| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Who will win? |
| Patriots |
|
71% |
[ 20 ] |
| Broncos |
|
28% |
[ 8 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 28 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Tzimisce
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 40627
Location: Slowly coming to terms with the inevitable
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Billy Spikes
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 26287
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tzimisce
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 40627
Location: Slowly coming to terms with the inevitable
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
broncosfan07
Joined: 21 Feb 2007
Posts: 10133
Location: Denver
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:04 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| deters wrote: | | Tzimisce wrote: | | deters wrote: | | broncosfan07 wrote: | | rabbisson wrote: | I think it also bears remembering that Tom Brady is really good against Jack Del Rio coached defenses.
2003: 22-34, 228 yards, 2 TD, win 27-13
2006: 28-39, 249 yards, 1 TD, win 24-21
2009: 23-26, 267 yards, 4 TD, win 35-7
PLAYOFFS
2005: 15-27, 201 yards, 3 TD, win 28-3
2007: 26-28, 262 yards, 3 TD, win 31-20
We'll see if in three years JDR has made some alterations, but Brady does seem to have his number to an extent. |
While Brady has owned JDR, JDR never had a pass rusher even half as good as Miller much less Miller and Dumervil. Reggie Hayward wasn't bad he just isn't the the same league as those two. |
You do realize Del Rio coached Julius Peppers, Ray Lewis and Adalius Thomas, right? |
Brady never faced the Ravens while JDR was on their staff. |
i know. i was refuting his comment saying del rio has never had a pass rusher half as good as miller. |
Yeah I realize that and that's of no relevance since JDR never faced Brady while coaching any of those players. If he had then it'd be easier to figure out how JDR might plan on attacking Brady.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BostonZombie
Joined: 08 Mar 2010
Posts: 1216
Location: 860
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
How did Edelman even hurt his hand? He scored and then left the game?
_________________
AAP: Kyle Love Machine - Tackles - 5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Billy Spikes
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 26287
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ChazStandard
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 2118
Location: The bandwagon, hop on up!
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Gregory out - So does this mean young Wilson gets his first start?
_________________
| ConnPatFan wrote: | | We always assumed BB was playing chess...In fact he is playing Monopoly, and can now put up hotels on Rutgers Secondary. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Billy Spikes
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 26287
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ChazStandard wrote: | | Gregory out - So does this mean young Wilson gets his first start? |
If it's Ebner were doomed. Actully were pretty thin at Safety now, one injury to Chung/Wilson and were in a problem.
Also since Wilson saw so much time at the big nickel package, if he starts at one of the safety spots we already lost a big part of our defense by not having him at that position.
_________________
All Time Top Ten Safeties Ranking
Jennifer Lawrence Tribute Thread
Ray Lewis Tribute Video |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TomRalph
Joined: 03 Apr 2009
Posts: 5816
Location: Leeds, England
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Could we see some of Dowling at CB with McCourty moving to FS?
_________________
| Jmacz008 (With the 32nd Pick of the 2014 NFL Draft) wrote: | | ...the New England Rutgers select, Rutgers Rutgers, Rutgers from Rutgers |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ChazStandard
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 2118
Location: The bandwagon, hop on up!
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Billy Spikes wrote: | | ChazStandard wrote: | | Gregory out - So does this mean young Wilson gets his first start? |
If it's Ebner were doomed. Actully were pretty thin at Safety now, one injury to Chung/Wilson and were in a problem.
Also since Wilson saw so much time at the big nickel package, if he starts at one of the safety spots we already lost a big part of our defense by not having him at that position. |
You forgot, we have Slater 
| TomRalph wrote: | | Could we see some Dowling at CB with McCourty at FS? |
I'd imagine that it would be the other way round. Dowling is bigger and McCourty has been playing well at corner for the most part.
_________________
| ConnPatFan wrote: | | We always assumed BB was playing chess...In fact he is playing Monopoly, and can now put up hotels on Rutgers Secondary. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TomRalph
Joined: 03 Apr 2009
Posts: 5816
Location: Leeds, England
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ChazStandard wrote: | | Billy Spikes wrote: | | ChazStandard wrote: | | Gregory out - So does this mean young Wilson gets his first start? |
If it's Ebner were doomed. Actully were pretty thin at Safety now, one injury to Chung/Wilson and were in a problem.
Also since Wilson saw so much time at the big nickel package, if he starts at one of the safety spots we already lost a big part of our defense by not having him at that position. |
You forgot, we have Slater
| TomRalph wrote: | | Could we see some Dowling at CB with McCourty at FS? |
I'd imagine that it would be the other way round. Dowling is bigger and McCourty has been playing well at corner for the most part. |
Thats what I would expect too, but last year McCourty moved to FS and we played Edelman at CB.
I'm sure BB has something worked out. It may be unorthodox, but we trust him right?
_________________
| Jmacz008 (With the 32nd Pick of the 2014 NFL Draft) wrote: | | ...the New England Rutgers select, Rutgers Rutgers, Rutgers from Rutgers |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cutler06
Joined: 27 Aug 2006
Posts: 9578
Location: Westminster
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TomRalph wrote: | | ChazStandard wrote: | | Billy Spikes wrote: | | ChazStandard wrote: | | Gregory out - So does this mean young Wilson gets his first start? |
If it's Ebner were doomed. Actully were pretty thin at Safety now, one injury to Chung/Wilson and were in a problem.
Also since Wilson saw so much time at the big nickel package, if he starts at one of the safety spots we already lost a big part of our defense by not having him at that position. |
You forgot, we have Slater
| TomRalph wrote: | | Could we see some Dowling at CB with McCourty at FS? |
I'd imagine that it would be the other way round. Dowling is bigger and McCourty has been playing well at corner for the most part. |
Thats what I would expect too, but last year McCourty moved to FS and we played Edelman at CB.
I'm sure BB has something worked out. It may be unorthodox, but we trust him right? |
Looking good for Manning, at least one weakness to exploit.
_________________
| big_palooka wrote: | | 1. The AFC West goes right through Denver. Respect to the Broncos.2. First Denver is a pretender. They are not making the playoffs, just like the Raiders. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
patsfan25
Joined: 07 Dec 2008
Posts: 2862
Location: CenCal
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Like always, I think it's gonna be neck and neck, and the Patriots pull a lead within the last minutes. Peyton tries to lead another comeback drive but comes up short. Another great game between the best QB-to-QB rivalry the NFL has ever seen.
27-21, Patriots
_________________
| Ring Worm Sherm wrote: | | You're an complete idiot |
Aite,
Peace. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tzimisce
Joined: 13 Oct 2005
Posts: 40627
Location: Slowly coming to terms with the inevitable
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If there's one defensive matchup that really worries me it's Dreessen v. Pats' safeties.
The last time the Pats faced Dreessen [week 17 of 2009] he caught 6 for 81 yards and a TD against them.
_________________
https://twitter.com/Zealotry_Metal |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Billy Spikes
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 26287
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
