| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Who wins the trade? |
| Team 1 |
|
100% |
[ 2 ] |
| Team 2 |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 2 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Dgould117
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 715
Location: Naples, FL
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:06 pm Post subject: Trade |
 |
|
|
Who wins trade?
Team 1:
Brandon Marshall
Michael Vick
Darren McFadden
Dennis Pitta
For
Team 2:
Tom Brady
Jimmy Graham
Secondly, what is your opinion on veto etiquette? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
deuces22wild
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 5687
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 2:52 pm Post subject: Re: Trade |
|
|
|
| Dgould117 wrote: | Who wins trade?
Team 1:
Brandon Marshall
Michael Vick
Darren McFadden
Dennis Pitta
For
Team 2:
Tom Brady
Jimmy Graham
Secondly, what is your opinion on veto etiquette? |
Though its a 4-2 trade I would call this one a wash.
Graham and Marshall basically cancel each other out stat wise.
Brady for Vick/MDC is good value but both guys aren't playing as good as they should be and both guys have serious injury concerns.
Does the team getting 4 guys need all of those guys to start?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dgould117
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 715
Location: Naples, FL
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 3:26 pm Post subject: Re: Trade |
|
|
|
| deuces22wild wrote: | | Dgould117 wrote: | Who wins trade?
Team 1:
Brandon Marshall
Michael Vick
Darren McFadden
Dennis Pitta
For
Team 2:
Tom Brady
Jimmy Graham
Secondly, what is your opinion on veto etiquette? |
Though its a 4-2 trade I would call this one a wash.
Graham and Marshall basically cancel each other out stat wise.
Brady for Vick/MDC is good value but both guys aren't playing as good as they should be and both guys have serious injury concerns.
Does the team getting 4 guys need all of those guys to start? |
After the trade, yes. He had no backs wr's really. This trade got vetoed because of what my team ended up looking like....
brady QB
peterson RB
C johnson RB
r bush FX
ridley FX
a brown WR
r wayne WR
graham TE
giants D
gould K
mendenhall B
r williams B
britt B
schaub B
In my opinion, unless collusion is involved, if you veto a trade, you are a Punk. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SwiftTexan
Joined: 15 Feb 2011
Posts: 2424
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Leagues that allow trades to be veto'ed are for amateurs, children and groups of people that will only show up as "Inappropriate/Removed" as soon as I hit submit.
Seriously - if Team 1 likes the trade and team 2 likes the trade - it's done. That's how it works in the NFL and that's how it should work. Was getting Wes Wekler for a 4th a fair trade? No way. Would you give up 4 first round picks for RGIII? Maybe... maybe not.
I've done trades that some people thought were unfair because I knew that one key player could allow me to make another trade that would, in the end, benefit my team. Even if the first trade seemed unfair - it's about the endgame.
My advice - tell your league to get the balls in a row and join a grown-up league next year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73481
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
The problem there is, friends will make trades and split the money when 1 guy clearly is winning the deal and on his way to a title
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
