Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Who should start at QB in Seattle?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 15, 16, 17  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who should start at QB for the Seahawks?
Matt Flynn
70%
 70%  [ 155 ]
Tarvaris Jackson
7%
 7%  [ 16 ]
Russell Wilson
22%
 22%  [ 50 ]
Total Votes : 221

Author Message
Bohlmann20


Joined: 22 Mar 2012
Posts: 5138
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AlexGreen#20 wrote:

UW played 3.5 games against real defenses. OSU, MSU 2X and Illinois. Big 10 wasn't exactly the SEC this year.


Yet that is still a far harder defensive schedule than Gabbert ever had to face. Which is my point.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketchup


Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 10988
Location: .flash on the avy
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Django wrote:
Ketchup wrote:
Django wrote:
Last time Flynn competed for a starting job...He lost to a guy named Russell.. Laughing Laughing
Yea Flynn lost to a guy that was an NFL 1st round pick and then came back the next year and won the National championship once Russell was gone.


*sigh* Russell.... as in JaMarcus....now "Russell" Wilson...

This was no knock on either.
Ok, i feel stupid. MY bad. Embarassed Laughing
_________________

Kempes on the custom sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Seahawks206


Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 253
Location: Your Girl's Bed
PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fired-Up wrote:
Seahawks206 wrote:
Fired-Up wrote:
Seahawks206 wrote:
Am I the only person that watched NFL32 today and saw them talking about how Wilson is outshining TJax and Flynn at training camp?


Like I said. It will be a whole new ball game when the 49ers are raining down on his butt.


Is it fair for me to say that your statement is also true for Matt Flynn? And do you realize Wilson is playing against one of if not the best secondary in the league every day in practice? Seattle's defense is better than pretty much all of the defenses he will face this year with the exception of SF


No it's not fair. Flynn has proven that he can handle NFL DEFENSES. Russell has proven jack against NFL defenses. He might just crumble like Gabbert at the sight of an NFL lineman coming to destroy him.


The Patriots and Lions arent exactly the best examples of NFL defenses but i get what youre saying
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
DawgX


Joined: 08 Aug 2006
Posts: 9909
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm almost positive Flynn will start. If he doesn't play well in the first half of the season then I could see Wilson taking over, who I was a big fan of heading into the draft.
_________________
Cleveland Browns Forum Hall of Fame Inductee



Kiltman on the great sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SaveourSonics


Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45445
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 4:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Seattle fans need to lay off the Russell Wilson koolaid.

This is Matt Flynn's job, absolutely no questions asked.
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Pugger


Joined: 01 May 2010
Posts: 4350
Location: N. Fort Myers, FL
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bohlmann20 wrote:
Fired-Up wrote:
Seahawks206 wrote:
Fired-Up wrote:
Seahawks206 wrote:
Am I the only person that watched NFL32 today and saw them talking about how Wilson is outshining TJax and Flynn at training camp?


Like I said. It will be a whole new ball game when the 49ers are raining down on his butt.


Is it fair for me to say that your statement is also true for Matt Flynn? And do you realize Wilson is playing against one of if not the best secondary in the league every day in practice? Seattle's defense is better than pretty much all of the defenses he will face this year with the exception of SF


No it's not fair. Flynn has proven that he can handle NFL DEFENSES. Russell has proven jack against NFL defenses. He might just crumble like Gabbert at the sight of an NFL lineman coming to destroy him.


In all fairness Gabbert sucked in college too [against easy defenses (Big XII)] and Wilson rocked in college [hard defenses (B1G)].


I love Wilson but he did have problems in big games at WI last year. He threw a couple of bad INTs in the Rose Bowl for one. Sad

Flynn might not have the strongest arm in camp but he has a certain je ne sais quoi about him. He shines when the spot light is on and that is what you want in an NFL starting QB.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
EliteTexan80


Most Valuable Poster
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 37195
Location: Three time Mr. fanTASTic!
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SaveourSonics wrote:
Seattle fans need to lay off the Russell Wilson koolaid.

This is Matt Flynn's job, absolutely no questions asked.


That's my train of thought. Things will be REALLY bad if Wilson beats out Flynn. I get it that Wilson is right now doing his best Doug Flutie impression, but he's still a rookie with a lot to learn. Maybe in a year or two he's ready to start and a real QB comp could be had...but for now, you better wish that Flynn gets the start.
_________________

iPwn, Kempes and Flaccomania: The official sig makers for THE ET80!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
goldfishwars


Joined: 27 Mar 2011
Posts: 5350
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 8:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think there's a good chance Russell Wilson will be starting before the season is out.
_________________


Thanks Duron Harmon!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
onejayhawk


Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 5056
Location: Waco, Tx
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bad and worse. Wilson is the future, but Flynn will have to do for now.

J
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
steadypimpin


Joined: 01 Jan 2009
Posts: 7278
Location: Rockville, Maryland
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think they should start TJax. Me being a Niner fan would love that. Laughing
_________________

2011 & 2012 NFC West Champs!!! Back to back baby!!!
Xbox: Steadypimpin49
"Keep choppin' wood"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RyanFuller003


Moderator
Joined: 07 Jan 2007
Posts: 19880
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 10:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

At this point, we already know who Tarvaris Jackson is and what he brings to the table--and it's not much. There's really no point in starting him because he's a six-year veteran that just doesn't offer much in the way of upside.

Matt Flynn got paid $24 million over 3 years, and I doubt they spent that money with aims to keep him on the bench. It's pretty obvious they're paying him to be a starter, so I think unless he's really disappointing in camp, the job is his. And it should be. He's only received significant playing time in three games, but he at least offers some kind of upside, unlike Jackson. He's been up-and-down in his three games (he was awful against the Lions in 2010, but looked good against the Patriots the next week, and he murdered the Lions in week 17 last year). Personally, I think they paid him too much based on a very small sample size, and I'm not sold on him as a long-term solution, but they can't just sit him.

As for Russell Wilson, he's an experienced college quarterback, but he's not a particularly impressive physical specimen and will probably have to spend a year or two as a student before he's ready to get on the field. The Seahawks aren't an especially strong team, particularly when it comes to receiving targets, so it'd be smart of them to stash Wilson for a while until they can get some more talented receivers.
_________________

MrDrew wrote:
I may have to find a taxidermist that will make me a koozie out of a squirrel in a kilt now.

Adopt-a-Lion: Don Muhlbach
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
milanb


Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 5174
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 10:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

RyanFuller003 wrote:
At this point, we already know who Tarvaris Jackson is and what he brings to the table--and it's not much. There's really no point in starting him because he's a six-year veteran that just doesn't offer much in the way of upside.

Matt Flynn got paid $24 million over 3 years, and I doubt they spent that money with aims to keep him on the bench. It's pretty obvious they're paying him to be a starter, so I think unless he's really disappointing in camp, the job is his. And it should be. He's only received significant playing time in three games, but he at least offers some kind of upside, unlike Jackson. He's been up-and-down in his three games (he was awful against the Lions in 2010, but looked good against the Patriots the next week, and he murdered the Lions in week 17 last year). Personally, I think they paid him too much based on a very small sample size, and I'm not sold on him as a long-term solution, but they can't just sit him.

As for Russell Wilson, he's an experienced college quarterback, but he's not a particularly impressive physical specimen and will probably have to spend a year or two as a student before he's ready to get on the field. The Seahawks aren't an especially strong team, particularly when it comes to receiving targets, so it'd be smart of them to stash Wilson for a while until they can get some more talented receivers.


The two big issues with Tarvaris Jackson in Minnesota were the fact that he was very injury prone, and that he became tentative on the field when things didn't go his way.

That said, I am not at all sold on Matt Flynn. There's a huge difference between stepping into a well-polished offence with three Pro Bowl receivers to throw to vs. being a full-time starter over a full season with no talent around you. I see him struggling big-time.
_________________

The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. — Ecclesiastes 9:11

But that’s the way to bet. — Jimmy The Greek
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SaveourSonics


Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45445
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

milanb wrote:
That said, I am not at all sold on Matt Flynn. There's a huge difference between stepping into a well-polished offence with three Pro Bowl receivers to throw to vs. being a full-time starter over a full season with no talent around you. I see him struggling big-time.


He didn't even have Greg Jennings in that record-setting game. Who's the 3rd Probowler?
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
milanb


Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 5174
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SaveourSonics wrote:
milanb wrote:
That said, I am not at all sold on Matt Flynn. There's a huge difference between stepping into a well-polished offence with three Pro Bowl receivers to throw to vs. being a full-time starter over a full season with no talent around you. I see him struggling big-time.


He didn't even have Greg Jennings in that record-setting game. Who's the 3rd Probowler?


Yeah, you're right. Flynn had to make do with Donald Driver, Jordy Nelson and TE Jermichael Finley.
_________________

The race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. — Ecclesiastes 9:11

But that’s the way to bet. — Jimmy The Greek
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
klyon7634


Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 7427
Location: New York
PostPosted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

milanb wrote:
SaveourSonics wrote:
milanb wrote:
That said, I am not at all sold on Matt Flynn. There's a huge difference between stepping into a well-polished offence with three Pro Bowl receivers to throw to vs. being a full-time starter over a full season with no talent around you. I see him struggling big-time.


He didn't even have Greg Jennings in that record-setting game. Who's the 3rd Probowler?


Yeah, you're right. Flynn had to make do with Donald Driver, Jordy Nelson and TE Jermichael Finley.


we have no talent?? huh

Sidney Rice
Doug Baldwin
Ricardo Lockette
Golden Tate
Braylon Edwards
Zach Miller
Kellen Winslow
Marshawn Lynch

i would love to have all those recievers and Beast Mode to run the the ball if i was a QB. But yea your right just because your not a seahawks fan and havent heard of a few of those guys means they have no talent Rolling Eyes
_________________



Seahawks~ Yankees~ Knicks~ Syracuse Orange
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL General All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 15, 16, 17  Next
Page 5 of 17

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group