Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

GDT: @ Houston Texans (Option to leave Finley in Texas)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 61, 62, 63  Next
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Are we overreacting?
Yes
24%
 24%  [ 17 ]
No
42%
 42%  [ 30 ]
justo is an idiot
32%
 32%  [ 23 ]
Total Votes : 70

Author Message
smetana34


Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 3116
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Green Bay +10
_________________
Uncle Buck wrote:

Uncle Buck: "I'm expecting Kate Beckinsale to dump her husband and run away with me."


incognito_man wrote:

you probably have better odds of running off with Tebow.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JBURGE25


Joined: 25 Jan 2012
Posts: 12259
Location: Canadia
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

lumberjackchris wrote:
CWood21 wrote:
This could get real ugly, real fast. Right now, Houston is just playing way too well.


We're really not, we've played mediocre teams other than Denver. The right side of our line is in major flux, which im sure Mathews will take full advantage of.

We really haven't ran the ball all to well, Arians only putting up numbers because he's getting a ton of carries.

We play 3 CB's and 3 S's in dime and our 3rd safety Demps broke his forearm last week so now we have a question mark their. So y'all should be able to exploit out secondary outside of JJoe.


Except that the Colts terrible secondary was missing 2 starters this game, AND WE STILL LOST
_________________

XBL: ShiiNyIV
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LftCoastPackFan


Joined: 30 Apr 2010
Posts: 743
Location: Los Angeles
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chucknorris101 wrote:
For all the crap people give finley about drops and sucking. If you want one point in the ballgame that totally turned the game around today it was when he went out. If we had jennings we probably would have been ok, but without we had no one to key coverage on and made rodgers' job so much harder.

If you notice the downhill...er falling off a cliff of the offense occurred immediately after his injury.
Finley going out turned the game around? d'oh! BTW, he had another drop on the short hitch route, guy sucks so bad and is trash. I don't care if he draws defenders, keeps on dropping balls and his legs are shot; always goes down on first contact; DJ WILLIAMS PLEASE!!!

The game changed on the Perry hit and fumble that we didn't get. The NFL is almost becoming unwatchable, did you see Luck laughing after the call? Evil or Very Mad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pugger


Joined: 01 May 2010
Posts: 7957
Location: Titletown for the summer!
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LftCoastPackFan wrote:
chucknorris101 wrote:
For all the crap people give finley about drops and sucking. If you want one point in the ballgame that totally turned the game around today it was when he went out. If we had jennings we probably would have been ok, but without we had no one to key coverage on and made rodgers' job so much harder.

If you notice the downhill...er falling off a cliff of the offense occurred immediately after his injury.
Finley going out turned the game around? d'oh! BTW, he had another drop on the short hitch route, guy sucks so bad and is trash. I don't care if he draws defenders, keeps on dropping balls and his legs are shot; always goes down on first contact; DJ WILLIAMS PLEASE!!!

The game changed on the Perry hit and fumble that we didn't get. The NFL is almost becoming unwatchable, did you see Luck laughing after the call? Evil or Very Mad


After Finley went down Williams didn't do much either.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Title Town USA


Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 19308
Location: Wisconsin
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Over/under JJ Watt sacks?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MNPackfan32


Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 7830
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Title Town USA wrote:
Over/under JJ Watt sacks?
6 and I'll take the over.
_________________



Duff Man wrote:
MNPackfan32 wrote:
Josh Sitton, Mike Daniels

Average at best
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
56GiantPens66


Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Posts: 603
Location: A parallel universe called New Pittsburgh
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ArodFanboy wrote:
Texans 35
Packers 14


This looks about right.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lumberjackchris


Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 4531
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Title Town USA wrote:
lumberjackchris wrote:
CWood21 wrote:
This could get real ugly, real fast. Right now, Houston is just playing way too well.


We're really not, we've played mediocre teams other than Denver. The right side of our line is in major flux, which im sure Mathews will take full advantage of.

We really haven't ran the ball all to well, Arians only putting up numbers because he's getting a ton of carries.

We play 3 CB's and 3 S's in dime and our 3rd safety Demps broke his forearm last week so now we have a question mark their. So y'all should be able to exploit out secondary outside of JJoe.


That's a great avatar.


Appreciate it man.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MNPackfan32


Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 7830
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well folks, I hate to say it but this is the season right here. We win we set the tone for the rest of the year. We lay an egg, and we are looking at a top 15 pick. That was a game we needed and we really showed no fire when the Colts were on a roll.
_________________



Duff Man wrote:
MNPackfan32 wrote:
Josh Sitton, Mike Daniels

Average at best
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
incognito_man


Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 30496
Location: Madison
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

smetana34 wrote:
Green Bay +10


+10 Shocked

yeah, i'm all over that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
umphrey


Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 1238
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

O/U Andre Johnson recieving yards?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
justo


Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 12951
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

incognito_man wrote:
smetana34 wrote:
Green Bay +10


+10 Shocked

yeah, i'm all over that.


That's the line? So Packers projected to lose by 10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
lumberjackchris


Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 4531
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

umphrey wrote:
O/U Andre Johnson recieving yards?


That's really tough, we havnt shown much these first couple of games, because we havnt needed to. We aired it out against Denver and had to long td passes to Walter and Dre respectively.

Im sure Kubiak has been saving it for this game along with the Ravens and Pats game. I'd go O/u 110.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
I Am Rodgers


Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 7125
Location: New Jersey
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

justo wrote:
incognito_man wrote:
smetana34 wrote:
Green Bay +10


+10 Shocked

yeah, i'm all over that.


That's the line? So Packers projected to lose by 10


What? Confused My site has Texans -5.5. Tonights Texans game is Texans -9. Maybe you got the games mixed up. I'll still take the Packers +5.5. This is going to be one of two games. Either we have no shot at all and it shows all game long OR McCarthy calls a gem and inspires a great win. We won't lose this one in close fashion. Either we win or we lose and look like we don't belong on the same field.
_________________


stallyns wrote:
Good thing for talky-talk Harbaugh he has an outstanding citizen/player like Aldon Smith on his team and not a classless hooligan like Clay Matthews.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
umphrey


Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 1238
PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

lumberjackchris wrote:
umphrey wrote:
O/U Andre Johnson recieving yards?


That's really tough, we havnt shown much these first couple of games, because we havnt needed to. We aired it out against Denver and had to long td passes to Walter and Dre respectively.

Im sure Kubiak has been saving it for this game along with the Ravens and Pats game. I'd go O/u 110.


I thought WR1s were really going off against us, but it turns out it's just been Wayne and Colston. Still, not feeling good about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 61, 62, 63  Next
Page 5 of 63

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group