| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Billy Spikes
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 38497
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IDOG_det
Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 20898
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
So is their pass rush gone now?
_________________
| CWood21 wrote: | | This anti-Teddy crap is getting out of hand. |
R.I.P. Stylish |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jfinley88
Joined: 08 Feb 2010
Posts: 9325
Location: U.C.F.
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| IDOG_det wrote: | | So is their pass rush gone now? |
Perry split the job with Walden. They'll be no drop off with the loss of Perry.
_________________
| justo wrote: | | THIS ONE IS FOR LULU |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Posty
Joined: 04 Sep 2010
Posts: 1387
Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jfinley88 wrote: | | IDOG_det wrote: | | So is their pass rush gone now? |
Perry split the job with Walden. They'll be no drop off with the loss of Perry. |
Not to mention Worthy, Neal, and Daniels have all played a part in getting interior pass rush this year. Our defense as a hole is much better at rushing the passer than it was a year ago. We'll be fine without Perry as long as Walden continues to play at the level he has.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNPackfan32
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Posts: 7585
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| IDOG_det wrote: | | So is their pass rush gone now? |
Without Matthews and Perry? Yeah pretty much, nobody else is better than average or ok and that's with both of those other guys in the game. Though I think our offense should be better with Quarless back.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
49ers Finest
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 8289
Location: San Jose
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| jfinley88 wrote: | | IDOG_det wrote: | | So is their pass rush gone now? |
Perry split the job with Walden. They'll be no drop off with the loss of Perry. |
Didn't you say your pass rush was 100x better this year than last because perry disnt allow offenses to put so much attention on clay?
Not sure if walden started last season, I think he did. And you guys were saying that's why clay was having a bad season and a major upgrade was needed?
_________________
***WE RUN THE WEST!***
SB AT HOME!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
new sig... sorry alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ugLymayNe
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 12176
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 49ers Finest wrote: | Didn't you say your pass rush was 100x better this year than last because perry disnt allow offenses to put so much attention on clay?
Not sure if walden started last season, I think he did. And you guys were saying that's why clay was having a bad season and a major upgrade was needed? |
We've been getting good pressure on the QB without Perry for weeks now. Clay's "down" season was more due to the defensive line in front of him and the fact we had no one to push Walden. We did need an upgrade over Walden, he is at best a role player.
_________________
@PJHotel_
Sig brought to you by Justo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ketchup
Joined: 13 May 2009
Posts: 13344
Location: Milwaukee, WI
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ugLymayNe wrote: | | 49ers Finest wrote: | Didn't you say your pass rush was 100x better this year than last because perry disnt allow offenses to put so much attention on clay?
Not sure if walden started last season, I think he did. And you guys were saying that's why clay was having a bad season and a major upgrade was needed? |
We've been getting good pressure on the QB without Perry for weeks now. Clay's "down" season was more due to the defensive line in front of him and the fact we had no one to push Walden. We did need an upgrade over Walden, he is at best a role player. |
Let me just be the one to say that Clay didn't have a down season last year. His sack numbers were down but he posted elite pressure numbers and became even better in the run game while maintaining his great coverage skill. He actually probably had his best season last year.
As for Perry, it sucks we lost him but we was a role player on this team in his young age. He was progressing nicely but was splitting time with Walden before he got hurt. He'll be missed of course because he's a young pass rusher with high potential but it is what it is.
Last year Walden was just not a very good player. This year he's come back and impressed. He took splitting time with Perry and made the most of that situation. Since Perry went down in week 6, Walden has been fairly good. Losing Clay is what hurts. Without Clay, our pass rush falls apart. We have some nice role players to feed off Clay but without the diamond of our defense, things may get ugly.
_________________
Kempes on the custom sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
.flash
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 2923
Location: <- Coast
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Walden has played well but there is no way you can replace Perry's pass rush talent with Walden. With CM3 out for the time being, we don't have a pass rush...
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Green90
Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 652
Location: Virginia
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Agreed, some of the above posts are underrating what Perry brought as a pass rush this season. Walden may not be as lost in coverage as Perry is, but when was the last time we saw him run through an OT like Perry has displayed?
_________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | I also have a bitchin' camero |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ugLymayNe
Joined: 31 Oct 2006
Posts: 12176
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Green90 wrote: | | when was the last time we saw him run through an OT like Perry has displayed? |
He doesn't have to. We've been fine without Perry - last we saw him was vs Houston. Perry could turn into one of the players the Packers can't afford to lose down the road but he has been part of a rotation(Walden did get quite a bit of time, but Moses did get snaps here and there as well). We also activated Zombo the other day, who has played well in spots in the past(IE the Super Bowl).
_________________
@PJHotel_
Sig brought to you by Justo |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Green90
Joined: 23 Jan 2011
Posts: 652
Location: Virginia
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ugLymayNe wrote: | | Green90 wrote: | | when was the last time we saw him run through an OT like Perry has displayed? |
He doesn't have to. We've been fine without Perry - last we saw him was vs Houston. Perry could turn into one of the players the Packers can't afford to lose down the road but he has been part of a rotation(Walden did get quite a bit of time, but Moses did get snaps here and there as well). We also activated Zombo the other day, who has played well in spots in the past(IE the Super Bowl). |
Yes we have been fine without him, but we are still better with him in the lineup. Walden may be better at other parts of his job, but he does not bring the pass rush that Perry does. It is an extreme, and I mean extreme, rarity to see Walden straight up beat his blocker (Guard or Tackle). A very large part of the pressures he has gotten have come from schemed blitzes or overloads.
With Matthews out we take a huge blow to our pass rush. He may or may not be back after the bye week, but I'd be far more comfortable with Perry in the lineup if Clay had to miss some time. Hell, Moses is a better rusher with just his speed and bend than Walden is.
_________________
| Webmaster wrote: | | I also have a bitchin' camero |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JaguarCrazy2832
Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 80562
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
damn he was one of those guys i really wanted in J'ville but hoped would have a great year in GB
_________________
| Victor Cruz Pun wrote: | | BornToFly wrote: | | Yes, I went to high school with Tony Romo |
Did he do good on the homework and quizzes but choke on the tests? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
#JDI
