| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Thelonebillsfan
Joined: 22 Jan 2009
Posts: 29448
Location: In the ether
|
 Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:09 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Like his biggest knock has always always always been his consistency. EJ has a good arm. EJ was big strong and ran like a fullback. EJ has spotty accuracy which means he never could put it fully together.
Watson has the benefit of an amazing team around him but he and EJ to me are exactly the same as prospects.
Projects.
_________________
Adopt a Bill: WR, Robert Woods 5 rec, 86 Yards, 1 TD's
Adopt a Bill: DE/OLB, Mario Williams 8 TKLS, 4.5 Sacks, 4.5 TFL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tk3
Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Posts: 4203
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I stand by my Cardale Jones comments.
If we want to take a shot at progressing an athletic, but unpolished QB, we already have that on the roster.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BillsGuy82
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 12415
Location: Niagara Falls
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bigbadbuff23835 wrote: | | billzz wrote: | | cdavls17 wrote: | | If bills traded down from 10 to late teens early 20s I would be good with Howard but not top 10. He is definitely a 1st rd player and wont last until rd 2 |
here Bills fans go again..
we don't need another TE, especially not bad enough to take one in the 1st round. Jake Butt just tore his ACL, taking him in the 5th and allowing him to heal to pair with O'Leary and Clay.. makes a lot more sense then drafting a TE that won't even be the best on our team in the 1st round.
Hooker if available, Peppers isn't even a constellation prize.. if not one of them, Cam Robinson would look good in Bills blue. |
Lmao. Wtf is a constelllation?
I want Hooker or Peppers bad. I think Hooker ends up coming out, his value might be at an all time high. |
A grouping of stars or something like that
Malik Hooker and Mike Williams are my top 2 guys at 10 assuming Adams is off the board |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
joutman
Joined: 17 Apr 2006
Posts: 1094
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 8:26 pm Post subject: 10 th pick |
|
|
|
Williams and Hooker are also my two favorite picks for 10
Williams and Budda Baker in the second
or
Hooker or KD Cannon in the second
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Billsfaninptown
Joined: 28 Feb 2009
Posts: 234
Location: Portland
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
So after watching the natty, I want Mike Williams REALLY BAD! Guy is a freak.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NickChowaniec
Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 5674
Location: Buffalo
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Billsfaninptown wrote: | | So after watching the natty, I want Mike Williams REALLY BAD! Guy is a freak. |
I wanted him before. Now I REALLLLLLLY want that kid.
I wouldn't be mad if we got Watson after that game... incredible game.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Billsfaninptown
Joined: 28 Feb 2009
Posts: 234
Location: Portland
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NickChowaniec wrote: | | Billsfaninptown wrote: | | So after watching the natty, I want Mike Williams REALLY BAD! Guy is a freak. |
I wanted him before. Now I REALLLLLLLY want that kid.
I wouldn't be mad if we got Watson after that game... incredible game. |
I think Williams would be the perfect fit for our offense. We need a big receiver that can attack the ball at the highest point. He would be a lethal red zone weapon. Also another guy that stood out to me last night was Ryan Anderson. He was all over the field and was constantly in the backfield. I think he might be there in the second round.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LeeEvans
Joined: 01 Jan 2007
Posts: 25164
Location: 410 MD
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Billsfaninptown wrote: | | NickChowaniec wrote: | | Billsfaninptown wrote: | | So after watching the natty, I want Mike Williams REALLY BAD! Guy is a freak. |
I wanted him before. Now I REALLLLLLLY want that kid.
I wouldn't be mad if we got Watson after that game... incredible game. |
I think Williams would be the perfect fit for our offense. We need a big receiver that can attack the ball at the highest point. He would be a lethal red zone weapon. Also another guy that stood out to me last night was Ryan Anderson. He was all over the field and was constantly in the backfield. I think he might be there in the second round. |
Williams would be awesome but I think he'll unfortunately be gone before we pick. It's still so far away that guessing where any player will go is a complete guess.
I can't shake this nightmare of the Bills letting go of Tyrod to draft Tyrod, I mean Deshaun Watson, It would all just be so Bill-sy of them.
_________________
The night is dark and full of terrors.
Sacrifice … is never easy, Davos. Or it is no true sacrifice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Billsfaninptown
Joined: 28 Feb 2009
Posts: 234
Location: Portland
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| LeeEvans wrote: | | Billsfaninptown wrote: | | NickChowaniec wrote: | | Billsfaninptown wrote: | | So after watching the natty, I want Mike Williams REALLY BAD! Guy is a freak. |
I wanted him before. Now I REALLLLLLLY want that kid.
I wouldn't be mad if we got Watson after that game... incredible game. |
I think Williams would be the perfect fit for our offense. We need a big receiver that can attack the ball at the highest point. He would be a lethal red zone weapon. Also another guy that stood out to me last night was Ryan Anderson. He was all over the field and was constantly in the backfield. I think he might be there in the second round. |
Williams would be awesome but I think he'll unfortunately be gone before we pick. It's still so far away that guessing where any player will go is a complete guess.
I can't shake this nightmare of the Bills letting go of Tyrod to draft Tyrod, I mean Deshaun Watson, It would all just be so Bill-sy of them. |
We should have dibbs on Mike Williams. His last name is Williams and he is from Clemson.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Thelonebillsfan
Joined: 22 Jan 2009
Posts: 29448
Location: In the ether
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Told y'all he'd test upwards.
Kid is a freak. He's gonna play up extremely well in shorts.
_________________
Adopt a Bill: WR, Robert Woods 5 rec, 86 Yards, 1 TD's
Adopt a Bill: DE/OLB, Mario Williams 8 TKLS, 4.5 Sacks, 4.5 TFL |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
McKelvin28
Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Posts: 556
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Am I crazy for being intrigued by the idea of having Shady and Fournette in the same backfield? If there was a situation where Williams, Hooker, Adams, and Foster are all off the board I think that's where i'd want to go. That tandem combined with our offensive line could get us to the playoffs even with an average QB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bigbadbuff23835
Joined: 22 Sep 2008
Posts: 11488
Location: NY
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| McKelvin28 wrote: | | Am I crazy for being intrigued by the idea of having Shady and Fournette in the same backfield? If there was a situation where Williams, Hooker, Adams, and Foster are all off the board I think that's where i'd want to go. That tandem combined with our offensive line could get us to the playoffs even with an average QB. |
Are you out of your mind?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Whitner20
Joined: 14 Feb 2007
Posts: 1417
Location: Rochester, NY
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| McKelvin28 wrote: | | Am I crazy for being intrigued by the idea of having Shady and Fournette in the same backfield? If there was a situation where Williams, Hooker, Adams, and Foster are all off the board I think that's where i'd want to go. That tandem combined with our offensive line could get us to the playoffs even with an average QB. |
I would think by this point the Bills would have learned from their mistakes of the past and stopped picking running backs in the first round.
_________________
Impossible is Nothing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
McKelvin28
Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Posts: 556
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bigbadbuff23835 wrote: | | McKelvin28 wrote: | | Am I crazy for being intrigued by the idea of having Shady and Fournette in the same backfield? If there was a situation where Williams, Hooker, Adams, and Foster are all off the board I think that's where i'd want to go. That tandem combined with our offensive line could get us to the playoffs even with an average QB. |
Are you out of your mind? |
So I'll take that as a yes 
I think Fournette is easily the most talented back to come out in the last 5 years (over Zeke and Gurley) and the idea of having a power + speed tandem like that seems interesting to me. I've always been a huge believer in BPA no matter what. Just thought it was a better path than forcing another QB or reaching for a RT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BillsGuy82
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 12415
Location: Niagara Falls
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| McKelvin28 wrote: | | Am I crazy for being intrigued by the idea of having Shady and Fournette in the same backfield? If there was a situation where Williams, Hooker, Adams, and Foster are all off the board I think that's where i'd want to go. That tandem combined with our offensive line could get us to the playoffs even with an average QB. |
Yes you are lol.
We have more pressing needs than another RB and I don't agree he is a better prospect than Elliott or Gurley |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
