Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Draft Simulator Is BACK!
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> New York Jets
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
superbowlbound


Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 3149
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 4:22 am    Post subject: Draft Simulator Is BACK! Reply with quote

I did this one with trades, you can trade or not.
NFL DRAFT GAME 2015
YOUR TEAM: NEW YORK JETS

Your score is: 5331 (GRADE: A-)

Your Picks:
Round 1 Pick 9 (NYG): Jameis Winston, QB, Florida State (A)
Round 2 Pick 5: Jaelen Strong, WR, Arizona State (A)
Round 2 Pick 8 (NYG): Gerod Holliman, FS, Louisville (A)
Round 2 Pick 17 (S.D.): Todd Gurley, RB, Georgia (A)
Round 3 Pick 6: Markus Golden, DE, Missouri (A)
Round 3 Pick 10 (NYG): Arie Kouandjio, OG, Alabama (A)
Round 3 Pick 16 (S.D.): Cam Thomas, CB, Western Kentucky (A-)
Round 4 Pick 5: Antwan Goodley, WR, Baylor (B-)
Round 4 Pick 9 (NYG): Andy Gallik, C, Boston College (A)
Round 5 Pick 6: Ben Heeney, ILB, Kansas (A-)
Round 7 Pick 6: Blake Bell, TE, Oklahoma (C)

Your Future Picks:
2015 Round 1 Pick
2016 Round 1 Pick
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rich51


Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 1821
Location: WPB Fl via Jc NJ
PostPosted: Sun Jan 04, 2015 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It, and the one at Fanspeak, have been back for a while but imo are still missing a lot of prospects. Also their rating system is inconsistent. It is fun though
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pvsports9


Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 1535
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 12:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't have the upgraded version so I can't trade or get grades - but here's what I got

6: R1P6 DT LEONARD WILLIAMS USC
37: R2P5 RB MELVIN GORDON WISCONSIN
70: R3P6 OT ERECK FLOWERSMIAMI
101: R4P5 WR SAMMIE COATES AUBURN
134: R5P6 QB GARRETT GRAYSON COLORADO STATE
165: R6P5 DE HENRY ANDERSON STANFORD
198: R7P6 CB LADARIUS GUNTER - MIAMI

Notable: I passed on Winston at 6
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JetFanSince85


Joined: 27 Dec 2011
Posts: 669
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pvsports9 wrote:
I don't have the upgraded version so I can't trade or get grades - but here's what I got

6: R1P6 DT LEONARD WILLIAMS USC
37: R2P5 RB MELVIN GORDON WISCONSIN
70: R3P6 OT ERECK FLOWERSMIAMI
101: R4P5 WR SAMMIE COATES AUBURN
134: R5P6 QB GARRETT GRAYSON COLORADO STATE
165: R6P5 DE HENRY ANDERSON STANFORD
198: R7P6 CB LADARIUS GUNTER - MIAMI

Notable: I passed on Winston at 6


If we got got Gordon at 37, I would flip. Sammie Coats ? WOW Love this draft.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NewAge


Joined: 01 Sep 2014
Posts: 8630
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 12:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pvsports9 wrote:
I don't have the upgraded version so I can't trade or get grades - but here's what I got

6: R1P6 DT LEONARD WILLIAMS USC
37: R2P5 RB MELVIN GORDON WISCONSIN
70: R3P6 OT ERECK FLOWERSMIAMI
101: R4P5 WR SAMMIE COATES AUBURN
134: R5P6 QB GARRETT GRAYSON COLORADO STATE
165: R6P5 DE HENRY ANDERSON STANFORD
198: R7P6 CB LADARIUS GUNTER - MIAMI

Notable: I passed on Winston at 6

Why would we take Williams?
_________________
Frank Underwood wrote:
We're survivors.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rich51


Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 1821
Location: WPB Fl via Jc NJ
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

NewAge wrote:
Pvsports9 wrote:
I don't have the upgraded version so I can't trade or get grades - but here's what I got

6: R1P6 DT LEONARD WILLIAMS USC
37: R2P5 RB MELVIN GORDON WISCONSIN
70: R3P6 OT ERECK FLOWERSMIAMI
101: R4P5 WR SAMMIE COATES AUBURN
134: R5P6 QB GARRETT GRAYSON COLORADO STATE
165: R6P5 DE HENRY ANDERSON STANFORD
198: R7P6 CB LADARIUS GUNTER - MIAMI

Notable: I passed on Winston at 6

Why would we take Williams?


A tribute to Rex. Seriously he's probably the only top prospect we wouldn't take
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rich51


Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 1821
Location: WPB Fl via Jc NJ
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On fanspeak i keep alternating between Stanley and Cooper. In the second the best OT i can get is Sanbrailo or at WR DGB. On first pick i keep trading down to middle of first and getting Collins and again taking DGB in second along with a safety usually Smith or Holliman. Although sometime i can trade with Cleveland and get Collins and Parker in the first. That would be nice, imo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pvsports9


Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 1535
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rich51 wrote:
NewAge wrote:
Pvsports9 wrote:
I don't have the upgraded version so I can't trade or get grades - but here's what I got

6: R1P6 DT LEONARD WILLIAMS USC
37: R2P5 RB MELVIN GORDON WISCONSIN
70: R3P6 OT ERECK FLOWERSMIAMI
101: R4P5 WR SAMMIE COATES AUBURN
134: R5P6 QB GARRETT GRAYSON COLORADO STATE
165: R6P5 DE HENRY ANDERSON STANFORD
198: R7P6 CB LADARIUS GUNTER - MIAMI

Notable: I passed on Winston at 6

Why would we take Williams?


A tribute to Rex. Seriously he's probably the only top prospect we wouldn't take


I'm a firm believer in taking BPA - you don't pass on a player of his caliber if 1. he's clearly the best option and 2. can't trade down
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
barnaby8787


Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 7772
Location: Manhattan, NY
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pvsports9 wrote:
Rich51 wrote:
NewAge wrote:
Pvsports9 wrote:
I don't have the upgraded version so I can't trade or get grades - but here's what I got

6: R1P6 DT LEONARD WILLIAMS USC
37: R2P5 RB MELVIN GORDON WISCONSIN
70: R3P6 OT ERECK FLOWERSMIAMI
101: R4P5 WR SAMMIE COATES AUBURN
134: R5P6 QB GARRETT GRAYSON COLORADO STATE
165: R6P5 DE HENRY ANDERSON STANFORD
198: R7P6 CB LADARIUS GUNTER - MIAMI

Notable: I passed on Winston at 6

Why would we take Williams?


A tribute to Rex. Seriously he's probably the only top prospect we wouldn't take


I'm a firm believer in taking BPA - you don't pass on a player of his caliber if 1. he's clearly the best option and 2. can't trade down
Disagree. BPA yes, but it still needs to relate somewhat to positions of need. That's like the BPA being a QB and the Colts taking him.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pvsports9


Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 1535
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

barnaby8787 wrote:
Pvsports9 wrote:
Rich51 wrote:
NewAge wrote:
Pvsports9 wrote:
I don't have the upgraded version so I can't trade or get grades - but here's what I got

6: R1P6 DT LEONARD WILLIAMS USC
37: R2P5 RB MELVIN GORDON WISCONSIN
70: R3P6 OT ERECK FLOWERSMIAMI
101: R4P5 WR SAMMIE COATES AUBURN
134: R5P6 QB GARRETT GRAYSON COLORADO STATE
165: R6P5 DE HENRY ANDERSON STANFORD
198: R7P6 CB LADARIUS GUNTER - MIAMI

Notable: I passed on Winston at 6

Why would we take Williams?


A tribute to Rex. Seriously he's probably the only top prospect we wouldn't take


I'm a firm believer in taking BPA - you don't pass on a player of his caliber if 1. he's clearly the best option and 2. can't trade down
Disagree. BPA yes, but it still needs to relate somewhat to positions of need. That's like the BPA being a QB and the Colts taking him.


Do I really need to point out the obvious here with this one ^
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
barnaby8787


Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 7772
Location: Manhattan, NY
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pvsports9 wrote:
barnaby8787 wrote:
Pvsports9 wrote:
Rich51 wrote:
NewAge wrote:
Pvsports9 wrote:
I don't have the upgraded version so I can't trade or get grades - but here's what I got

6: R1P6 DT LEONARD WILLIAMS USC
37: R2P5 RB MELVIN GORDON WISCONSIN
70: R3P6 OT ERECK FLOWERSMIAMI
101: R4P5 WR SAMMIE COATES AUBURN
134: R5P6 QB GARRETT GRAYSON COLORADO STATE
165: R6P5 DE HENRY ANDERSON STANFORD
198: R7P6 CB LADARIUS GUNTER - MIAMI

Notable: I passed on Winston at 6

Why would we take Williams?


A tribute to Rex. Seriously he's probably the only top prospect we wouldn't take


I'm a firm believer in taking BPA - you don't pass on a player of his caliber if 1. he's clearly the best option and 2. can't trade down
Disagree. BPA yes, but it still needs to relate somewhat to positions of need. That's like the BPA being a QB and the Colts taking him.


Do I really need to point out the obvious here with this one ^
You clearly do because we have Wilk and Sheldon. No need unless we switch to a 4-3.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pvsports9


Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Posts: 1535
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Colts literally just did that with Manning and Luck.

You don't ever pass on a dominant talent just because he doesn't fit a need - that's how you end up with no depth and a crap roster.

I'd be very happy taking Williams in this scenario

You think the Rams figured they should pass on Donald just because they had quinn, brockers, langford, and long?

I'm not saying its ideal - I'm just saying it's smart
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
superbowlbound


Joined: 30 Dec 2008
Posts: 3149
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

barnaby8787 wrote:
Pvsports9 wrote:
Rich51 wrote:
NewAge wrote:
Pvsports9 wrote:
I don't have the upgraded version so I can't trade or get grades - but here's what I got

6: R1P6 DT LEONARD WILLIAMS USC
37: R2P5 RB MELVIN GORDON WISCONSIN
70: R3P6 OT ERECK FLOWERSMIAMI
101: R4P5 WR SAMMIE COATES AUBURN
134: R5P6 QB GARRETT GRAYSON COLORADO STATE
165: R6P5 DE HENRY ANDERSON STANFORD
198: R7P6 CB LADARIUS GUNTER - MIAMI

Notable: I passed on Winston at 6

Why would we take Williams?


A tribute to Rex. Seriously he's probably the only top prospect we wouldn't take


I'm a firm believer in taking BPA - you don't pass on a player of his caliber if 1. he's clearly the best option and 2. can't trade down
Disagree. BPA yes, but it still needs to relate somewhat to positions of need. That's like the BPA being a QB and the Colts taking him.


Rams took donald when they had no room for him on the d-line... That helped.

And I can name several teams that took a Qb as bpa when they already had a bonafide starter (Green Bay and Rodgers right off the top of my head)

With all that said... I don't think williams makes it to our pick anyway. Not when interior pass-rushung has become more and more important.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
barnaby8787


Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 7772
Location: Manhattan, NY
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pvsports9 wrote:
The Colts literally just did that with Manning and Luck.

You don't ever pass on a dominant talent just because he doesn't fit a need - that's how you end up with no depth and a crap roster.

I'd be very happy taking Williams in this scenario

You think the Rams figured they should pass on Donald just because they had quinn, brockers, langford, and long?

I'm not saying its ideal - I'm just saying it's smart
You mean when Manning had a potential career ending injury? Or when he was in his mid 30's? By the way, they released Peyton before they took Luck. Luck is 25, you would NEVER do that. Plus, Langford and Brockers are not elite while Wilk and Sheldon are.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
barnaby8787


Joined: 01 Jan 2006
Posts: 7772
Location: Manhattan, NY
PostPosted: Mon Jan 05, 2015 5:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

superbowlbound wrote:
barnaby8787 wrote:
Pvsports9 wrote:
Rich51 wrote:
NewAge wrote:
Pvsports9 wrote:
I don't have the upgraded version so I can't trade or get grades - but here's what I got

6: R1P6 DT LEONARD WILLIAMS USC
37: R2P5 RB MELVIN GORDON WISCONSIN
70: R3P6 OT ERECK FLOWERSMIAMI
101: R4P5 WR SAMMIE COATES AUBURN
134: R5P6 QB GARRETT GRAYSON COLORADO STATE
165: R6P5 DE HENRY ANDERSON STANFORD
198: R7P6 CB LADARIUS GUNTER - MIAMI

Notable: I passed on Winston at 6

Why would we take Williams?


A tribute to Rex. Seriously he's probably the only top prospect we wouldn't take


I'm a firm believer in taking BPA - you don't pass on a player of his caliber if 1. he's clearly the best option and 2. can't trade down
Disagree. BPA yes, but it still needs to relate somewhat to positions of need. That's like the BPA being a QB and the Colts taking him.


Rams took donald when they had no room for him on the d-line... That helped.

And I can name several teams that took a Qb as bpa when they already had a bonafide starter (Green Bay and Rodgers right off the top of my head)

With all that said... I don't think williams makes it to our pick anyway. Not when interior pass-rushung has become more and more important.
Just explained. You're talking about taking a QB when a team has a star QB in place who is aging. No DT's on St. Louis were elite. If so and the Donald pick was a shocker, nobody would have mocked him to them, which they did.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> New York Jets All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group