| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Chrissooner49er
Joined: 03 Feb 2005
Posts: 3641
Location: Tulsa, OK
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:51 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| 48 1/2ers wrote: | | We could probably wait till the next round for robinson. But I think just for depth purposes I would be opposed for going after Bruflict. He could probably add alot on special teams and get his head on straight from sitting behind the best there is. Larry Grant is likely gone after next year too remember. |
I don't want Burfict anywhere near the 9ers! There is a reason he has had no visits at all... 
_________________
fa·nat·ic (f-ntk)
A person marked or motivated by an extreme, unreasoning enthusiasm, as for a cause.
Fleener: 21 Recs 222yds 86 YAC Walker: 7 Recs 89yds 13YAC |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
big9erfan
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10715
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
No on burfict for me too.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oldman9er
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 36646
Location: New Orleans
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Chrissooner49er wrote: |
I don't want Burfict anywhere near the 9ers! There is a reason he has had no visits at all... |
I feel this way also.
_________________
___  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big9erfan
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10715
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
How about Gino Gradkowski? Seems to be getting attention as a later round pick in a lot of team forums and we could use a guy to compete at C.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oldman9er
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 36646
Location: New Orleans
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| big9erfan wrote: | | How about Gino Gradkowski? Seems to be getting attention as a later round pick in a lot of team forums and we could use a guy to compete at C. |
Beeler and Kilgore.. not enough?
_________________
___ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big9erfan
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10715
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| oldman9er wrote: | | big9erfan wrote: | | How about Gino Gradkowski? Seems to be getting attention as a later round pick in a lot of team forums and we could use a guy to compete at C. |
Beeler and Kilgore.. not enough? |
That's two guys with zero minutes of playing time at the C position in the NFL. And Kilgore's probably got zero in his entire career, and is likely pencilled in as a G candidate anyway. I might argue that with a so-so and rapidly aging starter and two backups with zero time at C in the NFL this might just be the weakest position left on the team at this point in this particular mock.
I actually don't know anything about Gradkowski other than what I've read. So if he's not worth a lower round pick then fine. But I wouldn't pass on him because I thought we are "set" at C.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oldman9er
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 36646
Location: New Orleans
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| big9erfan wrote: | | oldman9er wrote: | | big9erfan wrote: | | How about Gino Gradkowski? Seems to be getting attention as a later round pick in a lot of team forums and we could use a guy to compete at C. |
Beeler and Kilgore.. not enough? |
That's two guys with zero minutes of playing time at the C position in the NFL. And Kilgore's probably got zero in his entire career, and is likely pencilled in as a G candidate anyway. I might argue that with a so-so and rapidly aging starter and two backups with zero time at C in the NFL this might just be the weakest position left on the team at this point in this particular mock.
I actually don't know anything about Gradkowski other than what I've read. So if he's not worth a lower round pick then fine. But I wouldn't pass on him because I thought we are "set" at C. |
Wow. Well, now who wants to argue with that attitude? 
_________________
___ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big9erfan
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10715
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| oldman9er wrote: | | big9erfan wrote: | | oldman9er wrote: | | big9erfan wrote: | | How about Gino Gradkowski? Seems to be getting attention as a later round pick in a lot of team forums and we could use a guy to compete at C. |
Beeler and Kilgore.. not enough? |
That's two guys with zero minutes of playing time at the C position in the NFL. And Kilgore's probably got zero in his entire career, and is likely pencilled in as a G candidate anyway. I might argue that with a so-so and rapidly aging starter and two backups with zero time at C in the NFL this might just be the weakest position left on the team at this point in this particular mock.
I actually don't know anything about Gradkowski other than what I've read. So if he's not worth a lower round pick then fine. But I wouldn't pass on him because I thought we are "set" at C. |
Wow. Well, now who wants to argue with that attitude? |
You asked. I answered. It appeared you believed we are "set" at C. I could have said "I don't agree", or I could have expounded a bit on why. When I read people's opinions I prefer they explain them rather just offer them. So I generally reply that way myself. Would you prefer an opinion with no explanation?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rudyZ
Joined: 12 Mar 2007
Posts: 11398
Location: Québec
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| big9erfan wrote: | | That's two guys with zero minutes of playing time at the C position in the NFL. |
And you suggest another guy with zero minute of playing time at the C position in the NFL would be better...
At least Kilgore and Beeler know the staff, the playbook and have one year of professional conditioning under their belt.
_________________
RudyZ's Power Rankings Power Ranking
1) RudyZ's Power Rankings Power Ranking
2) y2's pie Power Rankings (3.1416 rules!)
3) N4L's Poster Power Rankings |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big9erfan
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10715
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| rudyZ wrote: | | big9erfan wrote: | | That's two guys with zero minutes of playing time at the C position in the NFL. |
And you suggest another guy with zero minute of playing time at the C position in the NFL would be better...
At least Kilgore and Beeler know the staff, the playbook and have one year of professional conditioning under their belt. |
Neither has Andrew Luck. But people seem pretty eager to draft him. I'm really not sure what your point is. It seems to follow from it that no one should draft anyone because nobody in the draft has ever played in the NFL. In fact, after everyone follows through on that notion and drafts no one, I'd like to use our 5th pick on Luck.
You've criticized our starting C and suggested we use our first pick on our center. Now you seem to want to argue with my criticising our completely untried backup and using a 5th or 6th on a potential replacement? YOu've got me totally stumped here.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oldman9er
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 36646
Location: New Orleans
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Maybe just take it to PMs, huh? No one wants to read this crap here.
_________________
___ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
adamq
Joined: 18 Jan 2007
Posts: 7709
Location: Missouri
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Jacquies Smith (OLB Mizzou) is one of my guys this year, if he makes it to our pick he's who I want.
_________________
-kiltman
| Uncle Buck wrote: | | I'd rather have Tebow than any other QB in the NFL besides Rodgers, and I may even take him over Rodgers due to the difference in age. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oldman9er
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 36646
Location: New Orleans
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| adamq wrote: | | Jacquies Smith (OLB Mizzou) is one of my guys this year, if he makes it to our pick he's who I want. |
I'd have zero problems with another Mizzu Smith. 
_________________
___ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
big9erfan
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10715
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 19, 2012 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| oldman9er wrote: | | Maybe just take it to PMs, huh? No one wants to read this crap here. |
Just curious, what exactly is this supposed to mean?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
oldman9er
Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 36646
Location: New Orleans
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| big9erfan wrote: | | oldman9er wrote: | | Maybe just take it to PMs, huh? No one wants to read this crap here. |
Just curious, what exactly is this supposed to mean? |
It means we are now moving on from that discussion. List who you want and we go with majority vote.. simple as that.
_________________
___ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
