Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Packages You'd like to see
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Dallas Cowboys
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dirk Gently


Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 5098
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 9:25 am    Post subject: Packages You'd like to see Reply with quote

I was just commenting in the Jenkins thread about using Johnson exclusively as a single safety in a 4 CB nickel package as a way to take advantage of his talents while only giving him one package to learn at first.

Another idea I like is a 5-1-5 nickel. With Lee and Carter's range and Lee's demonstrated cover ability, plus (assuming we keep Jenkins) the ability to put four CBs in man coverage gives us, I think, the ability to play some interesting 6 man coverage packages while rushing 5 (Ware/Lissemore/Ratliff/Crawford/Spemcer, perhaps?)

What are some personnel packages or formations you'd like to see?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Desperado82


Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 18737
Location: Maryland
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 10:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
By keeping Jenkins, it really gives Ryan a lot to work with in the secondary. Here would be our base formation in a regular secondary package:

LCB - Carr
LSafety - Pool/Johnson
RSafety - Sensabaugh
RCB - Claiborne

When we go to our nickel package (something we ran quite a lot last year if I recall correctly), Ryan could really get creative if he wanted to, and run something like this:

LCB - Carr
LSafety - Pool/Johnson
RSafety - Jenkins
Nickel - Scandrick
RCB - Claiborne

Jenkins isn't exactly ever been a slouch in coverage, and with his recent willingness to stick his neck out there and make a tackle, he'd be great as a rover in the backfield alongside Pool or Johnson. This would allow Scandrick to play the nickel, which is his strong suit and still keep Claiborne and Carr on the field as well. Not to mention give us three players (four if you want to count Scandrick) who have been known to create turnovers.


Our "base" 3-4 defense
LDE - Spears/Crawford
NT - Ratliff
RDE - Lissemore

SOLB - Spencer
SILB - Lee
WILB - Carter/Connor
WOLB - Ware

LCB - Carr
LSafety - Pool
RSafety - Sensabaugh
RCB - Claiborne


A "base" 4-3 Formation

LDE - Spencer or Wilber or Crawford
NT - Brent or Lissemore or Spears
UT - Ratliff
RDE - Ware

SLB - Connor
MLB - Lee
WLB - Carter

LCB - Carr
LSafety - Pool
RSafety - Sensabaugh
RCB - Claiborne


A 4-2-5 package (as you mentioned)

LDE - Spencer/Wilber/Butler
NT - Brent/Lissemore/Spears
UT - Ratliff
RDE - Ware

SILB - Lee
WILB - Carter/Connor

LCB - Carr
LSafety - Johnson
RSafety - Jenkins
RCB - Claiborne
Nickel - Scandrick


A 3-3-5 Package

LDE - Spears
NT - Ratliff
RDE - Lissemore

SOLB - Carter/Connor
MLB - Lee
WOLB - Ware

LCB - Carr
LSafety - Johnson
RSafety - Jenkins
RCB - Claiborne
Nickel - Scandrick


A 5-2-4 "Shoot The Gap" Formation

LDE - Brent
LDT - Ratliff
RDT - Ware
RDE - Spears
3DE - Lissemore

SILB - Lee
WILB - Carter

LCB - Carr
LSafety - Johnson
RSafety - Sensabaugh
RCB - Claiborne



Just a few ideas....
_________________

^^^NS922

R.I.P. B2TB & SA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Dirk Gently


Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 5098
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd replace Spears with Hatcher in almost every one of those Smile
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DKDALfan


Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 1622
Location: Denmark
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
A 5-2-4 "Shoot The Gap" Formation

LDE - Brent
LDT - Ratliff
RDT - Ware
RDE - Spears
3DE - Lissemore


SILB - Lee
WILB - Carter

LCB - Carr
LSafety - Johnson
RSafety - Sensabaugh
RCB - Claiborne[/size]


Just a few ideas....


why?
_________________
The lonely supporter of Phil Costa..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Desperado82


Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 18737
Location: Maryland
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DKDALfan wrote:
Quote:
A 5-2-4 "Shoot The Gap" Formation

LDE - Brent
LDT - Ratliff
RDT - Ware
RDE - Spears
3DE - Lissemore


SILB - Lee
WILB - Carter

LCB - Carr
LSafety - Johnson
RSafety - Sensabaugh
RCB - Claiborne[/size]


Just a few ideas....


why?


Why what?
_________________

^^^NS922

R.I.P. B2TB & SA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
DKDALfan


Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 1622
Location: Denmark
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Desperado82 wrote:
DKDALfan wrote:
Quote:
A 5-2-4 "Shoot The Gap" Formation

LDE - Brent
LDT - Ratliff
RDT - Ware
RDE - Spears
3DE - Lissemore


SILB - Lee
WILB - Carter

LCB - Carr
LSafety - Johnson
RSafety - Sensabaugh
RCB - Claiborne[/size]


Just a few ideas....


why?


Why what?


why that D line? I see us getting killed on outside runs and quick passes to a RB.

I don't see the purpose of having Spears and Brent as DE's in that formation.
_________________
The lonely supporter of Phil Costa..


Last edited by DKDALfan on Sun May 27, 2012 1:43 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MaddHatter


Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 41592
Location: Dallas, TX
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ware Rat Brent Liss Spencer
.................Lee
Clai Scan Pool Jenk Carr
_________________

Ware Stat Tracker: 27 Pressures, 9 Hits, 10 sacks, 4 FF, 7 TFL (thru 8 games)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Desperado82


Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 18737
Location: Maryland
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 1:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DKDALfan wrote:
Desperado82 wrote:
DKDALfan wrote:
Quote:
A 5-2-4 "Shoot The Gap" Formation

LDE - Brent
LDT - Ratliff
RDT - Ware
RDE - Spears
3DE - Lissemore


SILB - Lee
WILB - Carter

LCB - Carr
LSafety - Johnson
RSafety - Sensabaugh
RCB - Claiborne[/size]


Just a few ideas....


why?


Why what?


why that D line? I see us getting killed on outside runs and quick passes to a RB.

I don't see the purpose of having Spears and Brent as DE's in that formation.


The idea is to get to the QB as soon as possible. Who would you favor in a matchup? Ware or a center? Spears and Brent are there to draw double teams away from Ware and Ratliff to try and get to the QB in a split second.

You have Lee and Carter, two players who are known for their sideline-to-sideline ability in the middle to prevent those quick passes and outside runs from burning the team in case the inside rushers don't get to the QB right away. Johnson could also play closer to the line of scrimmage, sort of like a 3rd linebacker, to provide aid as well.
_________________

^^^NS922

R.I.P. B2TB & SA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
SHSTE92


Joined: 08 Jan 2006
Posts: 2841
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 2:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Base Defense:

....................Lissemore........Brent.........Ratliff..................

..........Spencer.............Connor........Lee.............Ware.......

..Carr................................................................................Jenkins

.......................Sens................................Pool..................
_________________

Me on the sig Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
plan9misfit


FF Fanatic
Most Valuable Poster (5th Ballot)
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 18097
Location: RIP: B2TB, T14, & S.A. We miss you.
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No rational human being should want to use any gimmick college defense at any point. A 5-1-5, 4-2-5, or a 3-3-5? Really??? Are you people nuts? When defenses like that give up massive amounts of yardage and points at the collegiate level, how much do you think they'd give up at the pro level?

Seriously, those defenses are NOT the way to go.
_________________

Co-Founder: DCRA - No McQuistan, No Super Bowl
The_Slamman wrote:
It's like we are in a win now mentality with lose now personnel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Desperado82


Global Moderator
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 18737
Location: Maryland
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 2:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

plan9misfit wrote:
No rational human being should want to use any gimmick college defense at any point. A 5-1-5, 4-2-5, or a 3-3-5? Really??? Are you people nuts? When defenses like that give up massive amounts of yardage and points at the collegiate level, how much do you think they'd give up at the pro level?

Seriously, those defenses are NOT the way to go.


Maybe not your traditional packages you see at the college level, but we've seen them used in different variations at the pro level before. If I'm not mistaken, Ryan has used somewhat similar formations before and they've been effective.
_________________

^^^NS922

R.I.P. B2TB & SA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Dirk Gently


Joined: 04 Jun 2008
Posts: 5098
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

plan9misfit wrote:
No rational human being should want to use any gimmick college defense at any point. A 5-1-5, 4-2-5, or a 3-3-5? Really???


Um... doesn't just about everybody in the NFL run out one of those two as a nickel package at some point every game?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Texas_OutLaw7


Most Valuable Poster (6th Ballot)

FF Fanatic

Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 19736
Location: Cowboys Forum ROH Class of '12
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

plan9misfit wrote:
No rational human being should want to use any gimmick college defense at any point. A 5-1-5, 4-2-5, or a 3-3-5? Really??? Are you people nuts? When defenses like that give up massive amounts of yardage and points at the collegiate level, how much do you think they'd give up at the pro level?

Seriously, those defenses are NOT the way to go.


I love the 3-3-5! That is the base Defense I would run if I was a coach. Laughing
_________________


In Redball I Trust!
The price of progress is trusting the process.
Heart. Leadership. Passion. Will.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The_Slamman


Joined: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 11669
Location: Las Vegas, NV
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 10:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MaddHatter wrote:
Ware Rat Brent Liss Spencer
.................Lee
Clai Scan Pool Jenk Carr


MH, when Dirk asked you to list the "packages" you'd like to see, he was referring to "football" packages.
_________________
Quote from May 7, 2013...

MaddHatter wrote:
Brian Price is still as talented as he ever was.


On May 9th, 2013, Brian Price was waived by the Dallas Cowboys.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheStarStillShines


Joined: 12 Oct 2004
Posts: 8283
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 11:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On 3rd-and-long, I would like to see a 1-4-6 package.

DL - Ratliff
LBs - Ware, Lee, Carter, Spencer, and Butler/Wilbur
DBs - Carr, Jenkins, Claiborne, Scandrick, Pool, and Sensabaugh.

Have the LBs and 2 safeties moving around the line of scrimmage with all of them showing blitz. Then have two of them moving back in coverage - with one safety going deep and one LB (even Ware) playing deep middle or covering the TE.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Dallas Cowboys All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group