| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Seahawk719
Joined: 30 Jan 2008
Posts: 143
|
 Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:36 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| patsfan25 wrote: | | Isn't this like the 10th time the Seahawks wanted the NFL to review something this season? I find that ironic considering how they run fake punts on incompetent opponents when up 75-0, and how they question their class moves late in the games. |
lol a patriots fan complaining about teams running up the score. Too funny |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nugpimpen
Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 22400
Location: 10 Miles South of Cleveland
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Seahawk719 wrote: | | patsfan25 wrote: | | Isn't this like the 10th time the Seahawks wanted the NFL to review something this season? I find that ironic considering how they run fake punts on incompetent opponents when up 75-0, and how they question their class moves late in the games. |
lol a patriots fan complaining about teams running up the score. Too funny |
Is he wrong?
No
_________________
| catcheryea wrote: | | Harper41 wrote: | | And why is this turning into the Auburn WR vs OSU WR |
Because the game won't be close, so they have to make something competitive. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SupeRG00F
Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 1584
Location: Vancouver, Wa
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nugpimpen wrote: | | Seahawk719 wrote: | | patsfan25 wrote: | | Isn't this like the 10th time the Seahawks wanted the NFL to review something this season? I find that ironic considering how they run fake punts on incompetent opponents when up 75-0, and how they question their class moves late in the games. |
lol a patriots fan complaining about teams running up the score. Too funny |
Is he wrong?
No |
Is he wrong?
Yes
It was 42-17. not 75-0. If only it was. That'd really get you guys going.
_________________
Xbox Gamertag: SupeR G00F |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nugpimpen
Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 22400
Location: 10 Miles South of Cleveland
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SupeRG00F wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Seahawk719 wrote: | | patsfan25 wrote: | | Isn't this like the 10th time the Seahawks wanted the NFL to review something this season? I find that ironic considering how they run fake punts on incompetent opponents when up 75-0, and how they question their class moves late in the games. |
lol a patriots fan complaining about teams running up the score. Too funny |
Is he wrong?
No |
Is he wrong?
Yes
It was 42-17. not 75-0. If only it was. That'd really get you guys going. |
I'm not talking about the score, i'm talking about the Hawks crying to the league about something. Especially after the farse Packer ending and Sherman getting overturned due to a technicality.
_________________
| catcheryea wrote: | | Harper41 wrote: | | And why is this turning into the Auburn WR vs OSU WR |
Because the game won't be close, so they have to make something competitive. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SupeRG00F
Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 1584
Location: Vancouver, Wa
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nugpimpen wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Seahawk719 wrote: | | patsfan25 wrote: | | Isn't this like the 10th time the Seahawks wanted the NFL to review something this season? I find that ironic considering how they run fake punts on incompetent opponents when up 75-0, and how they question their class moves late in the games. |
lol a patriots fan complaining about teams running up the score. Too funny |
Is he wrong?
No |
Is he wrong?
Yes
It was 42-17. not 75-0. If only it was. That'd really get you guys going. |
I'm not talking about the score, i'm talking about the Hawks crying to the league about something. Especially after the farse Packer ending and Sherman getting overturned due to a technicality. |
Oh please. Because things went Seattle's way means they can't complain about something that everyone else in the league is saying too? That's lousy.
So if the call was reversed that day against the Packers you'd have no problem with them complaining about the field? Or is it the cocky corner, bully/thug other corner, and crazy coach that's grinding your gears?
_________________
Xbox Gamertag: SupeR G00F |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nugpimpen
Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 22400
Location: 10 Miles South of Cleveland
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SupeRG00F wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Seahawk719 wrote: | | patsfan25 wrote: | | Isn't this like the 10th time the Seahawks wanted the NFL to review something this season? I find that ironic considering how they run fake punts on incompetent opponents when up 75-0, and how they question their class moves late in the games. |
lol a patriots fan complaining about teams running up the score. Too funny |
Is he wrong?
No |
Is he wrong?
Yes
It was 42-17. not 75-0. If only it was. That'd really get you guys going. |
I'm not talking about the score, i'm talking about the Hawks crying to the league about something. Especially after the farse Packer ending and Sherman getting overturned due to a technicality. |
Oh please. Because things went Seattle's way means they can't complain about something that everyone else in the league is saying too? That's lousy.
So if the call was reversed that day against the Packers you'd have no problem with them complaining about the field? Or is it the cocky corner, bully/thug other corner, and crazy coach that's grinding your gears? |
It's ironic because there have been what, 8 other games played this year and no one else complained.
I don't have anything against the Hawks, my biggest gripe was having it called out as ironic that it was said by a Pats fan.
_________________
| catcheryea wrote: | | Harper41 wrote: | | And why is this turning into the Auburn WR vs OSU WR |
Because the game won't be close, so they have to make something competitive. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SupeRG00F
Joined: 12 Aug 2012
Posts: 1584
Location: Vancouver, Wa
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 6:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nugpimpen wrote: | It's ironic because there have been what, 8 other games played this year and no one else complained.
I don't have anything against the Hawks, my biggest gripe was having it called out as ironic that it was said by a Pats fan. |
It hadn't gotten bad till late in the season. Washington played at home on the 9th of December and then again on the 30th against the Cowboy's. The turf looked bad that game and worse against Seattle.
Why did that bug you? Patriot fans talking about a team running up a score is ironic. Is it not?
_________________
Xbox Gamertag: SupeR G00F |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BlueOne
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Posts: 1895
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nugpimpen wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Seahawk719 wrote: | | patsfan25 wrote: | | Isn't this like the 10th time the Seahawks wanted the NFL to review something this season? I find that ironic considering how they run fake punts on incompetent opponents when up 75-0, and how they question their class moves late in the games. |
lol a patriots fan complaining about teams running up the score. Too funny |
Is he wrong?
No |
Is he wrong?
Yes
It was 42-17. not 75-0. If only it was. That'd really get you guys going. |
I'm not talking about the score, i'm talking about the Hawks crying to the league about something. Especially after the farse Packer ending and Sherman getting overturned due to a technicality. |
Oh please. Because things went Seattle's way means they can't complain about something that everyone else in the league is saying too? That's lousy.
So if the call was reversed that day against the Packers you'd have no problem with them complaining about the field? Or is it the cocky corner, bully/thug other corner, and crazy coach that's grinding your gears? |
It's ironic because there have been what, 8 other games played this year and no one else complained.
I don't have anything against the Hawks, my biggest gripe was having it called out as ironic that it was said by a Pats fan. |
This "technicality" thing is [inappropriate/removed]. Sherman's suspension was overturned because he was never proven guilty. This isn't a, "well we beat him with a stick after arresting him so lets not charge him anymore" situation. This is a "the nfl couldn't prove its case" situation. And the nfl couldn't even prove its case in a guilty until proven innocent system.
Go read the judge's opinion. The lab tech lied on the stand repeatedly and more than that, he failed to follow procedure and have a second tech do the second test as required. Meaning, the lying tech was the only person involved to testify. This is why Sherman won. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tatupu_64
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 22561
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nugpimpen wrote: | | SupeRG00F wrote: | | nugpimpen wrote: | | Seahawk719 wrote: | | patsfan25 wrote: | | Isn't this like the 10th time the Seahawks wanted the NFL to review something this season? I find that ironic considering how they run fake punts on incompetent opponents when up 75-0, and how they question their class moves late in the games. |
lol a patriots fan complaining about teams running up the score. Too funny |
Is he wrong?
No |
Is he wrong?
Yes
It was 42-17. not 75-0. If only it was. That'd really get you guys going. |
I'm not talking about the score, i'm talking about the Hawks crying to the league about something. Especially after the farse Packer ending and Sherman getting overturned due to a technicality. |
no one crowd to the league. Carol answered a question and said the field sucked. The league took it as a formal complaint. Read a little before you start whining.
_________________
 <Rammy
#1 ET Supporter |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
McNabbMcFadden
Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 34652
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| TheKillerNacho wrote: | | I really think the field needs to be improved though, for player safety. If the NFL truly has safety as one of their #1 priorities, they will force the Skins to improve the conditions of the field. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phire
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 53016
Location: #FSU #championchip #2012BirdsHoF #2012GoldStnd #YAKtoseIntolerant #TrollyRangers #Danes #CAVALRY
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
The complaint is legitimate and 100% warranted.
This is not an issue of competitive advantage.
_________________
| theuntouchable wrote: | | Think about this phire. I am the real chow. |
| RainbowCarebear wrote: | | Only for the quick and lucky. |
Dear Eagles Forum: Click >here< to make your own mock. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
waremd
Joined: 26 Jan 2012
Posts: 933
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| patsfan25 wrote: | | Isn't this like the 10th time the Seahawks wanted the NFL to review something this season? I find that ironic considering how they run fake punts on incompetent opponents when up 75-0, and how they question their class moves late in the games. |
Agreed 100%, Carroll is bringing his classless self-professed attitude to Seattle and making them a dirty and complaint-riddled team. If things don't go right they have to cry and then their players have to do PEDs to get the upper hand, but don't try to call them on it, they'll pull the Braun card.
I am sure the field was reviewed and approved before they even took the field on Sunday, just something else for Carroll to whine about.
_________________
Future Starting Safety for the Cowboys
^---Props to thesickness89 for the sig ---^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
EliteTexan80
Joined: 30 Apr 2007
Posts: 38201
Location: Three time Mr. fanTASTic!
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| nugpimpen wrote: | | I don't have anything against the Hawks, my biggest gripe was having it called out as ironic that it was said by a Pats fan. |
In the initial statement - it IS ironic because the Pats did the same thing about the turf at Reliant Stadium, following the knee buckle and subsequent ACL/MCL tear of WR Wes Welker.
_________________
| vike daddy wrote: | | EliteTexan80 wrote: | | I wanna be a mod. |
vastly over rated. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SnA ExclusiVe
Joined: 01 Jun 2011
Posts: 35025
Location: Spokane, WA
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Lol at people who think the complaint is 100% legit because the Seahawks won, or something like that. It IS 100% legit. You could see players slipping and falling down all freaking night and eventually it was the turf that was the final straw to RGIII's season this year.
Bottom line - multi-million dollar stadiums shouldn't have grass fields that lookk they were imported from a 3rd world country, which is EXACTLY what FedEx looked like last weekend. Furthermore, with the "emphasis" on player safety that the NFL has taken, why do they allow such poor field conditions, which OBVIOUSLY have an effect on players (Clemons, RGIII, Wes Welker, etc.) and can lead to knee injuries and career-threatening injuries? If this field met the standards, the standards need to be improved.
I guess at this point in the season, people just love to hate the Seahawks for anything they do.
_________________
XBL GT: SnA ExclusiVe
SteamID: A Flacco Seagulls |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
