| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Are we overreacting? |
| Yes |
|
24% |
[ 17 ] |
| No |
|
42% |
[ 30 ] |
| justo is an idiot |
|
32% |
[ 23 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 70 |
|
| Author |
Message |
smetana34
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 2756
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:37 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Green Bay +10 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JBURGE25
Joined: 25 Jan 2012
Posts: 5846
Location: Canadia
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| lumberjackchris wrote: | | CWood21 wrote: | | This could get real ugly, real fast. Right now, Houston is just playing way too well. |
We're really not, we've played mediocre teams other than Denver. The right side of our line is in major flux, which im sure Mathews will take full advantage of.
We really haven't ran the ball all to well, Arians only putting up numbers because he's getting a ton of carries.
We play 3 CB's and 3 S's in dime and our 3rd safety Demps broke his forearm last week so now we have a question mark their. So y'all should be able to exploit out secondary outside of JJoe. |
Except that the Colts terrible secondary was missing 2 starters this game, AND WE STILL LOST
_________________
Kempes on the sig
XBL ShiiNy IV |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LftCoastPackFan
Joined: 30 Apr 2010
Posts: 552
Location: Los Angeles
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| chucknorris101 wrote: | For all the crap people give finley about drops and sucking. If you want one point in the ballgame that totally turned the game around today it was when he went out. If we had jennings we probably would have been ok, but without we had no one to key coverage on and made rodgers' job so much harder.
If you notice the downhill...er falling off a cliff of the offense occurred immediately after his injury. |
Finley going out turned the game around?  BTW, he had another drop on the short hitch route, guy sucks so bad and is trash. I don't care if he draws defenders, keeps on dropping balls and his legs are shot; always goes down on first contact; DJ WILLIAMS PLEASE!!!
The game changed on the Perry hit and fumble that we didn't get. The NFL is almost becoming unwatchable, did you see Luck laughing after the call?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pugger
Joined: 01 May 2010
Posts: 4324
Location: N. Fort Myers, FL
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| LftCoastPackFan wrote: | | chucknorris101 wrote: | For all the crap people give finley about drops and sucking. If you want one point in the ballgame that totally turned the game around today it was when he went out. If we had jennings we probably would have been ok, but without we had no one to key coverage on and made rodgers' job so much harder.
If you notice the downhill...er falling off a cliff of the offense occurred immediately after his injury. |
Finley going out turned the game around? BTW, he had another drop on the short hitch route, guy sucks so bad and is trash. I don't care if he draws defenders, keeps on dropping balls and his legs are shot; always goes down on first contact; DJ WILLIAMS PLEASE!!!
The game changed on the Perry hit and fumble that we didn't get. The NFL is almost becoming unwatchable, did you see Luck laughing after the call? |
After Finley went down Williams didn't do much either.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Title Town USA
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 15338
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Over/under JJ Watt sacks?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 5540
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Title Town USA wrote: | | Over/under JJ Watt sacks? |
6 and I'll take the over. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
56GiantPens66
Joined: 23 Sep 2009
Posts: 562
Location: A parallel universe called New Pittsburgh
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ArodFanboy wrote: | Texans 35
Packers 14 |
This looks about right.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumberjackchris
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 3120
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Title Town USA wrote: | | lumberjackchris wrote: | | CWood21 wrote: | | This could get real ugly, real fast. Right now, Houston is just playing way too well. |
We're really not, we've played mediocre teams other than Denver. The right side of our line is in major flux, which im sure Mathews will take full advantage of.
We really haven't ran the ball all to well, Arians only putting up numbers because he's getting a ton of carries.
We play 3 CB's and 3 S's in dime and our 3rd safety Demps broke his forearm last week so now we have a question mark their. So y'all should be able to exploit out secondary outside of JJoe. |
That's a great avatar. |
Appreciate it man.
_________________
^Kempes on the sick sig^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 5540
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Well folks, I hate to say it but this is the season right here. We win we set the tone for the rest of the year. We lay an egg, and we are looking at a top 15 pick. That was a game we needed and we really showed no fire when the Colts were on a roll. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
incognito_man
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 26371
Location: Madison
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| smetana34 wrote: | | Green Bay +10 |
+10 
yeah, i'm all over that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
umphrey
Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 1015
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| O/U Andre Johnson recieving yards? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
justo
Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Posts: 9058
Location: Hood River, Oregon
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| incognito_man wrote: | | smetana34 wrote: | | Green Bay +10 |
+10
yeah, i'm all over that. |
That's the line? So Packers projected to lose by 10
_________________
 | HyponGrey wrote: | | Facing the reality that your team has higher standards than you do? Priceless. |
@JustoFS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumberjackchris
Joined: 14 Apr 2011
Posts: 3120
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| umphrey wrote: | | O/U Andre Johnson recieving yards? |
That's really tough, we havnt shown much these first couple of games, because we havnt needed to. We aired it out against Denver and had to long td passes to Walter and Dre respectively.
Im sure Kubiak has been saving it for this game along with the Ravens and Pats game. I'd go O/u 110.
_________________
^Kempes on the sick sig^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I Am Rodgers
Joined: 19 Jan 2009
Posts: 6400
Location: New Jersey
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| justo wrote: | | incognito_man wrote: | | smetana34 wrote: | | Green Bay +10 |
+10
yeah, i'm all over that. |
That's the line? So Packers projected to lose by 10 |
What?  My site has Texans -5.5. Tonights Texans game is Texans -9. Maybe you got the games mixed up. I'll still take the Packers +5.5. This is going to be one of two games. Either we have no shot at all and it shows all game long OR McCarthy calls a gem and inspires a great win. We won't lose this one in close fashion. Either we win or we lose and look like we don't belong on the same field.
_________________
| ChaRisMa wrote: | | I thought I was the only one adding three inches. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
umphrey
Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 1015
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| lumberjackchris wrote: | | umphrey wrote: | | O/U Andre Johnson recieving yards? |
That's really tough, we havnt shown much these first couple of games, because we havnt needed to. We aired it out against Denver and had to long td passes to Walter and Dre respectively.
Im sure Kubiak has been saving it for this game along with the Ravens and Pats game. I'd go O/u 110. |
I thought WR1s were really going off against us, but it turns out it's just been Wayne and Colston. Still, not feeling good about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
