posted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:13 pm Post subject: Raiders sign former Cardinals, Texans QB Matt Leinart |
 |
|
|
As expected:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d828cb518/article/matt-leinart-signs-with-oakland-raiders-after-workout?module=HP11_headline_stack
| Quote: | | Former Arizona Cardinals and Houston Texans quarterback Matt Leinart signed a one-year deal with the Oakland Raiders on Tuesday after working out with the team, a source with knowledge of the situation confirmed. |
Really a shame to see Leinart never find success in the NFL after being so hyped up before being drafted. I still own his rookie card and thought it might be worth some money some day; now he's on his third NFL team barely retaining a backup job. That's the way things go I guess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SwiftTexan
Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Posts: 2421
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yeah - I posted that he was visiting during the draft weekend. I really like Leinart and still thought he had some hope in the right system. I'm not sure what the Raiders plan to do with McKenzie and Allen but they've always been a deep threat offense and that's not Leinart's strong suit. Some Raiders fans can probably shed more light on this than I can. I think it's pretty cool that Leinart is backing up Palmer...again. Maybe Cassel can be their 3rd stringer?
_________________
GO SEAHAWKS GO!
Not a Texans fan...just a nickname.
April 7th, 2013
| aceinthehouse wrote: | Don't sweat Seattle.
They're overrated & not making the Playoffs next season.
8-8 or 9-7 best for Seattle. (& No Playoffs) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Withmy89vision
Joined: 07 Aug 2007
Posts: 2719
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
So why did they take Terrell Pryor in the supplemental draft again?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RaisinBran
Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 8876
Location: 925 Bay Area
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 1:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Withmy89vision wrote: | | So why did they take Terrell Pryor in the supplemental draft again? |
Because he ran a 4.3? DUH  
You know how we do... or did
_________________
(MLB)=A's, (NFL)=Raiders, (NBA)= Warriors
360 GT: KDubballin24 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Totty
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 9309
Location: Oswego NY
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Withmy89vision wrote: | | So why did they take Terrell Pryor in the supplemental draft again? |
I wish some of you would pay attention. A different regieme took Pryor. Now, it looks like we signed a quality backup in case Palmer goes down.
This isn't rocket science guy. You cannot have too many QBs, much less young ones when Palmer is early/mid 30s
_________________
First Steve Jobs, Now Al Davis.. God must be building something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SwiftTexan
Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Posts: 2421
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Totty wrote: | | Withmy89vision wrote: | | So why did they take Terrell Pryor in the supplemental draft again? |
I wish some of you would pay attention. A different regieme took Pryor. Now, it looks like we signed a quality backup in case Palmer goes down.
This isn't rocket science guy. You cannot have too many QBs, much less young ones when Palmer is early/mid 30s |
Agreed - Campbell left in FA so you sign Leinart as a veteran back-up.
Won't Pryor stick around though as a 3rd QB and developmental project though?
_________________
GO SEAHAWKS GO!
Not a Texans fan...just a nickname.
April 7th, 2013
| aceinthehouse wrote: | Don't sweat Seattle.
They're overrated & not making the Playoffs next season.
8-8 or 9-7 best for Seattle. (& No Playoffs) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dante9876
Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 17528
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 2:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Withmy89vision wrote: | | So why did they take Terrell Pryor in the supplemental draft again? |
So have a second year QB who hasnt had an offseason or thrown a pass in an NFL game as our primary backup QB to Palmer. Yeah that would be a fantastic idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Totty
Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 9309
Location: Oswego NY
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 3:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SwiftTexan wrote: | | Totty wrote: | | Withmy89vision wrote: | | So why did they take Terrell Pryor in the supplemental draft again? |
I wish some of you would pay attention. A different regieme took Pryor. Now, it looks like we signed a quality backup in case Palmer goes down.
This isn't rocket science guy. You cannot have too many QBs, much less young ones when Palmer is early/mid 30s |
Agreed - Campbell left in FA so you sign Leinart as a veteran back-up.
Won't Pryor stick around though as a 3rd QB and developmental project though? |
Yea, Pryor will be the #3 guy... if he makes the team.
Reggie Mac might let him go if he doesn't look like anything in preseason and mini camps.
_________________
First Steve Jobs, Now Al Davis.. God must be building something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
texans_uk
Joined: 26 Feb 2009
Posts: 25079
Location: Kempes on the sig
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Was going to post this story, but figured it wasn't important enough.
_________________
| DallasInHeart wrote: | | Buddy if you lived in Europe or ever gone to visit Europe you would know that over there Football is totally on a different level |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TomRalph
Joined: 03 Apr 2009
Posts: 5816
Location: Leeds, England
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Terrelle Pryor was such a lulzy pick.
3rd in the Supplemental is basically 1st Round value in the normal draft, but now it seems Pryor won't even see the field, at least for the next couple of years.
_________________
| Jmacz008 (With the 32nd Pick of the 2014 NFL Draft) wrote: | | ...the New England Rutgers select, Rutgers Rutgers, Rutgers from Rutgers |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EliteTexan80
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 37192
Location: Three time Mr. fanTASTic!
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Makes sense, Leinart and OC Greg Knapp have a good working relationship. Called this before the draft, actually...
Next up, Jacoby Jones. 
_________________
iPwn, Kempes and Flaccomania: The official sig makers for THE ET80! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tom cody
Joined: 01 Sep 2007
Posts: 6571
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Always like Leinart, hopefully he gets it together in Oakland.
_________________
Why, if it isn't my old friend, Mr. McGreg. With a leg for an arm and an arm for a leg. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
91jmay
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 20647
Location: Wonderland
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TomRalph wrote: | Terrelle Pryor was such a lulzy pick.
3rd in the Supplemental is basically 1st Round value in the normal draft, but now it seems Pryor won't even see the field, at least for the next couple of years. |
I don't get it.
A draft pick which is directly equal to a 3rd round value, is basically a first round value.
_________________
| baconrad3 wrote: | | You mean Matt Stafford aka Stat Padford? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dante9876
Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 17528
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 10:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TomRalph wrote: | Terrelle Pryor was such a lulzy pick.
3rd in the Supplemental is basically 1st Round value in the normal draft, but now it seems Pryor won't even see the field, at least for the next couple of years. |
LOLWhat? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
plan9misfit
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 18011
Location: RIP: B2TB, T14, & S.A. We miss you.
|
| Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 10:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TomRalph wrote: | Terrelle Pryor was such a lulzy pick.
3rd in the Supplemental is basically 1st Round value in the normal draft, but now it seems Pryor won't even see the field, at least for the next couple of years. |
Pryor was never anything more than a 5th-6th round pick in a conventional draft, but the Raiders still obsess over how fast a guy can run rather than pay attention to how well he actually plays his respective position. Pryor had glaring deficiencies as a QB at Ohio State, but teams keep falling into that ideological trap that a QB who runs well means that he's a good player. And Pryor is not a good player.
_________________
Co-Founder: DCRA - No McQuistan, No Super Bowl
| The_Slamman wrote: | | It's like we are in a win now mentality with lose now personnel. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
