| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Apodrocks 
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6083 Location: Detroit, Michigan.
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | Greg_Jennings wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | Apodrocks wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | Honestly, though, I'm not that big on JGL. |
Dude's a stud. |
Never really thought of him as an amazing actor. |
I think you need to watch the right movies then.  |
I have. I think he's overrated. |
What film do you think he received too much positive feedback for? _________________
^Packerbacker87 on the sig, thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ServantofYHWH
Joined: 25 Jan 2010 Posts: 8037 Location: Clutch City
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I wish I saw this thread sooner. I'm in on the next one. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011 Posts: 31526
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Apodrocks wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | Greg_Jennings wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | Apodrocks wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | Honestly, though, I'm not that big on JGL. |
Dude's a stud. |
Never really thought of him as an amazing actor. |
I think you need to watch the right movies then.  |
I have. I think he's overrated. |
What film do you think he received too much positive feedback for? |
Brick is one. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PurpleLion
Joined: 10 Apr 2010 Posts: 2067 Location: Baltimore Maryland
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I just realized that a majority have adaptations or superheroes for their film ideas, quite simple and boring in my opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011 Posts: 31526
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PurpleLion wrote: | | I just realized that a majority have adaptations or superheroes for their film ideas, quite simple and boring in my opinion. |
I disagree. If you're going straight from the comic or book, maybe, but if you are legitimately going to put time into adapting it...it can be really interesting. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PurpleLion
Joined: 10 Apr 2010 Posts: 2067 Location: Baltimore Maryland
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | PurpleLion wrote: | | I just realized that a majority have adaptations or superheroes for their film ideas, quite simple and boring in my opinion. |
I disagree. If you're going straight from the comic or book, maybe, but if you are legitimately going to put time into adapting it...it can be really interesting. | From the standpoint of inventing your characters, they're ready made and even brand names if we're talking about superheroes. The story is much easier to make. Limitations exist with the characters and they are already known for doing specific things or having a distinct personality. These bounds pretty much limit the risk of writing a nonsense story with your attempt. Inventing brand new characters or original ideas is greater risk and reward as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kiltman 
Joined: 25 Nov 2007 Posts: 11022 Location: Flipadelphia
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jrry32 wrote: | | PurpleLion wrote: | | I just realized that a majority have adaptations or superheroes for their film ideas, quite simple and boring in my opinion. |
I disagree. If you're going straight from the comic or book, maybe, but if you are legitimately going to put time into adapting it...it can be really interesting. |
I agree jrry, not just because I'm doing one
But at least for myself I'm re-writing almost everything, and using only really the setting and basic setup. I think I have a pretty good story to go with what would visually be a stunning film.
I guess I see where you are coming from PL, but I'd say wait and judge them at the end. Some of the greatest films of all time have been adaptations. There is no reason a movie based off a book or comicbook character or anything should be any less interesting or as good as an original idea. Especially with CBMs, there almost never is a page to film adaptation...the stories are original and just take certain elements of the character and settings. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011 Posts: 31526
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PurpleLion wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | PurpleLion wrote: | | I just realized that a majority have adaptations or superheroes for their film ideas, quite simple and boring in my opinion. |
I disagree. If you're going straight from the comic or book, maybe, but if you are legitimately going to put time into adapting it...it can be really interesting. | From the standpoint of inventing your characters, they're ready made and even brand names if we're talking about superheroes. The story is much easier to make. Limitations exist with the characters and they are already known for doing specific things or having a distinct personality. These bounds pretty much limit the risk of writing a nonsense story with your attempt. Inventing brand new characters or original ideas is greater risk and reward as well. |
Not exactly. In my adaptation, I am making a lot of changes. One of the things I'm doing is making some of the characters more dynamic and conflicted to kind of muddy the waters some so it's less straight forward.
I had my own story that I had already come up with but I'm actually looking at it as a book idea and I haven't ironed things out yet on it. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darrelle Revis 
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 8481 Location: The []_[]niversity of Miami
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2012 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I only did one loose adaptation (the Apollo one which I think was my best work).
Pretty sure I'm gonna do something set in Ancient Rome next draft. _________________
"I am the storm, my lord. The first storm, and the last." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PurpleLion
Joined: 10 Apr 2010 Posts: 2067 Location: Baltimore Maryland
|
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 1:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Kiltman wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | PurpleLion wrote: | | I just realized that a majority have adaptations or superheroes for their film ideas, quite simple and boring in my opinion. |
I disagree. If you're going straight from the comic or book, maybe, but if you are legitimately going to put time into adapting it...it can be really interesting. |
I agree jrry, not just because I'm doing one
But at least for myself I'm re-writing almost everything, and using only really the setting and basic setup. I think I have a pretty good story to go with what would visually be a stunning film.
I guess I see where you are coming from PL, but I'd say wait and judge them at the end. Some of the greatest films of all time have been adaptations. There is no reason a movie based off a book or comicbook character or anything should be any less interesting or as good as an original idea. Especially with CBMs, there almost never is a page to film adaptation...the stories are original and just take certain elements of the character and settings. | Each are good points and the product is what's important. Books take more adapting than comics or tv shows and often don't resemble the film. There's already a representation of how comics or tv shows will appear when filmed. You don't have the same with books and maybe that's why they haven't been adapted as much like in the previous. Advancements in technology make it easier to accurately represent comics or tv shows rather than guessing the meaning of books and writing dialogue in attempting to express that meaning also. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg_Jennings 
Joined: 06 Nov 2006 Posts: 22849 Location: Milwaukee
|
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'll probably be able to reveal the main plot of my movie after my next pick, although anyone familiar with the story probably can guess it. _________________
In the end, it wasn't guns or bombs that defeated the aliens. It was the humblest of all God's creatures, the Tyrannosaurus Rex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg_Jennings 
Joined: 06 Nov 2006 Posts: 22849 Location: Milwaukee
|
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ServantofYHWH wrote: | | I wish I saw this thread sooner. I'm in on the next one. |
Yeah, we do these all the time, so don't worry. _________________
In the end, it wasn't guns or bombs that defeated the aliens. It was the humblest of all God's creatures, the Tyrannosaurus Rex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011 Posts: 31526
|
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| PurpleLion wrote: | | Kiltman wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | PurpleLion wrote: | | I just realized that a majority have adaptations or superheroes for their film ideas, quite simple and boring in my opinion. |
I disagree. If you're going straight from the comic or book, maybe, but if you are legitimately going to put time into adapting it...it can be really interesting. |
I agree jrry, not just because I'm doing one
But at least for myself I'm re-writing almost everything, and using only really the setting and basic setup. I think I have a pretty good story to go with what would visually be a stunning film.
I guess I see where you are coming from PL, but I'd say wait and judge them at the end. Some of the greatest films of all time have been adaptations. There is no reason a movie based off a book or comicbook character or anything should be any less interesting or as good as an original idea. Especially with CBMs, there almost never is a page to film adaptation...the stories are original and just take certain elements of the character and settings. | Each are good points and the product is what's important. Books take more adapting than comics or tv shows and often don't resemble the film. There's already a representation of how comics or tv shows will appear when filmed. You don't have the same with books and maybe that's why they haven't been adapted as much like in the previous. Advancements in technology make it easier to accurately represent comics or tv shows rather than guessing the meaning of books and writing dialogue in attempting to express that meaning also. |
I'll tell you, the toughest thing in adapting the book isn't cutting out parts to make the movie an acceptable length...it's trying to transition the inner thoughts to an expressible way in film. In the book, you can read their inner most thoughts which gives you important parts of the plot and insight into the character, you just can't do that in a movie. I'm currently working through that issue right now. Have to find a way to make that transition while also hitting on the key parts of the plot without having too much plot. It's tough. And on top of that, I'm trying to add more depth and make characters more dynamic. Lol this is going to be quite time consuming.  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Greg_Jennings 
Joined: 06 Nov 2006 Posts: 22849 Location: Milwaukee
|
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
FYI, I'll be going to a concert Tuesday night, so send your picks for then to Darrelle Revis, or someone that'll be on then. I should be able to get my next pick in before I leave. _________________
In the end, it wasn't guns or bombs that defeated the aliens. It was the humblest of all God's creatures, the Tyrannosaurus Rex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Irish 11 

Joined: 14 Feb 2006 Posts: 8114 Location: Steelers Nation
|
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Sources indicate that Samuel L. Jackson will be reprising his role as Nick Fury in Marvel Studios production of S.H.I.E.L.D.. After the tremendous success of Avengers and its sequel Avengers 2, Our source states that this foray into the Marvelverse will focus on the espionage organization S.H.I.E.L.D. and its efforts to combat the activities of terrorist organizations. All evidence points to a film focusing on characters who have played a secondary role thus far in the series of Marvel productions and who do not possess superpowers, but are heroes in their own right.
 _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|