| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Acgott
Joined: 14 Jan 2007 Posts: 5524 Location: USA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
J-ALL-DAY 
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 15536
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Yeah, I would think this means Carr is gone while they keep Bowe. Routt is in a perfect spot where he will get to play physical. Needs to tone down the aggressiveness, but the Chiefs will still have one of the best duos in the game. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SilverNBlackFan 
Joined: 15 Oct 2007 Posts: 5574 Location: R.I.P Al Davis 1929-2011
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Routt is nowhere near as good as the contract we gave him last year, but he's still a good player. I think he'll do good in Romeo Crennel's defense.
Imagine if the Chiefs find a way to resign Brandon Carr. That would be the best CB trio in the league. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Rob
Joined: 24 Sep 2011 Posts: 1078 Location: Long Beach, Ca
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Nice pick up for KC at the pay rate Routt is worth, just as long as they don't plan on playing him in then slot or in zone.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Frank Costello 
Joined: 01 Mar 2009 Posts: 8815 Location: in 2009, Vikings>Saints
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Solid signing. Now Carr can come be in the man in Minnesota. _________________ Welcome to Minnesota, Greg Jennings.
President of the Sammy Watkins fan club. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JaguarCrazy2832 
Joined: 28 Jun 2008 Posts: 73448
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
3yrs 20 million seems like an awful lot for him _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mikek163 
Joined: 24 Nov 2008 Posts: 4679
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Everyone automatically assumes the CHIEFS didn't want Carr. What if it's the other way around and this was the perfect opportunity for the Chiefs to fill the void? For all we know Carr wanted out.
In my personal opinion / belief we are going to re sign Carr as well. pioli made it VERY well known that the league is changing and then selected Eric Berry. Having 4 cover corners should be a staple in today's defense. (I'm including arenas). _________________
Knock knock. Who's there? The guy that finished second! The guy that finished second who? Exactly. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
broncos67 
Joined: 28 Dec 2006 Posts: 18066 Location: Capitol Cit-ay
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't think this means KC just lets go of Carr. I personally believe they'll franchise him, but that's just me. _________________
Thanks, Tzimisce |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Frank Costello 
Joined: 01 Mar 2009 Posts: 8815 Location: in 2009, Vikings>Saints
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Money talks. If someone will pay Carr a lot more then KC, he will walk. Black and white.
I used to think differently, and that players still have some allegiance to their respective team. But it's not that way anymore and Carr is a hot target. KC will have to pay him like they would Flowers IMO.
Why be a number 2, when you can be paid more and be a number 1 somewhere else? _________________ Welcome to Minnesota, Greg Jennings.
President of the Sammy Watkins fan club. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Rob
Joined: 24 Sep 2011 Posts: 1078 Location: Long Beach, Ca
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mikek163 wrote: | Everyone automatically assumes the CHIEFS didn't want Carr. What if it's the other way around and this was the perfect opportunity for the Chiefs to fill the void? For all we know Carr wanted out.
In my personal opinion / belief we are going to re sign Carr as well. pioli made it VERY well known that the league is changing and then selected Eric Berry. Having 4 cover corners should be a staple in today's defense. (I'm including arenas). |
I still think KC makes a run for Carr, especially with all that cap space. Way too early to have given up on BC. It's also a nice insurance policy if they miss out on Carr.
Like you said today's NFL calls for more DBs...But damn that will be one expensive secondary... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Big Rob
Joined: 24 Sep 2011 Posts: 1078 Location: Long Beach, Ca
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| broncos67 wrote: | | I don't think this means KC just lets go of Carr. I personally believe they'll franchise him, but that's just me. |
Especially if they sign Bowe long term...
Last edited by Big Rob on Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
big_palooka 
Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 19036 Location: ATL
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
So wait, they are going to pay starting CB money to 2 CBs is what some are thinking?
And they what? Routt goes inside where he's hot garbage?
Can't see it. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RaiderFanSD
Joined: 14 Jun 2009 Posts: 859
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Chiefs got worse IMO, but they were smart about it if they were never going to re-sign Carr anyway
John Clayton@ClaytonESPNReply
With more than $52 million of contracts tied up in CBs Brandon Flowers and Stanford Routt, expect KC to let Brandon Carr walk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CharlieKelly 
Joined: 26 Jan 2012 Posts: 109
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Pretty much guarantees the Chiefs playing mostly Man/Bump-and-Run(which is what we're more suited for) I pray at least.
| Big_Palooka wrote: | | And they what? Routt goes inside where he's hot garbage? |
Why does it have to be Routt that is moved inside? Why not Flowers or Carr?
I think Flowers could be Woodson-esque in the slot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dante9876 
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 17517
|
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CharlieKelly wrote: | Pretty much guarantees the Chiefs playing mostly Man/Bump-and-Run(which is what we're more suited for) I pray at least.
| Big_Palooka wrote: | | And they what? Routt goes inside where he's hot garbage? |
Why does it have to be Routt that is moved inside? Why not Flowers or Carr?
I think Flowers could be Woodson-esque in the slot. |
Flowers has problems with guys with speed. Why would you want him in the slot? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|