| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
#1CARDSFAN
Joined: 18 Jan 2006
Posts: 23284
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:35 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| stchamp98 wrote: | | #1CARDSFAN wrote: | | I don't agree that taking players such as Michael Floyd was a bad pick. We won't know that for 3 years possibly less. Even Ryan Williams although everyone hated the pick at the time wasn't really a terrible pick. |
Who said taking Floyd was a bad pick? I wouldn't agree with that either.
I also don't agree with Bickley's assessment of Roberts as a "rising star" pre-2012 draft. It's painfully obvious Mr. Bickley is thinking in the now with that statement and completely ignoring Roberts horribly mediocre 2011 play. |
The way I read ther article made me think that's what he was saying. It said they took Michael Floyd with the 13th pick although Andre Roberts is a rising star.It says it's like a gambler chasing lost money,that they keep paying for the same mistake?
Ummm. I am not so sure about this. They have a big board and have stuck to it. If that was an OL then they would have taken one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stchamp98
Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 52947
Location: Havre, Montana
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| #1CARDSFAN wrote: | | stchamp98 wrote: | | #1CARDSFAN wrote: | | I don't agree that taking players such as Michael Floyd was a bad pick. We won't know that for 3 years possibly less. Even Ryan Williams although everyone hated the pick at the time wasn't really a terrible pick. |
Who said taking Floyd was a bad pick? I wouldn't agree with that either.
I also don't agree with Bickley's assessment of Roberts as a "rising star" pre-2012 draft. It's painfully obvious Mr. Bickley is thinking in the now with that statement and completely ignoring Roberts horribly mediocre 2011 play. |
The way I read ther article made me think that's what he was saying. It said they took Michael Floyd with the 13th pick although Andre Roberts is a rising star.It says it's like a gambler chasing lost money,that they keep paying for the same mistake?
Ummm. I am not so sure about this. They have a big board and have stuck to it. If that was an OL then they would have taken one. |
You're right, that it what it says now i think about it.
I don't agree with Bickley at all. Not a shocker, the guy's an idiot.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
younggun1273
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Posts: 6887
Location: Tallahassee
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Floyd looked like a good pick at the time and it was hard to argue against it. He was arguably the top receiver in the draft and I still don't think it was a bad pick. What gets lost in all of this is that Roberts and Doucet are good receivers. They are not great and are not be #1s but they are undoubtedly good. Whiz makes his rookies work and Floyd has done nothing to unseat Doucet and Roberts. Draft status is not enough to become a starter.
_________________
Justo on the sig
Rock Chalk, Jayhawk! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DirtyDez
Joined: 15 Oct 2010
Posts: 9653
Location: the Arizona desert
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Would have signing Carl Nicks made it impossible to extend D-Wash & CC?
_________________
The Rebuild Has Begun... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DJ_Fka
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 3289
Location: Brisvegas, Land Down Under
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DirtyDez wrote: | | Would have signing Carl Nicks made it impossible to extend D-Wash & CC? |
Indeed it would have |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stchamp98
Joined: 11 Apr 2005
Posts: 52947
Location: Havre, Montana
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| DJ_Fka wrote: | | DirtyDez wrote: | | Would have signing Carl Nicks made it impossible to extend D-Wash & CC? |
Indeed it would have |
Yup, pretty much.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
