| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
theindianstud12
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Posts: 1803
Location: Chicago
|
 Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:30 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| I love it. We trade back and still get Johnson. That would be amazing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ditchdigger
Joined: 09 Jan 2005
Posts: 14035
Location: Columbus, OH
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| IDOG_det wrote: | | ditchdigger wrote: | | zelbell wrote: | | Can't argue with taking a corner for the Browns |
I can, especially when it's Banks at 6. Awful.
He's not even on my list of top 10 players I would want the Browns to consider, and #1 and #2 are still on the board (Star and Warmack).
Bypassing elite talents for average players at a quote/unquote need position is not smart. Banks isn't even the best corner in this draft, nor is he the second best corner (Milliner and Rhodes are 1-2).
Bad pick is bad. |
Banks is the best CB. General rankings say you're right, but the general rankings aren't always (actually typically never) right. |
That's because generally, Milliner and Rhodes are better CBs than Banks. None of them are worth taking at 6, though. There are better players available at other positions, and I'd be surprised if the Browns go into draft day without a viable veteran free agent CB who could step in opposite Haden. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
INbengalfan
Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 4670
Location: Richmond, IN
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If the bengals decided to take a risk on a medical concern in the first round, it would be on Jarvis Jones, not Lattimore.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ninjapirate
Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 28400
Location: Vegas
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If star is there at 4 he is a no brainer pick for the eagles.
_________________
| UKEaglesFan wrote: | | Searching for Brooklyn Decker Camel on a work laptop - not the smartest thing I've ever done! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ochocinco4pres
Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 21371
Location: Indianapolis Indiana
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If the Bengals take Lattimore there over guys like Vaccaro, I will lose it
_________________
Big thanks to kacymcbryant18 for the sig....^^ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BengalsEra
Joined: 31 Dec 2012
Posts: 350
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 49ers Finest wrote: | | IDOG_det wrote: | | 49ers Finest wrote: | I know they grabbed williams instead of star. But then you forgot star totally  |
I knew I was forgetting someone  |
just give him to the niners. hes too fat, so he fell  |
that sounds like burfict last year. same thing will happen and he'll go undrafted and marvin lewis will sign him right after the draft  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BengalsEra
Joined: 31 Dec 2012
Posts: 350
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 5:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| INbengalfan wrote: | | If the bengals decided to take a risk on a medical concern in the first round, it would be on Jarvis Jones, not Lattimore. |
actually it would be on Lattimore not jones. Jones is a 3-4 OLB which doesnt mix with the Bengals system at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ttitansfan4life
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 18363
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Great Titans pick but it has to be a joke mock right? Manuel at 2? Williams at 3? Although I'd love theJags to take Manuel that high.
_________________
Props to "Joe is the Best" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AQuintus
Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Posts: 656
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 7:28 pm Post subject: Re: 1 round with trades, I guarantee it's different EDIT 2/1 |
|
|
|
| IDOG_det wrote: |
Trade: Steelers trade #17 to the Vikings for #23 and their 3rd
17- Vikings from Steelers- Sam Montgomery DE
|
So Minnesota trades up from 23 (where Keenan Allen, an insanely obvious pick is available) in order to reach on a guy who doesn't fit a need and would be fourth on their DE depth chart?
WTF ?!? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
steelers75
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 718
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 8:33 pm Post subject: draft |
|
|
|
| why would the steelers trade down for mingo when they could have jarvis jones at 17 in your mock? wouldnt make much sense. if jones is their at 17 i think he would be the steelers pick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BillsGuy82
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 6644
Location: Niagara Falls
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
So we ignore OLB, MLB, QB, WR and CB our top 5 needs for a OLineman when we extended Kraig Urbik and likely keeping Levitre.
Does it make any sense to let Levitre walk only to draft another Guard in 1st when we have TONS of cap space? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bowler1215
Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Posts: 5176
Location: Illinois
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 2:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good trade and pick for the Bears
_________________
Adopt a Bear:
Devin Hester |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
INbengalfan
Joined: 21 Jan 2006
Posts: 4670
Location: Richmond, IN
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BengalsEra wrote: | | INbengalfan wrote: | | If the bengals decided to take a risk on a medical concern in the first round, it would be on Jarvis Jones, not Lattimore. |
actually it would be on Lattimore not jones. Jones is a 3-4 OLB which doesnt mix with the Bengals system at all. |
He's fast enough to play OLB in a 4-3
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BengalsEra
Joined: 31 Dec 2012
Posts: 350
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| INbengalfan wrote: | | BengalsEra wrote: | | INbengalfan wrote: | | If the bengals decided to take a risk on a medical concern in the first round, it would be on Jarvis Jones, not Lattimore. |
actually it would be on Lattimore not jones. Jones is a 3-4 OLB which doesnt mix with the Bengals system at all. |
He's fast enough to play OLB in a 4-3 |
If the Bengals would draft him, you woudprobably see some 4-3 and some 3-4 throughout the year and/or jones would be moved to DE where his skills can best be utilized. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Broncody
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 235
Location: Burlington IA
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| I think it is hilarious that some people are taking this mock seriously. I enjoyed the comments immensely, obviously not a fan of the Broncos selection, but I suspect that was the intention. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
