| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Who SHOULD win the A.L. Cy Young |
| Felix Hernandez |
|
6% |
[ 3 ] |
| David Price |
|
16% |
[ 7 ] |
| Fernando Rodney |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
| Justin Verlander |
|
69% |
[ 30 ] |
| Jered Weaver |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
| Chris Sale |
|
2% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 43 |
|
| Author |
Message |
I <3 Faulk
Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 1597
Location: straight out of Compton.
|
 Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:06 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| green24 wrote: | | I <3 Faulk wrote: | | green24 wrote: | | RuskieTitan wrote: | I think David Price should win, because he has more wins and his stats match up better than Weaver.
Verlander has had a good season but he needs to win more. |
Ruskie, please don't use wins for a pitcher as a credible stat. It is entirely too dependent and is outdated. There are much better stats to use that better show how well a pitcher has performed in a given period of time. |
To be fair, Tiger fans used wins to argue that he should be the MVP last year. I came in here to say he didn't have enough wins to get the CY. It would've been a joke, but makes sense.  |
I'm not a Tigers fan, but I'm against wins being used as a credible stat. |
I don't think you understand what I was saying.
I was saying that, tiger fans thought he should be MVP because he had a bunch of wins. So now this year, that he doesn't have the wins, there should be a different pitcher to win the CY right?
I know you're not a tiger fan. I also don't think wins are a great stat to use. As I stated, it would've been a joke.
_________________
| adam9 wrote: |
One of the best posts I've ever read... |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
detfan782004
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 39210
Location: Montana
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I <3 Faulk wrote: | | green24 wrote: | | I <3 Faulk wrote: | | green24 wrote: | | RuskieTitan wrote: | I think David Price should win, because he has more wins and his stats match up better than Weaver.
Verlander has had a good season but he needs to win more. |
Ruskie, please don't use wins for a pitcher as a credible stat. It is entirely too dependent and is outdated. There are much better stats to use that better show how well a pitcher has performed in a given period of time. |
To be fair, Tiger fans used wins to argue that he should be the MVP last year. I came in here to say he didn't have enough wins to get the CY. It would've been a joke, but makes sense. |
I'm not a Tigers fan, but I'm against wins being used as a credible stat. |
I don't think you understand what I was saying.
I was saying that, tiger fans thought he should be MVP because he had a bunch of wins. So now this year, that he doesn't have the wins, there should be a different pitcher to win the CY right?
I know you're not a tiger fan. I also don't think wins are a great stat to use. As I stated, it would've been a joke. |
Wins wasnt a real big argument for. His all around numbers were dominant last year. Wins were icing on the cake
_________________
FFMD II AGM- DETROIT LIONS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
