| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jrry32
Joined: 04 Jan 2011
Posts: 52011
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 6:22 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| bpastermack wrote: | | jrry32 wrote: | | DirtyDez wrote: | | Clutch wrote: | | Try going to the Rams/Cards/Bears/Jets forums and ask them about their current situation and what they would give to have Jake. . |
At least a 1st & 3rd if he re-signs... |
Really? I wouldn't offer anything unless he plans to re-sign and if he does, I wouldn't offer more than a 2nd because I'm assuming the money he'll want is excessive. |
Sounds about right and I wouldn't trade him for less than a 2nd AND 3rd if I am Miami, so it's not going to happen. |
I wasn't saying a 2nd and a 3rd, just a 2nd. Then again, I don't value the LT position anywhere nearly as highly as most people do.
_________________
| KingBishop wrote: | | JammerHammer21 wrote: | | Jarvis looked like a slug on and off the field. |
Off the field? Like when he is grocery shopping, does he block the freezer aisle with his sluggish selection of which hungry man to buy? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fender
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Posts: 904
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| dolphinologist wrote: | | SUG wrote: | For the Love of God somebody convince the Phins to trade Jake Long before other teams figure out
he is not worth trading for a low 2nd rnd pk ....!!!!
sug |
Half of these daffodils that think he's a top 5 LT couldn't name the other 4.
They sit and watch game after game and can't see a difference in his play. |
Both of you are seriously clueless if you believe he isnt worth more than low 2nd... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cddolphin
Joined: 23 Mar 2009
Posts: 7648
Location: Gainesville, FL
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| It's night and day for some people on both sides of the fence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fender
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Posts: 904
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| cddolphin wrote: | | It's night and day for some people on both sides of the fence. |
Through the 1st 3rd of 2012 he is not Anthony Munoz, but to suggest he is Vladimir Ducasse is quite amusing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dolphinologist
Joined: 07 Mar 2007
Posts: 5600
Location: New York
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2012 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Fender wrote: | | dolphinologist wrote: | | SUG wrote: | For the Love of God somebody convince the Phins to trade Jake Long before other teams figure out
he is not worth trading for a low 2nd rnd pk ....!!!!
sug |
Half of these daffodils that think he's a top 5 LT couldn't name the other 4.
They sit and watch game after game and can't see a difference in his play. |
Both of you are seriously clueless if you believe he isnt worth more than low 2nd... |
To the Jets or Bears he's wort their first two picks / pats or packers ... not so much ... @gotclues.info
_________________
Fellow Posters: I beg that you not misunderstand my level of arrogance. My handle is an implication of Dolphin study not necessarily Dolphin expertise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fender
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Posts: 904
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 5:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| dolphinologist wrote: | | Fender wrote: | | dolphinologist wrote: | | SUG wrote: | For the Love of God somebody convince the Phins to trade Jake Long before other teams figure out
he is not worth trading for a low 2nd rnd pk ....!!!!
sug |
Half of these daffodils that think he's a top 5 LT couldn't name the other 4.
They sit and watch game after game and can't see a difference in his play. |
Both of you are seriously clueless if you believe he isnt worth more than low 2nd... |
To the Jets or Bears he's wort their first two picks / pats or packers ... not so much ... @gotclues.info |
See thats the thing about the free agency market - the Dolphins' trade partners for Jake Long arent limited to the teams that have no need for Jake Long....  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bpastermack
Joined: 17 Feb 2009
Posts: 13368
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
These are the only teams that could afford to take on Jake Long's salary in THIS year through a trade without cutting guys to make room for him...
Jaguars: $28.7 million.
Chiefs: $26.6 million.
Eagles: $20.2 million.
Titans: $17.0 million.
Bengals: $15.2 million.
Buccaneers: $14.9 million.
Browns: $13.3 million.
Seahawks: $13.2 million.
You rarely see big name players traded at this point in the year because a lot of teams don't have 15 mil in cap space sitting around and won't want to purge some of their roster for a new player at this point in the season. Especially for a player who is obviously injured, and not playing 100% and will be a free agent in the offseason.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
phinmun
Joined: 29 Dec 2007
Posts: 2231
Location: South Carolina
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bpastermack wrote: |
You rarely see big name players traded at this point in the year because a lot of teams don't have 15 mil in cap space sitting around and won't want to purge some of their roster for a new player at this point in the season. Especially for a player who is obviously injured, and not playing 100% and will be a free agent in the offseason. |
But realistically, we'd get a conditional 3rd if he walked, right? I'm not that worried that no one's willing to give us a late-2nd for him right now. It's not that big a deal and we need his play because to my knowledge, we don't have a reliable backup AND we're trying to stay competitive during this rebuilding. I'm sure Ross supports them but, c'mon, we do need to stay competitive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Deadeye
Joined: 07 Apr 2008
Posts: 6000
Location: A Nearby Dolphin Encounter
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| phinmun wrote: | | bpastermack wrote: |
You rarely see big name players traded at this point in the year because a lot of teams don't have 15 mil in cap space sitting around and won't want to purge some of their roster for a new player at this point in the season. Especially for a player who is obviously injured, and not playing 100% and will be a free agent in the offseason. |
But realistically, we'd get a conditional 3rd if he walked, right? I'm not that worried that no one's willing to give us a late-2nd for him right now. It's not that big a deal and we need his play because to my knowledge, we don't have a reliable backup AND we're trying to stay competitive during this rebuilding. I'm sure Ross supports them but, c'mon, we do need to stay competitive. |
I think you mean a compensitory 3rd. All compensitory picks fall after the round they are named for, thus if we got a compensitory 3rd it would come after pick #96 overall. Those are better than nothing, but not that great either.
_________________
Earn more sessions by sleeving. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
