| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
holyghost
Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 5328
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:08 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I am not in favor of Pryor replacing Palmer any time soon, not at all.
But I think it is dumb not to activate him and have him see a package every game. He has some unique skills that could be used. Anything to score some more points, give a spark, challenge an opposing defense. Anything to help win. He is no kind of passer, but he's not without some talents..
Is our 45th man so important that it can't be Pryor? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darkness
Joined: 24 Jun 2012
Posts: 4357
Location: CA-TX
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| holyghost wrote: | I am not in favor of Pryor replacing Palmer any time soon, not at all.
But I think it is dumb not to activate him and have him see a package every game. He has some unique skills that could be used. Anything to score some more points, give a spark, challenge an opposing defense. Anything to help win. He is no kind of passer, but he's not without some talents..
Is our 45th man so important that it can't be Pryor? |
+1 I completely agree.
_________________
El ramster made the sig!
| candyman93 wrote: | Reading Darkness posts you'd think the warriors were playoff contenders  |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JTagg7754
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 7400
Location: Somewhere in Ohio
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| silver_surfer wrote: | | big_palooka wrote: | | silver_surfer wrote: | this team sucks... We have no hope in the short term.. It's time to throw Pryor out there. You act like being a NFL QB is like becoming head of the Senate.... Pryor is just a football player...It's time to bring some life back to the team...
PRYOR, PRYOR, PRYOR, PRYO R |
Please shut up. Like seriously. Shut up.
Oakland is in bad enough shape without putting a QB who isn't a sound passer under center. Some gimmick plays, sure. Starting QB. There is a reason he is #3 on the list. |
I won't SHUT UP! I SHOULDN'T SHUT UP BECAUSE YOU HAVE A DIFFERENT OPINION THEN ME... He's number 3 because he is raw, but he might have the most to offer this team. Only one way for a player to get experience. Pryor is closer to Cam Newton then Tim Tebow. He isn't a lame duck out there... All he does is move the chains |
LOL. Just shut up already.
_________________
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Quote: |
you wouldnt want Rodgers Brady or Manning in his prime as your QBs? |
not with the way the nfl is right now. id take a guy like kaep over them |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ZoomWaffle
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 4604
Location: AZ
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Darkness wrote: | | holyghost wrote: | I am not in favor of Pryor replacing Palmer any time soon, not at all.
But I think it is dumb not to activate him and have him see a package every game. He has some unique skills that could be used. Anything to score some more points, give a spark, challenge an opposing defense. Anything to help win. He is no kind of passer, but he's not without some talents..
Is our 45th man so important that it can't be Pryor? |
+1 I completely agree. |
Same here. The Wildcat can be effective when used sparingly, and he has the perfect skill set for that type of play. It doesnt need to be Wildcat specifically, but there has got to be some way to get him on the field once in a while. Pryor, McFadden and Reece in the same package inside the 10 could be a good thing- 3 potential runners, two potential passers (not sure whos a better thrower- McFadden or Pryor ), and lots of speed.
_________________
Silver&Black88 on the sig
| La_Vader wrote: | | I wouldn't trade Pryor for any prospect in this years draft. Quote me on that |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chali21
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 1718
Location: Cali
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ZoomWaffle wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | holyghost wrote: | I am not in favor of Pryor replacing Palmer any time soon, not at all.
But I think it is dumb not to activate him and have him see a package every game. He has some unique skills that could be used. Anything to score some more points, give a spark, challenge an opposing defense. Anything to help win. He is no kind of passer, but he's not without some talents..
Is our 45th man so important that it can't be Pryor? |
+1 I completely agree. |
Same here. The Wildcat can be effective when used sparingly, and he has the perfect skill set for that type of play. It doesnt need to be Wildcat specifically, but there has got to be some way to get him on the field once in a while. Pryor, McFadden and Reece in the same package inside the 10 could be a good thing- 3 potential runners, two potential passers (not sure whos a better thrower- McFadden or Pryor ), and lots of speed. |
I'm surprised we haven't seen DMC make one pass yet. He did it all the time at Arkanas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12643
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Chali21 wrote: | | ZoomWaffle wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | holyghost wrote: | I am not in favor of Pryor replacing Palmer any time soon, not at all.
But I think it is dumb not to activate him and have him see a package every game. He has some unique skills that could be used. Anything to score some more points, give a spark, challenge an opposing defense. Anything to help win. He is no kind of passer, but he's not without some talents..
Is our 45th man so important that it can't be Pryor? |
+1 I completely agree. |
Same here. The Wildcat can be effective when used sparingly, and he has the perfect skill set for that type of play. It doesnt need to be Wildcat specifically, but there has got to be some way to get him on the field once in a while. Pryor, McFadden and Reece in the same package inside the 10 could be a good thing- 3 potential runners, two potential passers (not sure whos a better thrower- McFadden or Pryor ), and lots of speed. |
I'm surprised we haven't seen DMC make one pass yet. He did it all the time at Arkanas. |
iirc everytime we tried wildcat with bush or dmac it failed.
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chali21
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 1718
Location: Cali
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Chali21 wrote: | | ZoomWaffle wrote: | | Darkness wrote: | | holyghost wrote: | I am not in favor of Pryor replacing Palmer any time soon, not at all.
But I think it is dumb not to activate him and have him see a package every game. He has some unique skills that could be used. Anything to score some more points, give a spark, challenge an opposing defense. Anything to help win. He is no kind of passer, but he's not without some talents..
Is our 45th man so important that it can't be Pryor? |
+1 I completely agree. |
Same here. The Wildcat can be effective when used sparingly, and he has the perfect skill set for that type of play. It doesnt need to be Wildcat specifically, but there has got to be some way to get him on the field once in a while. Pryor, McFadden and Reece in the same package inside the 10 could be a good thing- 3 potential runners, two potential passers (not sure whos a better thrower- McFadden or Pryor ), and lots of speed. |
I'm surprised we haven't seen DMC make one pass yet. He did it all the time at Arkanas. |
iirc everytime we tried wildcat with bush or dmac it failed. |
or even use him like how the chargers used LT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baggabonez
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 3861
Location: RaiderNation
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| holyghost wrote: | I am not in favor of Pryor replacing Palmer any time soon, not at all.
But I think it is dumb not to activate him and have him see a package every game. He has some unique skills that could be used. Anything to score some more points, give a spark, challenge an opposing defense. Anything to help win. He is no kind of passer, but he's not without some talents..
Is our 45th man so important that it can't be Pryor? |
Just playing devil's advocate, but how can the staff justify learning something new when they don't have the basic package down?
That being said I agree with you.
_________________
2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jfitz812
Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 750
Location: Indiana
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| silver_surfer wrote: | | big_palooka wrote: | | silver_surfer wrote: | this team sucks... We have no hope in the short term.. It's time to throw Pryor out there. You act like being a NFL QB is like becoming head of the Senate.... Pryor is just a football player...It's time to bring some life back to the team...
PRYOR, PRYOR, PRYOR, PRYO R |
Please shut up. Like seriously. Shut up.
Oakland is in bad enough shape without putting a QB who isn't a sound passer under center. Some gimmick plays, sure. Starting QB. There is a reason he is #3 on the list. |
I won't SHUT UP! I SHOULDN'T SHUT UP BECAUSE YOU HAVE A DIFFERENT OPINION THEN ME... He's number 3 because he is raw, but he might have the most to offer this team. Only one way for a player to get experience. Pryor is closer to Cam Newton then Tim Tebow. He isn't a lame duck out there... All he does is move the chains |
Hahahaha
He said Tim Tebow....
Used him as an argument to start Pryor even....
Love it.
_________________
Props to cDubs14 on the sig.
Adopt-a-Raider 2012: Carson Palmer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Django
Joined: 03 May 2012
Posts: 1497
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dcreek
Joined: 09 Nov 2010
Posts: 202
Location: Parts Unknown
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| If Raiders are like 2-8, yeah... Put in Pryor. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baggabonez
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 3861
Location: RaiderNation
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Didn't Pryor throw a couple picks in there? How are you going to make sales like that? or were those the best ones?
_________________
2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dreadymatt
Joined: 05 Feb 2010
Posts: 763
Location: Saturn
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| He should definitely be activated, remember how fleet footed he looked against Detroit in preseason - personally I'd put in at no 2 over ML |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Raidin
Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 4316
Location: Dublin
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Jesus, he looks terrible.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
holyghost
Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 5328
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Raidin wrote: |
Jesus, he looks terrible. |
I honestly saw a marked difference between his accuracy when either he was on the move or the target was on the move, as opposed to when he had to sit as if in a pocket. His worst series was when he was throwing over the dummies, standing still. Which means he is not throwing instinctually in that circumstance, but rather trying to hit a spot from a pocket stance.
Peyton Manning has his stutter step style which he uses as a mechanical device to set his feet properly throw after throw after throw. Pryor, if watched in the preseason, has very lazy feet in the pocket. He needs to enable some sort of habit that keeps his feet moving and serves as a reminder to his mechanics to set his feet and be the trigger to a repetitive and proper throwing motion. With his feet moving, he displays a measure of natural accuracy.
If he can engage his feet in the pocket the way that he naturally does when he is on the move, he can be far more accurate overall. Because he is accurate when on the move, as seen in this video and the handful of good throws from the preseason. The best of them were thrown on the move, ala the 2nd Criner TD.
If I can figure this out from 1 preseason game and a 3 minute training video, his goddamn QB coach better figure it out and get something done about it. It better have already been figured out months ago. If he is shaped properly, he has both athleticism and potential. If he is neglected, he'll never be an NFL passer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
