| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Gtek06
Joined: 12 Mar 2012 Posts: 178
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 7:57 pm Post subject: 2012-2013 NFL season Predictions |
|
|
|
2012 Regular season records for all 32 teams
32.Miami Dolphins 2-14
31.Cleveland Browns 3-13
30.Oakland Raiders 3-13
29.Minnesota Vikings 4-12
28.Indianapolis Colts 4-12
27.Jacksonville Jaguars 4-12
26.Arizona Cardinals 4-12
25.Washington Redskins 5-11
24.St. Louis Rams 6-10
23.Tampa Bay Bucs 6-10
22.Kansas city Cheifs 6-10
21.Seatle Seahawks 7-9
20.Tennesse Titans 7-9
19.San Diego Chargers 8-8
18.Carolina Panthers 8-8
17.Buffalo Bills 8-8
16.New Orleans Saints 9-7
15.Baltimore Ravens 9-7
14.Dallas Cowboys 9-7
13.Chicago Bears 9-7
12.Pittsburgh Steelers 10-6 #6 Seed in AFC
11.Detriot Lions 10-6 #6 Seed in NFC
10.Denver Broncos 10-6 #4 Seed in AFC
9.Atlanta Falcons 10-6 #4 Seed in NFC
8.New York Jets 11-5 #5 Seed in AFC
7.Cincinatti Bengals 11-5 #3 Seed in AFC
6.San Fransisco 49ers 11-5 #3 Seed in NFC
5.New York Giants 11-5 #5 Seed in NFC
4.Houston Texans 12-4 #2 Seed in AFC
3.Green Bay Packers 12-4 #2 Seed in NFC
2.Philledelphia Eagles 13-3 #1 Seed in NFC
1.New England Patriots 13-3 #1 Seed in AFC
Regular Season Stat Leaders
Passing-
1.Tom Brady 5,287 Yards 44 TDs 11 INTs
2.Matthew Stafford 5,041 Yards 38 TDs 9 INTs
3.Drew Brees 4,974 Yards 42 TDs 12 INTs
4.Aaron Rodgers 4,811 Yards 40 TDs 7 INTs
5.Phillip Rivers 4,612 Yards 24 TDs 16 INTs
Rushing-
1.Arian Foster 1,688 Yards 10 TDs
2.LeSean McCoy 1,449 Yards 9 TDs
3.MArshawn Lynch 1,358 Yards 8 TDs
4.Ray Rice 1,289 Yards 11 TDs
5.Chris Johnson 1,203 Yards 7 TDs
Reciving-
1.Calvin Johnson 1,819 Yards 106 RECs 14 TDs
2.Larry Fitzgerald 1,516 Yards 81 RECs 9 TDs
3.Victor Cruz 1,470 Yards 78 RECs 11 TDs
4.Roddy White 1,439 Yards 96 RECs 7 TDs
5.Brandon Marshall 1,386 Yards 72 RECs 13 TDs
Offense-
1.Philedelphia Eagles 441 YPG 31.5 PPG
2.New England Patriots 427 YPG 30.4 PPG
3.Detriot Lions 413 YPG 28.8 PPG
4.New Orleans Saints 401 YPG 25.4 PPG
5.Carolina Panthers 393 YPG 27.1 PPG
Defense-
1.Pittsburgh Steelers 273 YPG 15.1 PPG
2.San Fransisco 49ers 287 YPG 14.3 PPG
3.New York Jets 291 YPG 16.8 PPG
4.Cincinatti Bengals 304 YPG 17.6 PPG
5.Baltimore Ravens 316 YPG 20.3 PPG
Playoffs
AFC-
Wild Card
#3 Cincinatti Bengals Vs. #6 Pittsburgh Steelers, 20-14
#4 Denver Broncos VS. #5 New York Jets, 17-13
Divisional
#1 New England Patriots Vs. #6 Pittsburgh Steelers, 24-20
#2 Houston Texans Vs #5 New York Jets, 28-23
AFC Championship
#2 Houston Texans Vs. #6 Pittsburgh Steelers, 21-10
NFC-
Wild Card
#3 San Fransisco 49ers Vs. #6 Detriot Lions, 21-20
#4 Atlanta Falcons Vs. #5 New York Giants, 27-17
Divisional
#1 Philadelphia Eagles Vs. #5 New York Giants, 31-28
#2 Green Bay Packers Vs. #3 San Fransisco 49ers, 20-14
NFC Championship
#1 Philadelphia Eagles Vs. #2 Green Bay Packers, 27-21
Superbowl
#1 Philadelphia Eagles Vs. #2 Houston Texans, 30-24
Philadelphia Eagles 2012-2013 NFL super bowl Champions (13-3)(3-0) _________________
Thanks to Jamison. on the sig. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zacapr22
Joined: 03 Jan 2011 Posts: 897 Location: East
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Very solid and realistic predictions. Nothing seems homeristic or unrealistic.
*Edit.. except for Calvin Johnson having 1800+ receiving yards. No way he makes that many plays without missing playing time and defenses will find a way to stop him. _________________
Shout out to Tim Tebow, Mark Sanchez, and Carson Palmer for making our playoff hopes a reality
Last edited by zacapr22 on Thu Aug 02, 2012 8:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Steelerspower
Joined: 13 Jun 2011 Posts: 6640
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Beat the patriots on the road would be a incredible feeling _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
norcalraider510 
Joined: 12 Feb 2011 Posts: 6376 Location: The Itty Bitty City By The Water
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
hopefully your wrong, 3 wins sounds horrible
don't see us loosing more than 10 games if McFadden/Palmer stay healthy _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JaguarCrazy2832 
Joined: 28 Jun 2008 Posts: 73978
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
9 INTs for Stafford? As much as they pass, he might have 9 INTs by mid-season _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RandyMossIsBoss 
Joined: 01 Jun 2012 Posts: 8661 Location: Peppers90 on the sig, Kiltman on the avy
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Can't complain when I see you have the Eagles winnin the super bowl!
Although I don't think we'll see TWO if even one player throw for 5,000 yards again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010 Posts: 5732
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Packers arent a top 5 offense??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
OakRaiders3828 
Joined: 18 Aug 2007 Posts: 9267 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
3-13...well, I hope not. _________________
O A K L A N D R A I D E R S
Joe_is_the_best on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Redskins24-7 
Joined: 21 Oct 2008 Posts: 14661 Location: North Beach, MD
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Only team 5-11. Fascinating!  _________________ RIP SuperSkinFan
^^mike23md on the sig!^^
| Woz wrote: | You gents have more fartage than I.  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NickButera 
 Joined: 14 Sep 2009 Posts: 5099 Location: Nevada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I like em. My only quarrel is that there aren't very many "new" playoff contenders. Eagles and Jets. That's playing it pretty safe. Although it's hard to put it into prediction threads, historically there are much more 'new' playoff teams that than.
Second is just my opinion, and I'm a bit biased here, but I think you're selling the AFC West short. Raiders 3-13, Chiefs 6-10 and S.D 8-8 while Denver is only 9-7.... I think we'll do better than that. All 4 of our teams are talented enough where one of us will break out for a 10 win season at least. One of the other 3 remaining teams will prove to be very competitive and I think we've got a good chance of having 2 teams finishing over .500. Of course, which 2 of the 4 will come out, could be any of them. Personally I don't think any of us will be bottom of the barrel. _________________ Bah-Weep-Granah-Weep-Nini-Bong
My short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be.
Also, my short-term memory is not as sharp as it used to be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ketchup
Joined: 13 May 2009 Posts: 11172 Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MNPackfan32 wrote: | | Packers arent a top 5 offense??? | Yea, the offense that was #1 in PPG and the 2nd highest scoring offense in history the year before isn't going to be a top 5 offense even though we only lost 2 starters on offense. One was Ryan Grant, who was the "starter" but got outproduced by James Starks. The 2nd is Scott Wells who we replaced with Jeff Saturday, may have heard of him. We have the best QB in the league with arguably the best receiving corp and a rock solid o-line but won't finish top 5? EXPLAIN!
Oh, and for anybody saying last year was some how a fluky season... Every year Rodgers has been our starting QB, we've finished in the top 10. 3 out of the 4 years we've finished in the top 5. Let me say that again, 3 out of 4 years with Rodgers we've been a top 5 offense. And of course last year being the 2nd highest scoring offense in history. _________________
Kempes on the custom sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
D.Revis24
Joined: 02 Apr 2010 Posts: 3234
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
So you are predicting that 5,000+ yards passing wasn't a fluke and this is the way its going to be now? _________________
Props to El Ramster on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DawgX 
Joined: 08 Aug 2006 Posts: 10010
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Why do you think the Browns will regress and finish 3-13? Remember, they were two botched snaps on field goals from potentially being 6-10. Their defense was already very good last year and should only improve. The offense can't get any worse and should improve a good bit simply with the addition of Trent Richardson. If other offensive players improve like they should, then Cleveland's offense should actually be at least somewhat competent. _________________ Cleveland Browns Forum Hall of Fame Inductee
Kiltman on the great sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Willink 
Joined: 26 Nov 2007 Posts: 11024 Location: Albany, NY
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Ketchup wrote: | | MNPackfan32 wrote: | | Packers arent a top 5 offense??? | Yea, the offense that was #1 in PPG and the 2nd highest scoring offense in history the year before isn't going to be a top 5 offense even though we only lost 2 starters on offense. One was Ryan Grant, who was the "starter" but got outproduced by James Starks. The 2nd is Scott Wells who we replaced with Jeff Saturday, may have heard of him. We have the best QB in the league with arguably the best receiving corp and a rock solid o-line but won't finish top 5? EXPLAIN!
Oh, and for anybody saying last year was some how a fluky season... Every year Rodgers has been our starting QB, we've finished in the top 10. 3 out of the 4 years we've finished in the top 5. Let me say that again, 3 out of 4 years with Rodgers we've been a top 5 offense. And of course last year being the 2nd highest scoring offense in history. |
idk why you sound so exasperated over someones predictions lol
granted 40 TD's from Rodgers and GB scores less than 430 points while going 12-4 is probably impossible, but I don't think he was sitting there thinking about the above _________________
| Quote: | If I have not lost my mind I can sometimes hear it preparing to defect
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fired-Up
Joined: 27 Jul 2012 Posts: 788
|
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2012 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| D.Revis24 wrote: | | So you are predicting that 5,000+ yards passing wasn't a fluke and this is the way its going to be now? |
Well with 663 passing attempts it may be here to stay. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|