| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
skatebeanz 
Joined: 13 Apr 2009 Posts: 17459 Location: Jamison. on the Sweet-sig.
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:02 pm Post subject: BCS to do a "final four" |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | The announcement that the BCS decided on a four-team playoff is the easiest part of the decision. Over the next seven weeks, the leagues must decide when and where they will play the semifinal games -- Bowls? No bowls? -- and how to select the four participating teams. It will test the goodwill that came out of the meetings last week. It will test the schools’ allegiance to the bowls. College football always tries to strike a balance between tradition and revenue. This time, finding that balance couldn’t be more important. |
http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/tag/_/name/3-point-stance
They have work to do but they got a final four done. No thread on it yet? _________________
| detfan782004 wrote: | | If he [Ansah] doesn't exceed career sacks this year I'm calling it a bust, all 4.5 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kitsnow
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1340
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
So the pac gets screwed by 9 conference games and the upcoming big match ups.
While SEC plays 4 pansy's and tells tall tales about their great strength of schedule. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
buno67 
Joined: 15 Mar 2007 Posts: 23979 Location: Chubs for Chud
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kitsnow wrote: |
While SEC plays 4 pansy's and tells tall tales about their great strength of schedule. |
its been like that for awhile now _________________
XBL:buno67
PSN:mcolabuno |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
All IN 14-0!
Joined: 20 Apr 2011 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| buno67 wrote: | | kitsnow wrote: |
While SEC plays 4 pansy's and tells tall tales about their great strength of schedule. |
its been like that for awhile now |
This is laughable coming from an Oregon and Ohio St. fans. I'll trade Auburn's schedule( or almost any SEC team's) for either of those cakewalks any time. Wanna explain what's so daunting about either team's OOC schedule?
It's never to early to complain about the SEC...lol |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thrILL! 
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 16375 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kitsnow wrote: | So the pac gets screwed by 9 conference games and the upcoming big match ups.
While SEC plays 4 pansy's and tells tall tales about their great strength of schedule. |
You mean the PAC-12 where only 1 maybe 2 teams even play defense? _________________
Winter Style Records compilation free DL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skatebeanz 
Joined: 13 Apr 2009 Posts: 17459 Location: Jamison. on the Sweet-sig.
|
Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| thrILL! wrote: | | kitsnow wrote: | So the pac gets screwed by 9 conference games and the upcoming big match ups.
While SEC plays 4 pansy's and tells tall tales about their great strength of schedule. |
You mean the PAC-12 where only 1 maybe 2 teams even play defense? | LOL. Is it that they don't play defense or the fact that they have the best offenses? I mean really. Had Barkley came out four of the top seven QBs drafted would have been Pac12 players. Stanford had five players on offense alone drafted in the first forty picks. USC has two first round WRs right now. That doesn't include Oregon who somehow with little to no NFL talent is the Best offense there. So no wonder. I one can stop anyone. _________________
| detfan782004 wrote: | | If he [Ansah] doesn't exceed career sacks this year I'm calling it a bust, all 4.5 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Typical_Lions 
Joined: 08 Mar 2006 Posts: 1469 Location: Carpathia
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Texasmade
Joined: 05 Nov 2008 Posts: 6252 Location: DTX / ATX
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| kitsnow wrote: | So the pac gets screwed by 9 conference games and the upcoming big match ups.
While SEC plays 4 pansy's and tells tall tales about their great strength of schedule. | Lol _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thrILL! 
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 16375 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| skatebeanz wrote: | | thrILL! wrote: | | kitsnow wrote: | So the pac gets screwed by 9 conference games and the upcoming big match ups.
While SEC plays 4 pansy's and tells tall tales about their great strength of schedule. |
You mean the PAC-12 where only 1 maybe 2 teams even play defense? | LOL. Is it that they don't play defense or the fact that they have the best offenses? |
It's that they don't play defense. Not to mention their offense disappears against SEC teams (not named UT). _________________
Winter Style Records compilation free DL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nixa37
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 2961
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| buno67 wrote: | | kitsnow wrote: |
While SEC plays 4 pansy's and tells tall tales about their great strength of schedule. |
its been like that for awhile now |
And this is how you can spot fans that don't actually follow SEC football closely. Last season in OOC games SEC teams played Texas A&M, Penn State, Oregon, West Virginia, Clemson (x2), Georgia Tech, FSU, Boise State, BYU, etc.
This is of course leaving aside the incredibly aggressive bowl tie-ins against which the SEC seems to put up a winning record almost every year. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bigschmadt00 
 Joined: 17 Dec 2008 Posts: 10553 Location: Seeing what condition my condition is in
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 9:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I think the fact that the SEC plays themselves should be enough validation of their schedule, not to mention that the top teams there all play at least one OOC game that is against a top 50 or so team, if not two. _________________
^ryknowssd on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skatebeanz 
Joined: 13 Apr 2009 Posts: 17459 Location: Jamison. on the Sweet-sig.
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| thrILL! wrote: | | It's that they don't play defense. Not to mention their offense disappears against SEC teams (not named UT). | Ah. That is why a QB who isn't draftable puts up 400 yards of passing in the biggest game of the year. Gotcha. In fact that QB out duled the Godly "SEC" Heisman winner. Next example please.
Oregon and WV put up more yards on LSU than any other team during the regular season. You know those simplistic offenses... Next example please. _________________
| detfan782004 wrote: | | If he [Ansah] doesn't exceed career sacks this year I'm calling it a bust, all 4.5 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Remixxxxxxx 
Joined: 06 Mar 2009 Posts: 9917 Location: E808 on the avi; P90 on the sig
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Quote: | | Oregon and WV put up more yards on LSU than any other team during the regular season. You know those simplistic offenses... Next example please. |
It's a good thing both WVU and Oregon beat LSU. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
skatebeanz 
Joined: 13 Apr 2009 Posts: 17459 Location: Jamison. on the Sweet-sig.
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 10:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Remixxxxxxx wrote: | | Quote: | | Oregon and WV put up more yards on LSU than any other team during the regular season. You know those simplistic offenses... Next example please. |
It's a good thing both WVU and Oregon beat LSU. | That has what to do with offenses? _________________
| detfan782004 wrote: | | If he [Ansah] doesn't exceed career sacks this year I'm calling it a bust, all 4.5 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
All IN 14-0!
Joined: 20 Apr 2011 Posts: 527
|
Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| skatebeanz wrote: | | thrILL! wrote: | | It's that they don't play defense. Not to mention their offense disappears against SEC teams (not named UT). | Ah. That is why a QB who isn't draftable puts up 400 yards of passing in the biggest game of the year. Gotcha. In fact that QB out duled the Godly "SEC" Heisman winner. Next example please.
Oregon and WV put up more yards on LSU than any other team during the regular season. You know those simplistic offenses... Next example please. |
Wow....Nice "cherry-picking" of one stat, from one game without giving any context to it. Let's look at Oregon against quality OOC opponents since 2009 to give a better example.
2009 Oregon season averages 37.7 PPG, 424 Total/YPG, 236 Rush/YPG
Against Boise: 8 points, 152 Total, 31 Rush
Against Ohio St: 17 points, 260 Total, 179 Rush
2010 Oregon season averages: 49.3 PPG, 537 Total/YPG, 303 rush/YPG
Against Auburn: 19 points, 449 Total, 75 Rush
2011 Oregon season averages: 46 PPG, 515 Total/YPG, 295 Rush/YPG
Against LSU: 27 points, 335 Total, 95 Rush.
Against Wisconsin: 45 points, 621 total, 345 rush
As anyone can easily see, Oregon's offensive output drops drastically when not facing conference opponents. Just like AU's coaches stated many times during practices leading up to the BCSNG, Don't let them run, and the mistakes will come. Coach Chizik didn't care if Oregon threw for 500 yds, as long as they couldn't run effectively. Same blueprint LSU, Boise, and OSU used.
That's exactly why your example is so flawed. And AU's defense was far from even "good" that year. In two drafts since, Only 2 players were selected. Nick Fairley and Zach Clayton(7th rnd). Far from a typically talented SEC defense. AU still exceeded their season avgs. on offense for total yards, and I fail to see how Thomas out-dueled Cam just because he threw for more yards. Not that it matters. Points win games, not yards.
Is this a good enough "example"? Or should I pick one stat from one game and focus on that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|