| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
1King
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 24532
Location: BeastM0de23RB on the sig.
|
 Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:35 pm Post subject: Big Ten/Pac-12 Schedule agreement CANCELLED |
 |
|
|
http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/53126/big-ten-pac-12-pact-dissolves-fans-lose
| Quote: | | The two leagues announced Friday that their pact, which initially called for 12 football games per year, has been called off. The reason: at least four Pac-12 schools were unwilling to agree to mandatory scheduling, ESPN.com has learned. |
Damn you unnamed Pac-12 schools.
_________________
| candyman93 wrote: | | 1king is showing why he's awesome |
| CWood21 wrote: | | Congrats to 1King, the winner of the inaugural NBA Trade Tournament. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RuskieTitan
Joined: 29 Apr 2007
Posts: 34371
Location: Front lines of Titania
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Probably either the better schools afraid of getting losses, or a lesser school afraid of more losses.
_________________
^^ryknowssd^^
Supporter of the Death Penalty in CFB
FF Hunger Games I Winner |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RandyMossIsBoss
Joined: 01 Jun 2012
Posts: 8650
Location: Peppers90 on the sig, Kiltman on the avy
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Figures, they would be no match for the Big 10 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
plan9misfit
Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Posts: 18099
Location: RIP: B2TB, T14, & S.A. We miss you.
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Figures, they would be no match for the Big 10 |
USC and Oregon would disagree.
_________________
Co-Founder: DCRA - No McQuistan, No Super Bowl
| The_Slamman wrote: | | It's like we are in a win now mentality with lose now personnel. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
McNabbMcFadden
Joined: 25 Feb 2007
Posts: 29380
Location: State College, PA
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| plan9misfit wrote: | | RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Figures, they would be no match for the Big 10 |
USC and Oregon would disagree. |
Other than that? 
_________________
| LOLKevinKolb wrote: | | oland11 wrote: | | I call Red or Blue ranger. |
Pink it is |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ttitansfan4life
Joined: 30 Dec 2009
Posts: 18642
Location: Delaware
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| McNabbMcFadden wrote: | | plan9misfit wrote: | | RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Figures, they would be no match for the Big 10 |
USC and Oregon would disagree. |
Other than that? |
Stanford is still going to be good. Washington will be good
_________________
Props to "Joe is the Best" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nugpimpen
Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 12533
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ttitansfan4life wrote: | | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | | plan9misfit wrote: | | RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Figures, they would be no match for the Big 10 |
USC and Oregon would disagree. |
Other than that? |
Stanford is still going to be good. Washington will be good |
Debatable
_________________
| hornbybrown wrote: | | We also have the highest amount per capita of Jedi in New Zealand. I'm one. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nugpimpen
Joined: 18 Feb 2006
Posts: 12533
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 1:55 pm Post subject: Re: Big Ten/Pac-12 Schedule agreement CANCELLED |
|
|
|
| 1King wrote: | http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/53126/big-ten-pac-12-pact-dissolves-fans-lose
| Quote: | | The two leagues announced Friday that their pact, which initially called for 12 football games per year, has been called off. The reason: at least four Pac-12 schools were unwilling to agree to mandatory scheduling, ESPN.com has learned. |
Damn you unnamed Pac-12 schools. |
They fear us.
OMG i just used "us" while quoting you!   
It's like when all nations come together in Independence Day. lol
_________________
| hornbybrown wrote: | | We also have the highest amount per capita of Jedi in New Zealand. I'm one. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eksynyt
Joined: 09 Jul 2008
Posts: 5871
Location: Oregon
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Figures, they would be no match for the Big 10 |
Half of our teams already take an extra loss. We need to go back to 8 conference games before we do this scheduling agreement.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Eksynyt
Joined: 09 Jul 2008
Posts: 5871
Location: Oregon
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ttitansfan4life wrote: | | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | | plan9misfit wrote: | | RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Figures, they would be no match for the Big 10 |
USC and Oregon would disagree. |
Other than that? |
Stanford is still going to be good. Washington will be good |
Washington will start the season 2-4 or 1-5. Their schedule is brutal. They're not good yet.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bo_Spice
Joined: 17 May 2009
Posts: 7076
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Figures, they would be no match for the Big 10 |
USC vs. Big Ten
2011: vs. Minnesota 19-17 W
2010: @ Minnesota 32-21 W
2009: @ #8 Ohio State 18-15 W
2008: vs. #5 Ohio State 35-3 W
vs. #8 Penn State 38-24 W
2007: vs. Illinois 49-17 W
2006: vs. Michigan 32-18 W
2003: vs. Michigan 28-14 W
2002: vs. Iowa 38-17 W
Because its not like USC is 9-0 vs. the Big Ten over the past decade or anything... Or that their average margin of victory in those games is 16 points either...
Big Ten >>>
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
1King
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 24532
Location: BeastM0de23RB on the sig.
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ttitansfan4life wrote: | | McNabbMcFadden wrote: | | plan9misfit wrote: | | RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Figures, they would be no match for the Big 10 |
USC and Oregon would disagree. |
Other than that? |
Stanford is still going to be good. Washington will be good |
Since when is Washington good?
Sure they appear to be on the rise now, but acting like they will be good then is presumptuous, they haven't even had a good year yet.
Internet scuttlebutt (I know, I know, probably completely unreliable) suggests USC may have been one of the teams that didn't want it. Allegedly didn't want 9 conference games + ND + Big Ten team on the schedule.
_________________
| candyman93 wrote: | | 1king is showing why he's awesome |
| CWood21 wrote: | | Congrats to 1King, the winner of the inaugural NBA Trade Tournament. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fretgod99
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 17901
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Well that's too bad. Could have been fun.
Nebraska just did their home and home with Washington. Have UCLA the next two years. Would have been nice to add some more big name schools down the road. We have Miami and Tennessee in a few years, but I always love these big out-of-conference match-ups. Oregon could have been fun. Wouldn't have surprised me to see Colorado, considering the previous rivalry.
_________________
| MrDrew wrote: | | Can somebody give me a good reason there's not a giant statue to fret somewhere? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fretgod99
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 17901
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bo_Spice wrote: | | RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Figures, they would be no match for the Big 10 |
USC vs. Big Ten
2011: vs. Minnesota 19-17 W
2010: @ Minnesota 32-21 W
2009: @ #8 Ohio State 18-15 W
2008: vs. #5 Ohio State 35-3 W
vs. #8 Penn State 38-24 W
2007: vs. Illinois 49-17 W
2006: vs. Michigan 32-18 W
2003: vs. Michigan 28-14 W
2002: vs. Iowa 38-17 W
Because its not like USC is 9-0 vs. the Big Ten over the past decade or anything... Or that their average margin of victory in those games is 16 points either...
Big Ten >>> |
They played Nebraska a couple of times a few years again when we were still in the Big XII. But, to be fair, that was when Bill Callahan was our coach, so those games really shouldn't count.
_________________
| MrDrew wrote: | | Can somebody give me a good reason there's not a giant statue to fret somewhere? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
1King
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Posts: 24532
Location: BeastM0de23RB on the sig.
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Bo_Spice wrote: | | RandyMossIsBoss wrote: | | Figures, they would be no match for the Big 10 |
USC vs. Big Ten
2011: vs. Minnesota 19-17 W
2010: @ Minnesota 32-21 W
2009: @ #8 Ohio State 18-15 W
2008: vs. #5 Ohio State 35-3 W
vs. #8 Penn State 38-24 W
2007: vs. Illinois 49-17 W
2006: vs. Michigan 32-18 W
2003: vs. Michigan 28-14 W
2002: vs. Iowa 38-17 W
Because its not like USC is 9-0 vs. the Big Ten over the past decade or anything... Or that their average margin of victory in those games is 16 points either...
Big Ten >>> |
Anyone else find this funny?
USC does very well against good Michigan, OSU, PSU teams and even good Illinois and Iowa teams, but struggles against crappy Minnesota teams.
_________________
| candyman93 wrote: | | 1king is showing why he's awesome |
| CWood21 wrote: | | Congrats to 1King, the winner of the inaugural NBA Trade Tournament. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
