| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Misfitz
Joined: 07 Oct 2006
Posts: 123
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 12, 2006 12:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| why do alot of people think we need a first round reciever when we are in the top half of the league in offense and the bottem half in defense we suck on defense the pick here Landry is the pick here and somehow getting Carriker in the second and then getting David Irons in the third would be great |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nb5005
Joined: 01 Feb 2006
Posts: 1030
Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| We wouldn't crucify MM until Calvin turns out to be a bust. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RockRaider
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 57
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I cant see the Raiders taking Quinn. They passed on Leinart/Cutler who were better prospects last year, to stick with Andrew Walter. And he has shown that with decent protection he can make all the throws necessary to be successful. With the #1 overall, they would go Peterson or Johnson.
_________________
Thanks epackfan for the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Niners4Ever
Joined: 15 Mar 2006
Posts: 5146
Location: Cloud 9
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
First of all, we dont select Ginn,
2nd of all.....Leon Hall is a mid-1st round pick....not a 2nd rounder...SORRY!
_________________
Rest in Peace B2TB and CrakBurn... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
