Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Chargerbuckeyes April Edition Mock Draft 7 days away 1 RD
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> 2017 NFL Mock Draft
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
chargerbuckeye


Joined: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1610
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

INbengalfan wrote:
Barnett seems to be the popular choice of the week, and it obviously makes sense.

Personally, I'd have a hard time passing on Adams there though


Last time I mocked Jamaal Adams to the bengals, Ya'll got pissed by the thought of the pick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mudderfudder77


Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 2438
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just can't see the Bears going WR with a top 10 pick. Yes, they lost Jeffery, but I think WR is still pretty far down the long list of needs the Bears have.

Jamal Adams, OJ Howard, and Deshaun Watson are all available to them (in this mock) and seem like more likely picks if the Bears trade down to 8.
_________________


Adopt-a-Bear Lamarr Houston

Man-child. QB-killer. Defender of the run. Destroyer of worlds
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The OUTLAW


Joined: 05 Jan 2005
Posts: 8637
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No good reason for the Browns to move down
_________________
You show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser

Vince Lombardi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
onejayhawk


Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 7549
Location: Waco, Tx
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my contest I have NYJ trading up for him. The Bears trade back and take their QB.

J
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Bianconero


Joined: 13 Jul 2013
Posts: 5518
Location: Polo Lounge
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

chargerbuckeye wrote:
Mr.O wrote:
We'd go Adams or Hooker here, haven't been connected to Allen in anyway and we don't need another 5T/3T


Sheldon Richardson is as good as gone. Allen is the replacement

I'm not slotting you one of those safeties. My bolts will have their choice between the 2 safeties. But the Jets could easily trade back and they are trying to as well.
Lol wut
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr.O


Joined: 11 Jan 2014
Posts: 3887
Location: Parts Unknown
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

chargerbuckeye wrote:
Mr.O wrote:
We'd go Adams or Hooker here, haven't been connected to Allen in anyway and we don't need another 5T/3T


Sheldon Richardson is as good as gone. Allen is the replacement

I'm not slotting you one of those safeties. My bolts will have their choice between the 2 safeties. But the Jets could easily trade back and they are trying to as well.
there looking to move him because he plays the same spot as Leonard and Mo, we aren't looking for another 5T type we're looking for a DE/OLB type or DB help. Jamal Adams would be the BPA and would fill a top 2/3 need.
_________________

Props El Ramster on the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr.O


Joined: 11 Jan 2014
Posts: 3887
Location: Parts Unknown
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bianconero wrote:
chargerbuckeye wrote:
Mr.O wrote:
We'd go Adams or Hooker here, haven't been connected to Allen in anyway and we don't need another 5T/3T


Sheldon Richardson is as good as gone. Allen is the replacement

I'm not slotting you one of those safeties. My bolts will have their choice between the 2 safeties. But the Jets could easily trade back and they are trying to as well.
Lol wut
lmao
_________________

Props El Ramster on the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lasus83


Joined: 09 Mar 2006
Posts: 3511
Location: Charlotte, NC
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

chargerbuckeye wrote:
Zithers wrote:
i very strongly doubt the panthers trade up... especially in this scenario where you have jamal adams, oj howard, and christian mccaffrey all there at 8.


Carolina is ennamoured by Fournette, and he does not pass Jacksonville at 4.


Why does he not pass Jacksonville at 4? A case can be made that they are just as likely to take QB as they are RB at 4... and neither are their biggest needs.

With both QB and RB, they have an established starter, recent draft pick and significant money invested.

With both QB and RB, they have other positions that should be much higher on their board.

Jax is not a lock to take Fournette... not any more than SF or the Jets.
_________________
Carolina Panthers

FFMD 15 - General Manager
FFMD 16 - Asst. General Manager
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
chargerbuckeye


Joined: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1610
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lasus83 wrote:
chargerbuckeye wrote:
Zithers wrote:
i very strongly doubt the panthers trade up... especially in this scenario where you have jamal adams, oj howard, and christian mccaffrey all there at 8.


Carolina is ennamoured by Fournette, and he does not pass Jacksonville at 4.


Why does he not pass Jacksonville at 4? A case can be made that they are just as likely to take QB as they are RB at 4... and neither are their biggest needs.

With both QB and RB, they have an established starter, recent draft pick and significant money invested.

With both QB and RB, they have other positions that should be much higher on their board.

Jax is not a lock to take Fournette... not any more than SF or the Jets.



Every move Jacksonville made this offseason suggest Leonard Fournette is the pick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chargerbuckeye


Joined: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1610
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr.O wrote:
chargerbuckeye wrote:
Mr.O wrote:
We'd go Adams or Hooker here, haven't been connected to Allen in anyway and we don't need another 5T/3T


Sheldon Richardson is as good as gone. Allen is the replacement

I'm not slotting you one of those safeties. My bolts will have their choice between the 2 safeties. But the Jets could easily trade back and they are trying to as well.
there looking to move him because he plays the same spot as Leonard and Mo, we aren't looking for another 5T type we're looking for a DE/OLB type or DB help. Jamal Adams would be the BPA and would fill a top 2/3 need.


The chances of the Jets trading back are high.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr.O


Joined: 11 Jan 2014
Posts: 3887
Location: Parts Unknown
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

chargerbuckeye wrote:
Mr.O wrote:
chargerbuckeye wrote:
Mr.O wrote:
We'd go Adams or Hooker here, haven't been connected to Allen in anyway and we don't need another 5T/3T


Sheldon Richardson is as good as gone. Allen is the replacement

I'm not slotting you one of those safeties. My bolts will have their choice between the 2 safeties. But the Jets could easily trade back and they are trying to as well.
there looking to move him because he plays the same spot as Leonard and Mo, we aren't looking for another 5T type we're looking for a DE/OLB type or DB help. Jamal Adams would be the BPA and would fill a top 2/3 need.


The chances of the Jets trading back are high.
ok that still doesn't change the fact Jon Allen is a bad pick
_________________

Props El Ramster on the sig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ninjapirate


Joined: 14 Jan 2005
Posts: 42581
Location: Vegas
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Think eagles will wait til the mid rounds if they go Ol. Have a lot of depth at the spot right now.
_________________


RainbowCarebear wrote:
Anna Kendricks are always nice.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
rdelaney89


Joined: 22 Jan 2009
Posts: 3829
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So the Jets are going to pass on both Safeties...We better sprint to the podium for Adams. Fans would riot if we didn't take one of those 2 since they are easily our biggest weakness. (outside QB)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bucsfan333


Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 38267
Location: the mitten
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It wouldn't be my first choice, but I could see Licht doing it. If he likes a guy, he goes and gets him.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
chargerbuckeye


Joined: 09 Oct 2014
Posts: 1610
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 7:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rdelaney89 wrote:
So the Jets are going to pass on both Safeties...We better sprint to the podium for Adams. Fans would riot if we didn't take one of those 2 since they are easily our biggest weakness. (outside QB)



When I make my next mock, the Jets will probably trade out of 6 to cleveland at 12. That trade is a hot rumor is have been hearing as of late, possibly 13 to Arizona. It's no secret that the Jets are trying to trade back and same with SF. What that leads me to actually believe is that they are interested in a qb, but not at that spot in the draft. Though I have jon allen slotted at NY, I could easily slot a qb at 6 whether the Jets, Cardinals or Browns are picking at 6.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> 2017 NFL Mock Draft All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group