| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Wolfhunt
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 813
|
 Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 3:06 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| MaddHatter wrote: | Brownies should realize that the Rams had a franchise QB for sale and you have a WR or CB for sale. That's why you only picked up a 3rd to move down 3 spots and they broke the bank. Even if Justin was a Megatron type prospect you're not cleaning house.
As for Tannehill, he will start day 1 over Colt, is a WCO QB, Beckett loves him, and this is the lowest spot you can get him as Miami and Seattle would both take him as well. |
You need to walk away from the funny tobacco man. A guy who has only played 19 games at QB against a horrible division and you say he would start over Colt.
We will not take him. I wouldn't even draft him with a 3rd round pick. The guy too much to learn and just too erratic to be considered that high. This team has big needs that need addressed and this dismal draft just sets us back another starter.
_________________
| ACDC_Rocks024 wrote: | | when you are rebuilding a franchise, the first thing you start with isn't O lineman |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MaddHatter
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 41471
Location: Dallas, TX
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Guess we'll find out soon enough
_________________
Ware Stat Tracker: 27 Pressures, 9 Hits, 10 sacks, 4 FF, 7 TFL (thru 8 games) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The LBC
Joined: 12 Jan 2008
Posts: 15513
Location: Long Beach, CA
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
San Diego would draft Perry over Ingram. One we've actually shown interest to and have ties to (Joe Barry, our LB coach, was Perry's LB coach at USC); the other we haven't/don't.
_________________
| The Cryptkeeper wrote: | | He's Long, he's strong, and down to get the hittin' on. Russell got whacked. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaddHatter
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 41471
Location: Dallas, TX
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Updated with some suggested changes
_________________
Ware Stat Tracker: 27 Pressures, 9 Hits, 10 sacks, 4 FF, 7 TFL (thru 8 games) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DEE RAWL
Joined: 02 Oct 2007
Posts: 2852
Location: Southern California
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good job for the rams.
Im curious what youd put for round 2
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BrownsDog23
Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 271
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Still the same crap for the Browns. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaddHatter
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 41471
Location: Dallas, TX
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BrownsDog23 wrote: | | Still the same crap for the Browns. |
Let me know when you sign Flynn - till then its a QB league and you crapped the bed for RGIII so now you have to deal with it. But I did tack on an extra value pick since slight profit wasn't enough apparently
_________________
Ware Stat Tracker: 27 Pressures, 9 Hits, 10 sacks, 4 FF, 7 TFL (thru 8 games) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ctpatsfan77
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 2377
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 2:33 am Post subject: Re: MaddHatter's Annual Mock Draft - 2.0 |
|
|
|
| MaddHatter wrote: | 31. New England - David Wilson
32. New York – Coby Fleener |
I'd rather the Pats took Fleener. In any case, there will be a lot of broken TVs in New England if the Pats take a RB in the first.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mastercheddaar
Joined: 14 Dec 2006
Posts: 4268
Location: Northeast Ohio.. Obviously
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 8:53 am Post subject: hmmm |
|
|
|
I want nothing to do with tannehill. I like the idea of a trade back but not for him. Berkley next year if Colt fails. Also without any real upgrades to the offense or defense we'll be doomed to another 6-10 to 4-12 season.
that is all
Mastercheddaar
_________________
For those that don't know:
NFL - AFC Browns, NFC Eagles
Basket Ball - Cavs
Baseball - Indians/Yankees.
CF - Ohio State and Wake Forest
Women - Brunettes with Blue eyes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaddHatter
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 41471
Location: Dallas, TX
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 8:53 am Post subject: Re: MaddHatter's Annual Mock Draft - 2.0 |
|
|
|
| ctpatsfan77 wrote: | | MaddHatter wrote: | 31. New England - David Wilson
32. New York – Coby Fleener |
I'd rather the Pats took Fleener. In any case, there will be a lot of broken TVs in New England if the Pats take a RB in the first. |
You have the best TE duo in the NFL and you want to waste a 1st on another who would be a backup the next 5yrs until someone was sent packing or traded?
_________________
Ware Stat Tracker: 27 Pressures, 9 Hits, 10 sacks, 4 FF, 7 TFL (thru 8 games) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Its A Sabotage
Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 28007
Location: Do. Your. Job.
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MaddHatter wrote: | | Updated with some suggested changes |
Eh, again, either trade up for Claiborne or stay at 7 and take Michael Floyd.
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | Sabo is the best poster on FF |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MaddHatter
Joined: 29 Nov 2006
Posts: 41471
Location: Dallas, TX
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Its A Sabotage wrote: | | MaddHatter wrote: | | Updated with some suggested changes |
Eh, again, either trade up for Claiborne or stay at 7 and take Michael Floyd. |
I agree
_________________
Ware Stat Tracker: 27 Pressures, 9 Hits, 10 sacks, 4 FF, 7 TFL (thru 8 games) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BrownsDog23
Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 271
Location: United States
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| MaddHatter wrote: | | BrownsDog23 wrote: | | Still the same crap for the Browns. |
Let me know when you sign Flynn - till then its a QB league and you crapped the bed for RGIII so now you have to deal with it. But I did tack on an extra value pick since slight profit wasn't enough apparently |
The value of the trade is not the problem, the selection there is. Just because the Browns didn't land RG3 doesn't mean they have to make a MASSIVE reach for a project QB with some upside. Your analyses on why the Brown will pick Tannehill is shallow, lacking in detail, and inaccurate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pigsooie5
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3058
Location: LOBO NATION, New Mexico
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
What's your reasoning for a DT to Chicago? Makes little to no sense at all. DT isn't considered a top 5 need by anyone. Unless you think he has the potential at DE in a 4-3 I really don't understand this one..
_________________
| WindyCity wrote: | | I was actually driving Nick Fairley and Mikel Leshoure to their NA meetings when Suh side swipped our car and threatened us. |
IN EMERY, WE TRUST |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tdfast
Joined: 10 Feb 2005
Posts: 11191
Location: Edmonton
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Even before free agency I don't see Tampa taking a WR over Richardson. Now it's a lock. I still think the Browns will ruin it for us and take Richardson, but if they don't, or if there's a trade, we'll take him.
If Richardson is there at #5, Tampa takes him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
