Discuss football with over 40,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Team Needs
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Cincinnati Bengals
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bengals Backer


Joined: 25 Jan 2009
Posts: 693
Location: Columbus, Oh
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The top three places I think we need help at next year are...

#1 Tight end. Our tight ends need a lot of help. Foshi could be a decent back up with Coffman as a starter. If we could get the TE from Oklahoma in the 1st round our TE would be solid.

#2 Safety. Williams (on a one year deal) has been hurt most of the season and after Crocker and Ndukwe we have no one.

#3 DT. Johnson foot is hurt (on a one year deal also) and while Sims and Peko have been good we still need another good DT to help out.
_________________

Thanks Deadpulse for the sig.
I bleed Orange and Black
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beck Bristow


Moderator
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 4439
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know that safety is a huge need. Williams has played well when in there, but his health is questionable. I think we bring him back to go with Crocker, Ndukwe and Herbert. That gives us decent starters as well as flexibility to draft a safety if they are bpa. I would not stress if we didn't take any though. I think drafting a TE is a given, and another DT would be great, although I would love to get Richard Seymour in the offseason.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Torres8518


Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 1386
Location: Detroit, Michigan
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 5:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think this is a great year for TE's so we may not even need to use a first. A lot of people have Dennis Pitta out of BYU going in like the 4th so I think we should get him.
_________________
Bengals Pro Bowl Watch
Chad OchoCinco, Cedric Benson, Leon Hall, Evan Mathis, Bobbie Williams, Johnathon Joseph, Carson Palmer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kacymcbryant18


Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Posts: 708
Location: Tulsa, OK
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Torres8518 wrote:
I think this is a great year for TE's so we may not even need to use a first. A lot of people have Dennis Pitta out of BYU going in like the 4th so I think we should get him.


Can he block? If he can't then we'll be in the same situation next waiting for a potentially good TE to get up to speed.
_________________
Chad OchoCinco on Eric Ghiaciuc calling him a distraction.--"Ghiaciuc's play was a distraction. Of all people to call me that."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ohiostate#1


Moderator
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 6031
Location: Columbus, Ohio
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kacymcbryant18 wrote:
Torres8518 wrote:
I think this is a great year for TE's so we may not even need to use a first. A lot of people have Dennis Pitta out of BYU going in like the 4th so I think we should get him.


Can he block? If he can't then we'll be in the same situation next waiting for a potentially good TE to get up to speed.

Pitta is not a good blocker. He rarely shows anything in that regard. Not that quick, and undersized.

If we want a TE Anthony McCoy (USC) is the guy. We'll probably have to take him round one, but he's a complete TE. Comes from a pro-style offense, a good blocker, and does a good job separating. Nice hands, decent speed. He's not a game changing receiver, but he's above average in that regard.

If we don't go McCoy we need Colin Peek out of Alabama. He's got great hands, and lacks speed yes, but he's a really good blocker. We could get him late second, maybe third if he falls.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beck Bristow


Moderator
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 4439
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I really do not like the idea of going TE in round one, although I concede it is possible, I also definitely think it is important to address corner early. I'm starting to want a safety more. We are in good shape at strong, but only have Crocker at free. I'm not really crazy about him, but I do like him well enough to look other directions that I think are bigger needs.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
futbudds


Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 230
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beck Bristow wrote:
I really do not like the idea of going TE in round one, although I concede it is possible, I also definitely think it is important to address corner early. I'm starting to want a safety more. We are in good shape at strong, but only have Crocker at free. I'm not really crazy about him, but I do like him well enough to look other directions that I think are bigger needs.


I'm delightfully surprized in Trent's play this year. I thought he made the highlight reel too much at Mich for giving up the big play but he's stepped up in my eyes enough that a third corner isn't as much of a first day need as i thought early in the year.

My vote for first day is two picks for the D's front 7, or a safety. They're close to being stellar, just a stud or two to be in the same talk w the Ravens and Squealers.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
theJ


Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Posts: 8579
Location: The University of Toledo
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

futbudds wrote:
Beck Bristow wrote:
I really do not like the idea of going TE in round one, although I concede it is possible, I also definitely think it is important to address corner early. I'm starting to want a safety more. We are in good shape at strong, but only have Crocker at free. I'm not really crazy about him, but I do like him well enough to look other directions that I think are bigger needs.


I'm delightfully surprized in Trent's play this year. I thought he made the highlight reel too much at Mich for giving up the big play but he's stepped up in my eyes enough that a third corner isn't as much of a first day need as i thought early in the year.

My vote for first day is two picks for the D's front 7, or a safety. They're close to being stellar, just a stud or two to be in the same talk w the Ravens and Squealers.


I kind of agree. I would like to see a few early picks on defensive linemen or linebackers. The defense starts with the front 7. A great front 7 makes an average secondary look amazing.
_________________
The saying is "I couldn't care less". If you could care less, then why bother to tell me?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beck Bristow


Moderator
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 4439
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd like to see two defensive playmakers and a TE with the first 3 picks.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ochocinco4pres


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 11177
Location: bloomington, in
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beck Bristow wrote:
I'd like to see two defensive playmakers and a TE with the first 3 picks.


I highly doubt we go TE. Remember we still have Utecht and Kelly on the roster. Once they are healthy they will be our starters. With those 2, Coffman, Foschi and Coats, I doubt the organization thinks TE is a need.

I want to see a corner and a safety round 1 and 2. Maybe a SAM or DT in the 3rd depending on Tank Johnson leaving.
_________________


Big thanks to kacymcbryant18 for the sig....^^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beck Bristow


Moderator
Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Posts: 4439
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 5:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reggie Kelly is probably done. Utecht is a never was. THey tried to trade the first for Bennett, I think they want a TE, although I wont be heartbroken if we don't.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kacymcbryant18


Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Posts: 708
Location: Tulsa, OK
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree, TE looks to be in the cards.
_________________
Chad OchoCinco on Eric Ghiaciuc calling him a distraction.--"Ghiaciuc's play was a distraction. Of all people to call me that."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
futbudds


Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 230
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 8:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As this year has shown a superstar TE isn't needed but i would love to see it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ROBERTFREEMAN


Joined: 02 Nov 2007
Posts: 229
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

So the Giants proved you can never have too many D linemen. But the only ones that should be available are Odrick Turner and Corey Wooten. So what do we do?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ochocinco4pres


Joined: 04 Apr 2007
Posts: 11177
Location: bloomington, in
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ROBERTFREEMAN wrote:
So the Giants proved you can never have too many D linemen. But the only ones that should be available are Odrick Turner and Corey Wooten. So what do we do?


They will be the only ones left in the 1st round?
_________________


Big thanks to kacymcbryant18 for the sig....^^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Cincinnati Bengals All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 5 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group