| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thelawoffices
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 14050
Location: Depths of Gillette Mountain
|
 Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 5:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I'd rank Barkley second behind Leinart, at the moment. He still has time to move into first.
_________________
| mission27 wrote: | | And she flips out like wtf I don't like that and I'm like you don't like rodents? |
#JDI |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
1King
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 33165
Location: daboyle250 on the sig.
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Any of you guys know how many OL you are targeting in the 2014 class? I know you already have 3 committed, are you guys done with those 3 or are you taking 4 (or more)?
_________________
| El ramster wrote: | | 1king showing why he's one the best posters in this site. |
| candyman93 wrote: | | 1king is showing why he's awesome |
TEAM STYLISH |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ohiogenius
Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 3301
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Just beat ND and all your sins will be forgiven. Especially as they will be rated hella high after they beat an overrated Michigan team
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bo_Spice
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 9687
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MSURacerDT55 wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | Matt Barkley proves why he'll never be on the same level as Matt Leinart, regardless of the numbers. Gotta win the big games, but we'll still beat Oregon and win the Rose Bowl at least. |
Where do you rank him on the totem of USC QB greats? |
I'd rank him second behind Leinart just because Leinart was able to win 2 national championships, a Heisman Trophy, and won a lot of big games in the clutch. Barkley's numbers will be better but it's obvious that he's not as good as Leinart was when he was at SC because he chokes when we need him most.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bo_Spice
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 9687
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Marqise Lee ~ 40 receptions, 460 yards, 6 TD's through four games. lol
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Shaq
Joined: 04 Jul 2009
Posts: 4440
Location: USC
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
So frustrating.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swoosh
Joined: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 9746
Location: europe
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bo_Spice wrote: | | Marqise Lee ~ 40 receptions, 460 yards, 6 TD's through four games. lol |
Kid is unbelievable. Oh how I wish Oregon had a talent like him at WR.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chillparsi1
Joined: 04 Oct 2005
Posts: 5707
Location: USC
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| swoosh wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | Marqise Lee ~ 40 receptions, 460 yards, 6 TD's through four games. lol |
Kid is unbelievable. Oh how I wish Oregon had a talent like him at WR. |
You already have DAT (yes I know he's RB...technically), don't get greedy 
_________________
Stone65 with the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
swoosh
Joined: 03 Dec 2010
Posts: 9746
Location: europe
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| chillparsi1 wrote: | | swoosh wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | Marqise Lee ~ 40 receptions, 460 yards, 6 TD's through four games. lol |
Kid is unbelievable. Oh how I wish Oregon had a talent like him at WR. |
You already have DAT (yes I know he's RB...technically), don't get greedy |
Lol, I know. Oregon is missing that big, physical WR who can line up outside and go up and get it though.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thelawoffices
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 14050
Location: Depths of Gillette Mountain
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bo_Spice wrote: | | MSURacerDT55 wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | Matt Barkley proves why he'll never be on the same level as Matt Leinart, regardless of the numbers. Gotta win the big games, but we'll still beat Oregon and win the Rose Bowl at least. |
Where do you rank him on the totem of USC QB greats? |
I'd rank him second behind Leinart just because Leinart was able to win 2 national championships, a Heisman Trophy, and won a lot of big games in the clutch. Barkley's numbers will be better but it's obvious that he's not as good as Leinart was when he was at SC because he chokes when we need him most. |
I love how we lose to Stanford and you just turn on Barkley.
It's a bit of a stretch to say he "chokes" when we need him the most. He had a bad game against Stanford, and had absolutely no help from the rest of his offense, especially the OL. It sucks, but it happens.
_________________
| mission27 wrote: | | And she flips out like wtf I don't like that and I'm like you don't like rodents? |
#JDI |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
coltsmanic808
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 4139
Location: []_[]
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| thelawoffices wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | MSURacerDT55 wrote: | | Bo_Spice wrote: | | Matt Barkley proves why he'll never be on the same level as Matt Leinart, regardless of the numbers. Gotta win the big games, but we'll still beat Oregon and win the Rose Bowl at least. |
Where do you rank him on the totem of USC QB greats? |
I'd rank him second behind Leinart just because Leinart was able to win 2 national championships, a Heisman Trophy, and won a lot of big games in the clutch. Barkley's numbers will be better but it's obvious that he's not as good as Leinart was when he was at SC because he chokes when we need him most. |
I love how we lose to Stanford and you just turn on Barkley.
It's a bit of a stretch to say he "chokes" when we need him the most. He had a bad game against Stanford, and had absolutely no help from the rest of his offense, especially the OL. It sucks, but it happens. |
That's a stretch to say he's getting no help from the rest of the offense. Maybe outside of Lee/Woods but to say the entire offense is false. The OL is pretty bad. I didn't see the game last night but Barkley is making a lot of mistakes it seems, back to back 2 INT games.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kitsnow
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1390
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| If Barkley continues to play this way, he can count the millions the unfinished business will cost him win or lose the conference. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thelawoffices
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 14050
Location: Depths of Gillette Mountain
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| coltsmanic808 wrote: | | That's a stretch to say he's getting no help from the rest of the offense. Maybe outside of Lee/Woods but to say the entire offense is false. The OL is pretty bad. I didn't see the game last night but Barkley is making a lot of mistakes it seems, back to back 2 INT games. |
I was just talking about the Stanford game in particular, not overall. Obviously the rest of the offense is helping out, especially the rushing attack yesterday, but he really had nothing to work with in the Stanford game.
_________________
| mission27 wrote: | | And she flips out like wtf I don't like that and I'm like you don't like rodents? |
#JDI |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
coltsmanic808
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 4139
Location: []_[]
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| thelawoffices wrote: | | coltsmanic808 wrote: | | That's a stretch to say he's getting no help from the rest of the offense. Maybe outside of Lee/Woods but to say the entire offense is false. The OL is pretty bad. I didn't see the game last night but Barkley is making a lot of mistakes it seems, back to back 2 INT games. |
I was just talking about the Stanford game in particular, not overall. Obviously the rest of the offense is helping out, especially the rushing attack yesterday, but he really had nothing to work with in the Stanford game. |
That, I can agree with. I hope Barkley catches fire like how he did last year. We need him to play at a high level to continue directing our offense.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thelawoffices
Joined: 08 Dec 2007
Posts: 14050
Location: Depths of Gillette Mountain
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
