Matt Ryan vs Tony Romo

[canadaluvsdalla]

If you look at Matt Ryan's supporting cast I don't even know how they even lost a game.

His team is clearly carrying him
_________________

[GSUeagles14]

[FalconFan13]

[Matts4313]

[RainbowCarebear]

Ryan.
_________________

"Of gold and silver and gemstones, it had none; bronze and iron were the metals of winter"
"He is part of you, Robb. To fear him is to fear you."
"These are northmen, Uncle. The north remembers."

[tom cody]

Matt Ryan.
_________________
Hey there, Blimpy Boy, flying through the sky so fancy.. free..

[Strat]

I don't get these people that say Matt Ryan has a ridiculously good supporting cast as an argument against him. A talented offense? Yes, but when you look closer the stuff he has to work with around him isn't that much better than the other top quarterbacks. First off, his O-line is mediocre at best and Michael Turner is probably one of the worst starting backs in the league. He has a nice piece to work with in Quizz but he's nothing special. Then he's got Tony Gonzalez who's approaching his 40's and people act like he's still in his prime. Obviously Roddy and Julio are great weapons but that excuse is rarely made for say Rodgers or Eli who have just as good weapons. The Falcons had like 4 wins before Matt got there, and he turned them around into a winning franchise. If you do more than look at box scores with this team you know that he was at the forefront of that success. He was not a product of those around him. To choose Romo at this point in their careers is laughable.

[Dunderhead]

[NoFlyZone]

Romo has to deal with far more issues with his offense than Ryan does. Actually, I'm pretty sure Ryan doesn't have any issues with his offense that he has to worry about at all. Romo on the other hand has zero reliable running game, plays behind one of the worst (if not THE worst) pass protecting o-lines, and only has one consistent receiving weapon in Dez Bryant as Miles Austin has been injured for the past two seasons and Witten, while awesome at moving the chains, really hasn't been a huge weapon as he disappears in the red zone (3 TDs this year, 2 from Romo).

Ryan on the other hand has an O-Line that is probably above average (basically the Great Wall of China compared to what Romo has), and two very dangerous/consistent receiving threats in Julio Jones and Roddy White. Probably the most dangerous receiving threat in the NFL. On top of that he has arguably the best tight end to ever play the game. Hes similar to Witten in a lot of ways, but hes a far bigger threat in the endzone. The Falcons had kind of a bad year running the football, but it still wasn't as bad as the Cowboy's run game.

So basically Matt Ryan has the better overall team around him compared to Romo. That being said, Romo has beaten Ryan out production wise every year since Ryan entered the league. In other words, Romo does more, with less. How then could Ryan be the better quarterback? It makes no logical sense. Romo > Ryan any day of the week and twice on Sunday.

If Matt Ryan played for the Cowboys he would probably be a 'Mark Sanchez - like' quarterback.
_________________

[maggot]

^^^^ wow your a joke you obviously didnt watch a single falcon game did ya
_________________

Jgoldiscool is da man ^^^
2012 Adopt a Falcon: Matt Ryan

[pierrepet]

[Greene N White]

All Ryan does is blindly chuck it up and hopes Julio catches it half the time...
_________________

[BBIB]

[BladeKor]

[FalconFan13]