Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

notes from minicamp (tim twentyman)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Detroit Lions
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
detfan782004


Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39120
Location: Montana
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 6:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mijags wrote:
its a toss up to say anyone left in FA right now is any better than what we have on the roster right now........rather have a UDFA with upside that we can cultivate than someone who will cost more and probably be near the end of their carreer anyways......


Maybe if this were Madden. I think a ton of people on here really devalue how much better veterans are able to pick up an offense.

That alone gives any vet the edge.
_________________


FFMD II AGM- DETROIT LIONS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SadLionFan00


Joined: 22 Jan 2008
Posts: 14342
Location: Michigan State University
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 6:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

detfan782004 wrote:
mijags wrote:
its a toss up to say anyone left in FA right now is any better than what we have on the roster right now........rather have a UDFA with upside that we can cultivate than someone who will cost more and probably be near the end of their carreer anyways......


Maybe if this were Madden. I think a ton of people on here really devalue how much better veterans are able to pick up an offense.

That alone gives any vet the edge.


If this guy is impressing as much as he is, I dont see the point in bringing in a random FA WR who wouldnt play anyways over the young guy that is displaying impressive skills.
_________________
Silver&Black88 wrote:
Quote:
Trestman is a great coach but Cutler is already a pouty overconfident poo flinger. What more can he do with him?
Get him to fling poo more accurately and make better decisions when flinging it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
IDOG_det


Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 11703
Location: here
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SadLionFan00 wrote:
detfan782004 wrote:
mijags wrote:
its a toss up to say anyone left in FA right now is any better than what we have on the roster right now........rather have a UDFA with upside that we can cultivate than someone who will cost more and probably be near the end of their carreer anyways......


Maybe if this were Madden. I think a ton of people on here really devalue how much better veterans are able to pick up an offense.

That alone gives any vet the edge.


If this guy is impressing as much as he is, I dont see the point in bringing in a random FA WR who wouldnt play anyways over the young guy that is displaying impressive skills.
Exactly, Stovall was pretty much the #6 WR and barely saw the field. Logan was like #4 and also had a hard time getting PT. Same for Davis. We don't need a vet to pick up the offense, especially if he's barely playing. With the addition of Broyles, the #5 & 6 WR's will play even less. And, if Edwards has a whole offseason to learn the playbook, he should know it as well as any vet (unless we sign that vet today and he begins studying the playbook right away). Edwards also has more potential than any vet who is only good enough for a #5 or #6 spot and is closer to 30 than Edwards is.
_________________
Kate Upton for sexy President!!!
Travi$ Scott is better than you

^^^^Kempes on the sig^^^^

"The original Ezekiel Ansah fan"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mijags


Joined: 22 Dec 2007
Posts: 2974
Location: kalamazoo, mi
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

after making the team as a walk-on in houston, then breaking his leg in 2008 and putting his career in doubt, then having a 20 td season his senior year and then not getting drafted despite that kind of production, i think the kid has a fire in his belly to succeed. i wish all the best to him and hope he makes the final 53.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LionsFan630


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 11149
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

People do realize that Davis and Stovall aren't under contract, right?

Only WR's under contract right now are:

84 Broyles, Ryan
13 Burleson, Nate
18 Burrell, Troy
83 Edwards, Patrick
10 Harris, Marcus
86 Hughes, Nate
81 Johnson, Calvin
12 Karstetter, Jared
11 Logan, Stefan
80 Long, Lance
19 Toliver, Terrence
16 Young, Titus

Also supposedly signed WR Wallace Miles UDFA out of North Carolina A&T today.

http://blogs.detroitlions.com/2012/05/14/source-lions-reach-roster-limit-with-signing-of-wr-wallace-miles/

So assuming we keep 5... Broyles, Burleson, Johnson, Young obviously. Final spot IMO comes down to Edwards and Logan. Could wind up keeping both if Broyles is placed on PUP.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LionsFTW


Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 17035
Location: Rock City, Arkansas
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 7:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

detfan782004 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
detfan782004 wrote:
Quote:
No he used Steve Smith based on SIZE. Edwards is nowhere near Steve Smith speed. So to say he did speed and size is laughable.

So in return I think every 6'3" to 6'4" WR can be as good as Calvin regardless of anything else based on his theoryNot exactly. Steve Smith coming out was the same height, but 10-ish pounds heavier. Edwards ran a slower 40, but had faster times in the 3-cone and 20-yard shuffle. Smith did it 100% healthy, Edwards did it while injured. Bill "Dwight" Bentley, our 3rd round pick, ran a 4.43 and got burned by Edwards on a play. Bentley's speed was spoken very highly of by our Front Office. So saying he's a slow WR, is wrong, and there is evidence to back that. Also, saying that Sllim has a "theory" that WR succes is based off of size is complete ignorance.

Now, do I expect Edwards to make the team? No. Do I hope he does? Yes, because I think he has more to offer than Logan does, and Stovall and maybe even more than Rashied Davis. I think he'd make a decent #5 this year. Last year we rolled with 6 WR's. I want Logan, and Stovall gone for sure. Davis can stay because he was decent on ST's and seems like a good vocal leader. Adding Broyles & Edwards replaces Logan & Stovall.


Was Bentley not back peddling and covering?

Last time I checked the DB doesnt line right next to WR and run with.

Using that example to show Edwards is fast is hilarious.


A LOT of people can get initial burst past a CB facing them.

He may be QUICK but HE IS NOT FAST


Based on what? A 40 time that he ran injured?


Based on watching him play


So youve watched UofH games and paid attention to Pat Edwards? I find that hard to believe because nobody watches UofH.
_________________
YlionsY wrote:
I hope you get banned so hard you can't walk right for a week.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
detfan782004


Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39120
Location: Montana
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 9:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LionsFTW wrote:
detfan782004 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
detfan782004 wrote:
Quote:
No he used Steve Smith based on SIZE. Edwards is nowhere near Steve Smith speed. So to say he did speed and size is laughable.

So in return I think every 6'3" to 6'4" WR can be as good as Calvin regardless of anything else based on his theoryNot exactly. Steve Smith coming out was the same height, but 10-ish pounds heavier. Edwards ran a slower 40, but had faster times in the 3-cone and 20-yard shuffle. Smith did it 100% healthy, Edwards did it while injured. Bill "Dwight" Bentley, our 3rd round pick, ran a 4.43 and got burned by Edwards on a play. Bentley's speed was spoken very highly of by our Front Office. So saying he's a slow WR, is wrong, and there is evidence to back that. Also, saying that Sllim has a "theory" that WR succes is based off of size is complete ignorance.

Now, do I expect Edwards to make the team? No. Do I hope he does? Yes, because I think he has more to offer than Logan does, and Stovall and maybe even more than Rashied Davis. I think he'd make a decent #5 this year. Last year we rolled with 6 WR's. I want Logan, and Stovall gone for sure. Davis can stay because he was decent on ST's and seems like a good vocal leader. Adding Broyles & Edwards replaces Logan & Stovall.


Was Bentley not back peddling and covering?

Last time I checked the DB doesnt line right next to WR and run with.

Using that example to show Edwards is fast is hilarious.


A LOT of people can get initial burst past a CB facing them.

He may be QUICK but HE IS NOT FAST


Based on what? A 40 time that he ran injured?


Based on watching him play


So youve watched UofH games and paid attention to Pat Edwards? I find that hard to believe because nobody watches UofH.


Yes almost every single game unfortunately. Buddy is from Lubbock and one would think he is a TT fan which he is but his other half is a UofH fan.

So I have seen him a ton. He is quick but he is NOT FAST
_________________


FFMD II AGM- DETROIT LIONS
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WillieYoungSon


Joined: 15 Feb 2012
Posts: 123
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 7:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nnivolcm wrote:
Every year we have that one guy fighting for a roster spot who reportedly lights up training camp and makes impact plays in preseason games and it seems all the fans want him, but he ends up being cut anyways. Will Edwards be that guy this year?


Of all the udfa's not named kellen moore, Houston was my favorite to make the squad.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sllim Pickens


Moderator
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 17238
Location: Middle of the Mitten
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 11:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

detfan782004 wrote:
IDOG_det wrote:
detfan782004 wrote:
IDOG_det wrote:
detfan782004 wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
detfan782004 wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
detfan782004 wrote:
Sllim Pickens wrote:
detfan782004 wrote:
stylish313 wrote:
diehardlionfan wrote:
Good to read Travis Lewis showing some stuff.

People forget Lewis was the top ranked Sooner prior to this last season. If he regains his form he will be the steal of the draft.
Yeah, some people even berated us for suggesting he could be in the LB rotation this season, and even suggested that he probably wouldn't make our roster since he was a 7th round selection.

I'm paying attention to his progress; yes, I was one of those that were high on Travis before he pulled out of the 2011 draft.


He has a FAR better shot at roster than Edwards


Why, because he was a big name and went to a bigger school? He was 15 picks from being an UDFA himself, its not like he is a 1st round talent that fell to the 7th. I like Lewis, but am still not ready to hand him a roster spot because in some mocks he was a 1st round pick last year. So was Michael Brewster and he went undrafted and likely wont stick around the league long. I think Edwards has a better shot purely on the fact that we only have 4 WR's, 5 if you count Tolliver but he likely has less of a shot than Edwards for making the roster.


No because they wont carry two rookie WR this year given who they have at the position.

Given fact Edwards is a midget at WR

Lot of factors


But they are guaranteed to keep two rooklies at LB? Especially when LB's usually are harder to interchange than WR's? And why would they not keep two rookie WR's when it is their 4th and 5th? Especially when one was drafted in the 2nd round. Edwards is the type of rookie WR you keep. Cheap, low expectations, and some potential. You dont want to spend much more than UDFA contracts for a 5th WR.

5'9" is short yes, but so is Steve Smith and so many other WR's in the league. Hell Titus and Broyles are barely taller.


I knew you would come at me with Steve Smith. Steve Smith speed is elite.

Give me a break. Its tougher to learn offense then defense as well.

Defensive guys come in this league and make name for themselves waaaayyy easier because its easier to dumb down defense


Steve Smith's speed is not still elite, its good but not elite. Edwards ran slow in timed drills, but everyone has said he is faster on the field than the poor time he ran. He was projected a mid round pick before the 40 time as well. Also, i didnt come with just Steve Smith, there are a lot of 5'9"-5"10 WR's in the game now, it isnt rare. Hell Stefon logan is shorter, and less effective as a WR likely.


Gotcha so EVERY 6'3- 6'4 WR is gonna be good in this league because Calvin Johnson is.

Thanks for clarifying
Where did he say that?


He said because Steve Smith is good at 5 9 that Edwards can be too.

I am using his theory.
To me it looked like he was saying that because others his size and his speed and overall similar physical traits have done it before make it possible for him to do it as well. Not that size dictates how good you'll be like you said here :

detfan782004 wrote:
Gotcha so EVERY 6'3- 6'4 WR is gonna be good in this league because Calvin Johnson is.

Thanks for clarifying



No he used Steve Smith based on SIZE. Edwards is nowhere near Steve Smith speed. So to say he did speed and size is laughable.

So in return I think every 6'3" to 6'4" WR can be as good as Calvin regardless of anything else based on his theory


I used Stev Smith and many others that were his size. Not all have elite speed, and it has been said that Edwards game speed is pretty elite compared to his combine speed. And I never said that Edwards would be an elite WR, so keep putting words in my mouth. I am just stating that WR's his size play in the NFL, since you called him a midget (2 of our WR are his size allread). He is a 5th WR if he makes the team. I am not saying he will, I just really don't buy your reasoning (they wont carry two rookie WR's even though a lot of teams have in the past and he is a midget).
_________________


Adopt-A-Lion - Riley Reiff, OT/TE/FB
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
LionsFTW


Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 17035
Location: Rock City, Arkansas
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

detfan782004 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
detfan782004 wrote:
LionsFTW wrote:
detfan782004 wrote:
Quote:
No he used Steve Smith based on SIZE. Edwards is nowhere near Steve Smith speed. So to say he did speed and size is laughable.

So in return I think every 6'3" to 6'4" WR can be as good as Calvin regardless of anything else based on his theoryNot exactly. Steve Smith coming out was the same height, but 10-ish pounds heavier. Edwards ran a slower 40, but had faster times in the 3-cone and 20-yard shuffle. Smith did it 100% healthy, Edwards did it while injured. Bill "Dwight" Bentley, our 3rd round pick, ran a 4.43 and got burned by Edwards on a play. Bentley's speed was spoken very highly of by our Front Office. So saying he's a slow WR, is wrong, and there is evidence to back that. Also, saying that Sllim has a "theory" that WR succes is based off of size is complete ignorance.

Now, do I expect Edwards to make the team? No. Do I hope he does? Yes, because I think he has more to offer than Logan does, and Stovall and maybe even more than Rashied Davis. I think he'd make a decent #5 this year. Last year we rolled with 6 WR's. I want Logan, and Stovall gone for sure. Davis can stay because he was decent on ST's and seems like a good vocal leader. Adding Broyles & Edwards replaces Logan & Stovall.


Was Bentley not back peddling and covering?

Last time I checked the DB doesnt line right next to WR and run with.

Using that example to show Edwards is fast is hilarious.


A LOT of people can get initial burst past a CB facing them.

He may be QUICK but HE IS NOT FAST


Based on what? A 40 time that he ran injured?


Based on watching him play


So youve watched UofH games and paid attention to Pat Edwards? I find that hard to believe because nobody watches UofH.


Yes almost every single game unfortunately. Buddy is from Lubbock and one would think he is a TT fan which he is but his other half is a UofH fan.

So I have seen him a ton. He is quick but he is NOT FAST


Im not disagreeing with you. I just have never watched a Houston game and wanted to make sure people assessing him have.
_________________
YlionsY wrote:
I hope you get banned so hard you can't walk right for a week.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LionsFTW


Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 17035
Location: Rock City, Arkansas
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 11:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also, if he is quicker than fast, thats ok because hes a slot guy.
_________________
YlionsY wrote:
I hope you get banned so hard you can't walk right for a week.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
qball8001


Joined: 22 Nov 2005
Posts: 7932
Location: Arizona
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LionsFan630 wrote:
People do realize that Davis and Stovall aren't under contract, right?

Only WR's under contract right now are:

84 Broyles, Ryan
13 Burleson, Nate
18 Burrell, Troy
83 Edwards, Patrick
10 Harris, Marcus
86 Hughes, Nate
81 Johnson, Calvin
12 Karstetter, Jared
11 Logan, Stefan
80 Long, Lance
19 Toliver, Terrence
16 Young, Titus

Also supposedly signed WR Wallace Miles UDFA out of North Carolina A&T today.

http://blogs.detroitlions.com/2012/05/14/source-lions-reach-roster-limit-with-signing-of-wr-wallace-miles/

So assuming we keep 5... Broyles, Burleson, Johnson, Young obviously. Final spot IMO comes down to Edwards and Logan. Could wind up keeping both if Broyles is placed on PUP.


CJ, Burleson, Titus, Broyles, Edwards to open day one. Practice Squad and eventual the new number 5 would be Miles...

Hell, what do I know though.
_________________
Lions are completely inept.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
DrRay11


Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 2117
Location: Chicago, IL
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

qball8001 wrote:
LionsFan630 wrote:
People do realize that Davis and Stovall aren't under contract, right?

Only WR's under contract right now are:

84 Broyles, Ryan
13 Burleson, Nate
18 Burrell, Troy
83 Edwards, Patrick
10 Harris, Marcus
86 Hughes, Nate
81 Johnson, Calvin
12 Karstetter, Jared
11 Logan, Stefan
80 Long, Lance
19 Toliver, Terrence
16 Young, Titus

Also supposedly signed WR Wallace Miles UDFA out of North Carolina A&T today.

http://blogs.detroitlions.com/2012/05/14/source-lions-reach-roster-limit-with-signing-of-wr-wallace-miles/

So assuming we keep 5... Broyles, Burleson, Johnson, Young obviously. Final spot IMO comes down to Edwards and Logan. Could wind up keeping both if Broyles is placed on PUP.


CJ, Burleson, Titus, Broyles, Edwards to open day one. Practice Squad and eventual the new number 5 would be Miles...

Hell, what do I know though.


I think that's the right 5. Edwards over Logan.
_________________
Football is love, love is life.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tyler2015


Joined: 16 Jul 2011
Posts: 1652
Location: D Town
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DrRay11 wrote:
qball8001 wrote:
LionsFan630 wrote:
People do realize that Davis and Stovall aren't under contract, right?

Only WR's under contract right now are:

84 Broyles, Ryan
13 Burleson, Nate
18 Burrell, Troy
83 Edwards, Patrick
10 Harris, Marcus
86 Hughes, Nate
81 Johnson, Calvin
12 Karstetter, Jared
11 Logan, Stefan
80 Long, Lance
19 Toliver, Terrence
16 Young, Titus

Also supposedly signed WR Wallace Miles UDFA out of North Carolina A&T today.

http://blogs.detroitlions.com/2012/05/14/source-lions-reach-roster-limit-with-signing-of-wr-wallace-miles/

So assuming we keep 5... Broyles, Burleson, Johnson, Young obviously. Final spot IMO comes down to Edwards and Logan. Could wind up keeping both if Broyles is placed on PUP.


CJ, Burleson, Titus, Broyles, Edwards to open day one. Practice Squad and eventual the new number 5 would be Miles...

Hell, what do I know though.


I think that's the right 5. Edwards over Logan.


Im liking Lance Long as a Hometown kid to make the Final 53
_________________

daboyle250 on the sig^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
IDOG_det


Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 11703
Location: here
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 6:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Didn't want to make a thread for this because the guy will be a rookie, but the Lions are trying out a German WR who is 6-5 220 pounds, and ran a 4.48 (apparently), and did 12 reps on the 225 bench. The WR's coach was somehow affiliated with Mayhew and sent Mayhew an email about the guy, and then some video and apparantly Mayhews interested enough to pay for the guys flight from Germany to Detroit. There is an article about it on the Lions website and he looks more like a TE to me in the video and slower than the 4.48 and bigger than the 220. He had some really good hands, but made a few catches close to his body that should have been made a little farther out. His coach said he is such a hard worker that he's the kind of guy that if he is on the practice squad at the beggininng of the year, then he'll be on the active roster not too long into the season. I'd like to see what this guy can do.
_________________
Kate Upton for sexy President!!!
Travi$ Scott is better than you

^^^^Kempes on the sig^^^^

"The original Ezekiel Ansah fan"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Detroit Lions All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 6 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group