| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Is it a smart move to transfer to UNLV versus another school? |
| Yes |
|
57% |
[ 11 ] |
| No |
|
42% |
[ 8 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 19 |
|
| Author |
Message |
NateDawg
Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 14768
Location: Hilliard
|
 Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 8:30 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
he just needs to play at a good program where he has the opportunity, because this guy can play at the next level if he gets the chance. I don't know that he should stay in the same conference as USC, but the guy needs a new start. He won't beat out Sanchez or Booty in the long run. He's drawing dead.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RD
Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Posts: 2958
Location: Long Beach, CA
|
| Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Vigilante wrote: |
I see your perspective, but what if UCLA just hasnt had a game-breaking WR they way many other universities have? |
I think they have though. With talent along the likes of Craig Bragg, Tab Perry, and Marcedes Lewis, they have had a lot of talent at receiver. Better than a lot of schools.
| Quote: | I definatley disagree with this. 1) Their definatley on the rise. The fact that they can compete with top-notch programs like USC (that was a good game  ) while not getting too many blue-chip recuits illustrate the Bruins potential. I also believe that they are on the rise. Karl Dorell is a good coach and he knows what he is doing and along with a rejuvenated staff, I expect the team to get better. Also, Wyoming is actually quite a good program and QB Bramlet aint too bad...
I can definatley see this program turning it around in the future... |
They did give SC a game, but I dont think that was indicative of the year they had. And while they havent had truly elite classes, they have landed some high quality talent. They seem to always land top safeties, they've had PErry, Lewis, Drew, White, Brown, etc as highly sought after recruits. They just haven't made the best of it.
Id love for UCLA to come back, cuz its much more fun to watch tight games between SC and UCLA and to have two local teams in the national spotlight, but I dont think its happening anytime soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NateDawg
Joined: 03 Apr 2005
Posts: 14768
Location: Hilliard
|
| Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
no california teams in the future will likely compete with USC (i know cal did this year). Right now, if USC wants a recruit from California, they can get him. They have such a recruiting edge right now. They get every top prospect from the west and other tops from the east, north, and south. I just don't see a team like UCLA really competing for a long time, unless their coaching staff does real well with the players.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
