Discuss football with over 40,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

DeSean Jackson VS Steve Smith (NYG)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL Comparisons
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Who is the better #1 WR?
DeSean Jackson
52%
 52%  [ 57 ]
Steve Smith
47%
 47%  [ 52 ]
Total Votes : 109

Author Message
Art_Vandalay


Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 11746
Location: Thornton, CO
PostPosted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

blueNorange wrote:
Art_Vandalay wrote:
minutemancl wrote:
EaglesDBs wrote:
MikeyBaltimore wrote:
Smith has better hands and runs considerably better routes. The only thing Jackson has on him is speed.


Considerably better?
Are you serious?

Desean Jackson's route running is crisp, especially for someone so young. Thats one of the reasons he had such a good rookie season. He can run the short, intermediate, and deep routes without problem. I wont say he has better route running than Smith, because I dont follow Smith closely, but Desean has WAYYY more on him than speed.

One thing he does ALOT better than Smith is run after the catch. Thats not even arguable, so I wont go in depth.


Laughing Obviously. Steve Smith is one of the best route runners in the NFL right now. He isn't very fast, big, or strong, so how does he have tremendous stats? Answer- route running. Just look at this.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/new-york-giants/09000d5d812c96bf/Manning-22-yd-TD-pass-to-Steve-Smith

Come back to me when Desean does ANYTHING like this.

3:28-3:41

I'm not going to sit here and act like he's a better router runner, but he's still very good. He has a sick double move.

have any video of him doing it in the nfl and not in college?? Laughing Smile Wink

What's the difference? You think he forgot how to do that after being drafted? Laughing

And no, I couldn't find any video that shows off his route running in the NFL but I've seen him use that double move on defenders several times.

Like said before, I'm not saying he's a better route runner than Smith but it's annoying people say he's much better than Jackson at route running.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
McNabbMcFadden


Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 7658
Location: Lansdale
PostPosted: Tue Nov 03, 2009 11:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

To date if DeSean Jackson caught the same percentage of his teams completions as Steve Smith. DeSean would have the stat line of. 49 Catches, 1014 Yards and 8 TD. (7 Games)

Just sayin... Wink
_________________

A Kiltman Sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eagles27


Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 16254
Location: Vancouver, BC
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 5:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

McNabbMcFadden wrote:
To date if DeSean Jackson caught the same percentage of his teams completions as Steve Smith. DeSean would have the stat line of. 49 Catches, 1014 Yards and 8 TD. (7 Games)

Just sayin... Wink

Shame on you When are you guys going to learn.

Eddie Royal & Steve Smith wish they were DeSean Jackson.

Speaking of Royal:

Royal's 09 Projected Stats:

46 REC / 361 Yards / 0 TD


DeSean's 09 Projected Stats:

55 REC / 1145 Yards / 9 TD's

That doesn't even take into account his rushing statistics. Cool
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raz


Joined: 23 Oct 2009
Posts: 44
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meh... Jackson is a pu$$y though and will not be the "go to guy" and after he loses speed he'll be gone.
He is now though the best weapon in the league i love how he gets open for a +50 yard catch and just how friggen explosive he is.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Art_Vandalay


Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 11746
Location: Thornton, CO
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love how everyone calls Desean scared but provides no examples.

Apparently small = soft and scared.
_________________


Last edited by Art_Vandalay on Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:20 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Art_Vandalay


Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 11746
Location: Thornton, CO
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

blueNorange wrote:
Art_Vandalay wrote:
minutemancl wrote:
EaglesDBs wrote:
MikeyBaltimore wrote:
Smith has better hands and runs considerably better routes. The only thing Jackson has on him is speed.


Considerably better?
Are you serious?

Desean Jackson's route running is crisp, especially for someone so young. Thats one of the reasons he had such a good rookie season. He can run the short, intermediate, and deep routes without problem. I wont say he has better route running than Smith, because I dont follow Smith closely, but Desean has WAYYY more on him than speed.

One thing he does ALOT better than Smith is run after the catch. Thats not even arguable, so I wont go in depth.


Laughing Obviously. Steve Smith is one of the best route runners in the NFL right now. He isn't very fast, big, or strong, so how does he have tremendous stats? Answer- route running. Just look at this.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/new-york-giants/09000d5d812c96bf/Manning-22-yd-TD-pass-to-Steve-Smith

Come back to me when Desean does ANYTHING like this.

3:28-3:41

I'm not going to sit here and act like he's a better router runner, but he's still very good. He has a sick double move.

have any video of him doing it in the nfl and not in college?? Laughing Smile Wink

1:28 Wink
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Raz


Joined: 23 Oct 2009
Posts: 44
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Art_Vandalay wrote:
I love how everyone calls Desean soft but provides no examples.

Apparently small = soft and scared.


Provides no examples.... wut?
He shy's away from contact in a contact sport.
Against redskins if i remember correctly he got a pass in the middle 10 yards from LOS and he saw a LB coming his way so he stopped and didn't try to catch the ball, it was on him.
When he rushes he steppes out of bounds etc. etc. etc

When he gets his first big hit he gonna cry
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Art_Vandalay


Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 11746
Location: Thornton, CO
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raz wrote:
Art_Vandalay wrote:
I love how everyone calls Desean soft but provides no examples.

Apparently small = soft and scared.


Provides no examples.... wut?
He shy's away from contact in a contact sport.
Against redskins if i remember correctly he got a pass in the middle 10 yards from LOS and he saw a LB coming his way so he stopped and didn't try to catch the ball, it was on him.
When he rushes he steppes out of bounds etc. etc. etc

When he gets his first big hit he gonna cry

He sat down in the open space and McNabb just threw a bad ball. He still reached for it. Has he ever gotten alligator arms? No. He got lit up by Laron Landry going over the middle last year while reaching for a catch. He got up and continued playing.

And as far as running out of bounds when he's trapped..... Do you expect a dude who's 5'10 175 lbs to truck people? Laughing

Marvin Harrison did the same thing. Is he scared?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gmen


Joined: 20 Jul 2007
Posts: 9566
Location: It's.... It's..... ....Beautiful
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Raz wrote:
Art_Vandalay wrote:
I love how everyone calls Desean soft but provides no examples.

Apparently small = soft and scared.


Provides no examples.... wut?
He shy's away from contact in a contact sport.
Against redskins if i remember correctly he got a pass in the middle 10 yards from LOS and he saw a LB coming his way so he stopped and didn't try to catch the ball, it was on him.
When he rushes he steppes out of bounds etc. etc. etc

When he gets his first big hit he gonna cry

You can't blame the guy. He's 5'9" 180. His game isn't physicallity, it's speed. At that size, there is no point in taking a hit for 2-3 extra yards after you just torched somebody for 60. He wouldn't last long if he did that.
_________________
Maddhatter wrote:
I'm sick to my stomach after crying myself to sleep last night
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Art_Vandalay


Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 11746
Location: Thornton, CO
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gmen wrote:
Raz wrote:
Art_Vandalay wrote:
I love how everyone calls Desean soft but provides no examples.

Apparently small = soft and scared.


Provides no examples.... wut?
He shy's away from contact in a contact sport.
Against redskins if i remember correctly he got a pass in the middle 10 yards from LOS and he saw a LB coming his way so he stopped and didn't try to catch the ball, it was on him.
When he rushes he steppes out of bounds etc. etc. etc

When he gets his first big hit he gonna cry

You can't blame the guy. He's 5'9" 180. His game isn't physicallity, it's speed. At that size, there is no point in taking a hit for 2-3 extra yards after you just torched somebody for 60. He wouldn't last long if he did that.

Who are you and what have you done with Gmen Razz

Good post though. I completely agree. Imagine Desean trying to truck a LB or S...
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Savage_Seahawks


Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 89
Location: Renton
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gmen wrote:
What BlaqOptic said. But this really is comparing apples to oranges. They're completely different players with different strengths.

I like the Steve Smith - Hines Ward comparison. He's not as physical as Ward, but he's a similar technitian. He just knows how to run routes and get open.

I think the better poll would be Giants receivers or Eagles receivers? I think Smith, Manningham, Nicks > Jackson, Avant, Maclin


if the thread was about that i think it have to be a no brainer its would be the giants hakeem nicks is a stud that has not broken out yet the boy has potential
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Broadway Joe


Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 1838
Location: Point Place, Wisconsin
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Steve Smith is a better pure WR

DeSean Jackson is a better playmaker

And that's it, I think no one can argue that.

I was just thinking about the Giants' WR corps and if Barden pans out (and Smith would more likely be moved to the slot if that's the case, but still we'd see packages moving him all over the field) they might have one of the deepest corps in the NFL in a couple of years.

Manningham, Smith, Nicks and Barden would be scary.
Shocked
_________________

Thanks to Braylon4MVP for the sig and avy!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ClutchCityOwns


Joined: 01 Nov 2009
Posts: 197
Location: Chicago
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Action Jackson, He's just the bigger and better home run hitter, not to mention more versatile and can do more things on the field, Smith is the better blocker though, I'll give him that. But to make it more detailed, Smith is more reliable in a short route play but Jackson is much more reliable in a deep route play with that KILLER speed.

Smith's numbers have become a lot less eye-popping in recent weeks. Jackson has made at least 1 highlight in every single game this season.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Eagles27


Joined: 03 Jan 2007
Posts: 16254
Location: Vancouver, BC
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ClutchCityOwns wrote:
Action Jackson, He's just the bigger and better home run hitter, not to mention more versatile and can do more things on the field, Smith is the better blocker though, I'll give him that. But to make it more detailed, Smith is more reliable in a short route play but Jackson is much more reliable in a deep route play with that KILLER speed.

Smith's numbers have become a lot less eye-popping in recent weeks. Jackson has made at least 1 highlight in every single game this season.

With the exception of the Tampa game.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RoyRogers


Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 1447
Location: Happy Valley
PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 2:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eagles27 wrote:
ClutchCityOwns wrote:
Action Jackson, He's just the bigger and better home run hitter, not to mention more versatile and can do more things on the field, Smith is the better blocker though, I'll give him that. But to make it more detailed, Smith is more reliable in a short route play but Jackson is much more reliable in a deep route play with that KILLER speed.

Smith's numbers have become a lot less eye-popping in recent weeks. Jackson has made at least 1 highlight in every single game this season.

With the exception of the Tampa game.


Oakland?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> NFL Comparisons All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 4 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group