| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
TomRalph 
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 Posts: 5816 Location: Leeds, England
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:27 pm Post subject: Which Number Draft Pick Has Produced The Best? |
|
|
|
A fun little game to play, grouping players by the number pick used to select them, which draft slot has produced the best players in terms of value and productivity since 2008? I'm going with a Top 10 for now, but may extend it if I have the willpower.
1st Overall:
Jake Long, Matthew Stafford, Sam Bradford, Cam Newton, Andrew Luck
2nd Overall:
Chris Long, Jason Smith, Ndamakong Suh, Von Miller, Robert Griffin III
3rd Overall:
Matt Ryan, Tyson Jackson, Gerald McCoy, Marcel Dareus, Trent Richardson
4th Overall:
Darren McFadden, Aaron Curry, Trent Williams, AJ Green, Matt Kalil
5th Overall:
Glenn Dorsey, Mark Sanchez, Eric Berry. Patrick Peterson, Justin Blackmon
6th Overall:
Vernon Gholston, Andre Smith, Russell Okung, Julio Jones, Morris Claiborne
7th Overall:
Sedrick Ellis, Darius Heyward-Bey, Joe Haden, Aldon Smith, Mark Barron
8th Overall:
Derrick Harvey, Eugene Monroe. Rolando McClain, Jake Locker, Ryan Tannehill
9th Overall:
Keith Rivers, BJ Raji, CJ Spiller, Tyron Smith, Luke Kuechley
10th Overall:
Jerod Mayo, Michael Crabtree, Tyson Alualu, Blaine Gabbert, Stephon Gilmore
What I really noticed was how there seems to be at least one bust in pretty much every group and alot of them drafted by the Raiders or Jaguars (sorry guys)
I think I'd have to go with 2nd Overall though as the strongest group, (which should be somewhat expected) despite the major bust Jason Smith, all the other guys are very good to elite players at important positions.
The 5th Overall group though, wow, not too much to write home about there, no one has really established themselves at elite at their position, and for 5 Top 5 selections, for none of them to achieve that distinction is atrocious.
It'll be interesting, if I continue this for the entire 1st Round, if there is any particular draft slots that are particularly strong and could this sort of data (a push to call it that) be used in terms of draft strategy in the future? _________________
| Jmacz008 (With the 32nd Pick of the 2014 NFL Draft) wrote: | | ...the New England Rutgers select, Rutgers Rutgers, Rutgers from Rutgers |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TomRalph 
Joined: 03 Apr 2009 Posts: 5816 Location: Leeds, England
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Please move to NFL General  _________________
| Jmacz008 (With the 32nd Pick of the 2014 NFL Draft) wrote: | | ...the New England Rutgers select, Rutgers Rutgers, Rutgers from Rutgers |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
epicMustache 
Joined: 19 Jul 2010 Posts: 631 Location: Tallahassee
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think the 2nd overall is probably the best out of the top 10 _________________
| THE PACK MAN wrote: | | ... but the Packers wouldnt be as good if they had the 49ers defense. |
- Adopt a Buc -
Dallas Clark - TE - 47 REC, 435 YDS, 4 TDs, 9.3 AVG |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GoneWithTheWind 
Joined: 01 Jun 2012 Posts: 922 Location: TommyC376=The Best Sig Maker.
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
2nd Overall. 4th Overall is pretty solid as well.
8th Overall is pretty brutal besides Eugene Monroe _________________
Now or Never Christian Ponder.
Note to Self: Sig Bet with Ramster. Viking Tracker 0-0. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
joru1000
Joined: 23 Jan 2012 Posts: 1816
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Jeez, if you're a defensive tackle and you go number 3, you're gonna have a bad time. I sure hope Star isn't going to the Raiders. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Victor Cruz Pun 
Joined: 11 Feb 2012 Posts: 2530
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 2nd overall. Besides Jason Smith that's an elite group. Pick 4 has some very solid players too, it would look even better if Knapp's scheme didn't make DMC look pedestrian this season, it's a shame too he was healthy the whole year and it was basically wasted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chris00cm 
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 Posts: 16229 Location: St. Charles, Missouri
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'd say pick 2, like everyone else.
But this just goes to show that you do not have to have a high pick to pick an elite player in the draft. There are a bunch of disappointing players on that list. _________________
Xbox Live Gamertag: Chris Sanity |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
FireC
Joined: 29 Dec 2010 Posts: 114
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:53 pm Post subject: Re: Which Number Draft Pick Has Produced The Best? |
|
|
|
| 2nd perhaps? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlphaQHard 
Joined: 13 Jan 2013 Posts: 110
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
2,1, 4 _________________
-sig made by me but not my drawings
1st and Gore |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
playmaker8267 
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 7937 Location: University of New Hampshire
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Agree with the consensus of 2nd overall. 5th overall is interesting; if Dorsey goes to another team that fits him better, I still think he could forge a decent career. Then you have Eric Berry and Patrick Peterson, two of the best at their respective positions already, then there's the unlimited potential of Justin Blackmon. There's a good deal of promise in the 5th overall slot if Blackmon develops into a no. 1 receiver. _________________
Bruins // Patriots // Red Sox // Chelsea |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adrenaline_Flux 
Joined: 19 Dec 2008 Posts: 15130 Location: The Iowa
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
#1: 76%
#2: 80%
#3: 68%
#4: 72%
#5: 64%
#6: 72%
#7: 72%
#8: 40%
#9: 76%
#10: 68%
Tier One
#2
Tier Two
#1
#9
Tier Three
#4
#6
#7
Tier Four
#3
#10
Tier Five
#5
Tier WAHT R U DOING EUGENE CAN'T SAVE YOU NOW
#8 _________________
Sig Credit: ChrisC21325 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mich_fan20 
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 16561
|
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I would go 2 too. But what interests me is how much better the last three classes are compared to the first two. _________________
mack. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|