Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Aaron Rodgers' Next Contract
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
GBPACKMAN4LIFE


Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 16365
Location: Spokane, WA
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LUKE232323 wrote:
Is there any confirmation if this is a 5 year deal that is in place of the three years he currently has, or 5 years in addition to the three years (so through 2019)?


Only info so far is the tweet from LeRoy, I believe. Take that for what it's worth (not a lot).
_________________

cpnesdude41 wrote:
hope you guys aren't at work.. cuz ur about to get bonerzz.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JustisM


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 16605
Location: Hood River, Oregon
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 5:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LUKE232323 wrote:
Is there any confirmation if this is a 5 year deal that is in place of the three years he currently has, or 5 years in addition to the three years (so through 2019)?


I have no idea but my educated guess would say 5 years total. Rodgers has stated several times that he doesn't want to play forever and I can't see him playing for the money he has right now and have it double in like 3 years instead of kicking in right now.

Also something I can see Rodgers doing: getting paid like 20 mil a year but ends up taking a couple pay cuts to keep "his boys" in Green Bay. I could see him cutting off some of the salary to convince TT to keep Jennings or the OL together. Money=power.
_________________
[quote="TytybearsFan21"]Drive off into the sunset, you brilliant bastard.[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kampman74


Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 5560
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 7:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Man would cheer me up on a crappy weekend thats for sure!!
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChaRisMa


Joined: 08 Mar 2007
Posts: 5329
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm pretty sure it'd have to be an extension in order to follow salary cap rules. I won't be excited if this is not an extension. I don't want to pay anyone 20M per. That's just too many eggs in one basket.

If it's an extension, his contract would be for 8 years, 123.75M. Averages out to 15.46875M per year. To Aaron, it's a hell of a lot less risk, and a 50% raise. To Green Bay, it's betting he doesn't get injured, locking up the Franchise, and managing money more safely.

It's also a huge kick to the proverbial nuts of Drew Brees. He's supposed to be the Franchise in NO and they refuse to give him what he wants. Green Bay and Aaron Rodgers get a deal done three years early. ouch!
_________________
Ted Thompson wrote:
I'm new school.
Santana Dotson wrote:
"I've always told people that you had your mom and dad looking out for your best interests, and then you had Reggie White.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
blankman0021


Joined: 02 May 2007
Posts: 1423
Location: Eau Claire
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:57 pm    Post subject: Re: Aaron Rodgers' Next Contract Reply with quote

CWood21 wrote:
RashaanSalaami wrote:
Why would anyone in the organization tweet something like that? Does Adam Schefter work for all organizations?


What I was getting at is that I don't think he has the connections to the organization's front office to actually support that tweet.


No, but I'm sure he still has connections with some of the current players.
_________________

^^.flash

Read More. Post Less. Unless you're on Twitter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ArodFanboy


Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 2345
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think anywhere from 15 to 19 million is pretty acceptable for the team. I never am in favor of paying 20+ million for one guy even a player like Rodgers. I think Aaron really loves this team and sees the potential long-term success he is set up for here, and makes the contract a much less bigger issue than Drew Brees has allowed his to become.
_________________


^Kempes on the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RashaanSalaami


Global Moderator
Most Valuable Poster
Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 29100
Location: Jersey
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

According to Wilde, he checked in with Rodgers' agent, David Dunn who said "100% false. There have been zero negotations. Nothing."
_________________
Top 50 Franchise Cornerstones (2012) - COMPLETED!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Sandybaby716


Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 3526
Location: Rhode Island
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RashaanSalaami wrote:
According to Wilde, he checked in with Rodgers' agent, David Dunn who said "100% false. There have been zero negotations. Nothing."


Makes sense. We have higher priorities right now with guys who will not be under contract following this season. Gotta find the space for them first. Then Clay, BJ, and Finley are next.
_________________
wgbeethree wrote:
In all fairness it is kind of rude to just lay injured at their feet while the Lions defensive players are trying to hold a completely unrelated dance party.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PackersGuy


Joined: 01 May 2007
Posts: 593
Location: Syracuse,Ny
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

5yr 100 mil
6yr 100mil
7yr 120mil

50-70 mill gaurnteed

he will get 20 mil or more a yr

just hope gb saves money for clay
_________________
MUCHO PROPS! to my man,BlueQuickSilver for the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDN40


Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 3120
PostPosted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 10:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like QB money has doubled in 4 years.

Nothing cap friendly about that
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
WIsportsfan


Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 2061
PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regardless of the cap, it's a no brainer to get this done. Do not want anything close to what is happening between Brees and the Saints to creep up here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TedThompson


Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 802
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From Tommy Silverstein:

-With all their draft picks signed and no veteran holdouts pending, the #Packers are $11 million under the salary cap. That should give them room to do the Greg Jennings and Clay Matthews deals this year.

They'll be able to burn some of the charges in 2012, but they'll still have to amortize signing bonuses because those deals will not be for chump change.

There will be significant upfront money paid if they are able to reach agreements with both players.

Matthews is only slated to make a Walmart like $800K this year.
_________________
"It's the same old Jay," Woodson told ESPN afterward. "We just need to be in position. Jay will throw us the ball."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CentralFC


Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 2143
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 8:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TedThompson wrote:
From Tommy Silverstein:

-With all their draft picks signed and no veteran holdouts pending, the #Packers are $11 million under the salary cap. That should give them room to do the Greg Jennings and Clay Matthews deals this year.

They'll be able to burn some of the charges in 2012, but they'll still have to amortize signing bonuses because those deals will not be for chump change.

There will be significant upfront money paid if they are able to reach agreements with both players.

Matthews is only slated to make a Walmart like $800K this year.


That last part is incredible.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
spilltray


Joined: 09 Jan 2006
Posts: 8650
Location: Green Bay, WI
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CentralFC wrote:
TedThompson wrote:
From Tommy Silverstein:

-With all their draft picks signed and no veteran holdouts pending, the #Packers are $11 million under the salary cap. That should give them room to do the Greg Jennings and Clay Matthews deals this year.

They'll be able to burn some of the charges in 2012, but they'll still have to amortize signing bonuses because those deals will not be for chump change.

There will be significant upfront money paid if they are able to reach agreements with both players.

Matthews is only slated to make a Walmart like $800K this year.


That last part is incredible.


Not really, it's pretty normal for a late 1st rounder.
_________________
Wilfred wrote:
Memory is like the Packers when they are behind by two touchdowns in the 4th quarter... It comes back.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
TheClayMaker52


Joined: 10 Aug 2011
Posts: 644
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

spilltray wrote:
CentralFC wrote:
TedThompson wrote:
From Tommy Silverstein:

-With all their draft picks signed and no veteran holdouts pending, the #Packers are $11 million under the salary cap. That should give them room to do the Greg Jennings and Clay Matthews deals this year.

They'll be able to burn some of the charges in 2012, but they'll still have to amortize signing bonuses because those deals will not be for chump change.

There will be significant upfront money paid if they are able to reach agreements with both players.

Matthews is only slated to make a Walmart like $800K this year.


That last part is incredible.


Not really, it's pretty normal for a late 1st rounder.


I think he is saying its incredible in the fact that Matthews hasn't said a peep about his contract the whole time (even though he has clearly outplayed it)
_________________
x0x wrote:

Mike McCarthy was great, but he had a Super Bowl team. He should have gone 16-0. This 15-1 is not as impressive as the Vikings going 15-1 in 98.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group