Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Miller: Bears should sign Owens Terrell Owens
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Chicago Bears
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ak06max


Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Posts: 1202
Location: Chicago
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 8:52 pm    Post subject: Miller: Bears should sign Owens Terrell Owens Reply with quote

http://www.csnchicago.com/football-chicago-bears/bears-talk/TO-to-the-Bears-Not-as-crazy-as-you-woul?blockID=685878&feedID=10330




No thanks just a perspective I found interesting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CBears019


Joined: 03 Aug 2008
Posts: 14773
Location: Iowa City, IA
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lol people have been saying this forever. We should also pick up McNabb since he's still a FA. Is Torry Holt still in shape? How about Matt Jones?


I get that since we have Marshall Owens wouldn't be relied on, but that's where the problem lies. He wouldn't be the #1 getting all the receptions and would throw a hissy fit. And we all know that Marshall isn't a timid little boy, he'll talk/fight back which would cause a horrible situation for the locker room.


That's a negative, ghost rider.
_________________
Martellus Bennet highlight video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lP8fHN53t0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raq11


Joined: 24 Feb 2011
Posts: 671
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CBears019 wrote:
Lol people have been saying this forever. We should also pick up McNabb since he's still a FA. Is Torry Holt still in shape? How about Matt Jones?


I get that since we have Marshall Owens wouldn't be relied on, but that's where the problem lies. He wouldn't be the #1 getting all the receptions and would throw a hissy fit. And we all know that Marshall isn't a timid little boy, he'll talk/fight back which would cause a horrible situation for the locker room.


That's a negative, ghost rider.


Warren Sapp is currently looking for work as well!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ChicagoAl


Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 7067
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CBears019 wrote:
Lol people have been saying this forever. We should also pick up McNabb since he's still a FA. Is Torry Holt still in shape? How about Matt Jones?


I get that since we have Marshall Owens wouldn't be relied on, but that's where the problem lies. He wouldn't be the #1 getting all the receptions and would throw a hissy fit. And we all know that Marshall isn't a timid little boy, he'll talk/fight back which would cause a horrible situation for the locker room.


That's a negative, ghost rider.
I'm not really afraid that Owens will be a negative. But not real interested either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IronMike84


Joined: 17 Jun 2009
Posts: 5918
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I heard Miller talking about this on Sirius last week, like he mentions in his article.

In retrospect, this would have been a good idea three or four years ago. Of course, I was totally against the idea at the time...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AZBearsFan


Moderator
Joined: 04 Feb 2006
Posts: 8907
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ChicagoAl wrote:
CBears019 wrote:
Lol people have been saying this forever. We should also pick up McNabb since he's still a FA. Is Torry Holt still in shape? How about Matt Jones?


I get that since we have Marshall Owens wouldn't be relied on, but that's where the problem lies. He wouldn't be the #1 getting all the receptions and would throw a hissy fit. And we all know that Marshall isn't a timid little boy, he'll talk/fight back which would cause a horrible situation for the locker room.


That's a negative, ghost rider.
I'm not really afraid that Owens will be a negative. But not real interested either.

Agreed 100%.
_________________

GRRLacher wrote:
I told you guys AZ was awesome...he in fact makes triple the pay I get for moderating here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ConVict90


Joined: 20 Sep 2009
Posts: 1889
Location: San Diego
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is this some kind of sick late April fools joke?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SLCbear


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 453
Location: CELTICSbasketball
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Id be just fine giving him a shot at the league min ! If healthy, he could easily put us over the top and give us more draft flexibility

....if not oh well, pretty simple move
talk about a zero, no risk/very high reward potential move..

absolute no-brainer if he's healthy IMO
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GRRLacher


Moderator
Most Valuable Poster (2nd Ballot)
FF Fanatic
Joined: 07 Mar 2005
Posts: 20640
Location: Maryland
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll take the zero, but thanks anyways lol. No interest in him at all.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SLCbear


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 453
Location: CELTICSbasketball
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe in TO and wouldnt be surprised at all if we brought him in.

He's only had great production everywhere he has played.....so why not give him a chance to play with Jay and along side Marshall

It costs us NOTHING to try it out, but lets say he beasts like he has everywhere he has ever played......and gives us 70-80 catches

If he's a problem at all, cut his a$$
Im not some TO fan hoping to see him a Bears uniform or anything, I just know the guy can play/still play if he's healthy...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SLCbear


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 453
Location: CELTICSbasketball
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 3:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

and we could really use the band-aid at the position to focus on a couple other needs at least until we know how every thing will go with Knoxs health and impending free-agency..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IronMike84


Joined: 17 Jun 2009
Posts: 5918
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've never understood why people look at aging superstars like TO as if they're still in their prime. Same thing with Marvin Harrison a few years back, LTII, etc.

I don't care that they're going to make the Hall of Fame. By 35 and over, they're rarely (if ever) an asset.

TO is 38, NOT 22. It doesn't matter who he USED to be, only what he is now, and what he is now isn't a worthwhile investment.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SLCbear


Joined: 13 Mar 2007
Posts: 453
Location: CELTICSbasketball
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 4:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IronMike84 wrote:
I've never understood why people look at aging superstars like TO as if they're still in their prime. Same thing with Marvin Harrison a few years back, LTII, etc.

I don't care that they're going to make the Hall of Fame. By 35 and over, they're rarely (if ever) an asset.

TO is 38, NOT 22. It doesn't matter who he USED to be, only what he is now, and what he is now isn't a worthwhile investment.


The last time he was given the opportunity to play in the NFL, he was 17 yds shy of 1000....no one thinks he'll be what he "USED" to be (I wouldnt even want him if he was what he used to be....because then he would be bringing the circus to town with him lol), but it's a very real possibility, since the league has turned it's back on him, that he'll come in, shutup, and play hard........he's fully capable of giving us 70+ catches with a QB like Jay and a running mate like Marshall to feed off of....

and if this minimal investment doesn't pan out so what !! Cut him


......this is what Im suggesting
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IronMike84


Joined: 17 Jun 2009
Posts: 5918
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 12:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SLCbear wrote:
IronMike84 wrote:
I've never understood why people look at aging superstars like TO as if they're still in their prime. Same thing with Marvin Harrison a few years back, LTII, etc.

I don't care that they're going to make the Hall of Fame. By 35 and over, they're rarely (if ever) an asset.

TO is 38, NOT 22. It doesn't matter who he USED to be, only what he is now, and what he is now isn't a worthwhile investment.


The last time he was given the opportunity to play in the NFL, he was 17 yds shy of 1000....no one thinks he'll be what he "USED" to be (I wouldnt even want him if he was what he used to be....because then he would be bringing the circus to town with him lol), but it's a very real possibility, since the league has turned it's back on him, that he'll come in, shutup, and play hard........he's fully capable of giving us 70+ catches with a QB like Jay and a running mate like Marshall to feed off of....

and if this minimal investment doesn't pan out so what !! Cut him


......this is what Im suggesting

Yeah, let's sign him and Braylon and we can have that dynamic duo lined up with B-Marsh.

Ooooo and TJ Hous, Plax, AND Mike Sims-Walker are still out there. Look at all of the awesome receivers that no other team has touched but would kill it playing in Chicago! 5WR sets nobody would be able to stop!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mjh91


Joined: 26 Jun 2011
Posts: 332
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 3:11 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No they shouldn't, Jim.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Chicago Bears All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group