| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Billy Spikes
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 26231
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
21 ALL THE WAY
Joined: 18 Dec 2008
Posts: 2896
Location: WASHINGTON DC
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:37 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
Would be nice to get another 4th round pick for him.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PARROTHEAD
Joined: 08 Mar 2009
Posts: 4165
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Hopefully he stays on his meds and doesnt lose his mind anymore between now and a trade.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RSkinGM
Joined: 06 Mar 2007
Posts: 2667
Location: Richmond, Va
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| The Pats like him,,but probabaly only if he's cut .. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sparky151
Joined: 07 Feb 2012
Posts: 1283
Location: Columbus, OH
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| What are the Redskins asking for him? He's an 11th year guy signed for 1 more year. On the one hand he's coming off his career year, on the other he's not a long term solution anywhere. I'd think the Rams, Jaguars, Browns and perhaps the 49ers or Bengals would be interested. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lavar703
Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Posts: 4835
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Why are we keeping Moss?????????
_________________
| Deets wrote: | | Absolutely nothing. In two years, Ryan Tannehill will be far better than RGIII. |
RIP Sean Taylor "Forever a Redskin" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RunfromLandry
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Posts: 999
Location: Woking, Surrey, UK
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| lavar703 wrote: | | Why are we keeping Moss????????? |
Yeah im confused by that aswell, I can see both our starting receivers changing next year. With regards to Gaffney cant see us getting more than a 6/7 in all honesty |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
footy_29
Joined: 31 Jan 2007
Posts: 11161
Location: The Frozen Tundra that is Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
If you need receiver help in a bad way, I think Gaffney is very attractive. He's inexpensive, he's particularly efficient as an intermediate threat and probably one of the better low cost possession receivers out there.
If you are drafting a second or third round receiver in this draft, I would think there should be some interest in acquiring Gaffney to allow for a maturation period. Whether the team can get anything close to a fourth round pick for him is somewhat suspect, but I hope that happens.
_________________
Blknite01's masterpiece |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dante9876
Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 17528
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| 21 ALL THE WAY wrote: | | Would be nice to get another 4th round pick for him. |
For what? A 4th no way. If somebody calls you with a low 5th Allen will say deal and hang up as soon as possible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BuckleyBoy
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 8260
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| lavar703 wrote: | | Why are we keeping Moss????????? |
What makes you think we are keeping Moss? Today isn't the cut down day
_________________
kiltman on the sig
JMU Class of 2014 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Slateman
Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 4612
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| lavar703 wrote: | | Why are we keeping Moss????????? |
Cap hit would be alot for another team to take on for what amounts to a slot receiver.
And this move is just to make room for Broyles  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BuckleyBoy
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 8260
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Slateman wrote: | | lavar703 wrote: | | Why are we keeping Moss????????? |
Cap hit would be alot for another team to take on for what amounts to a slot receiver.
And this move is just to make room for Broyles |
Cut Moss after June 1st and we'd save money IIRC
_________________
kiltman on the sig
JMU Class of 2014 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
footy_29
Joined: 31 Jan 2007
Posts: 11161
Location: The Frozen Tundra that is Canada
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BuckleyBoy wrote: | | lavar703 wrote: | | Why are we keeping Moss????????? |
What makes you think we are keeping Moss? Today isn't the cut down day |
I anticipate he will be kept unless the team drafts a mid-round receiver (Broyles). Ideally, trading Moss allows the team to draft a replacement. I'm indifferent about keeping Moss considering his untimely drops and the additions this off-season. If Hankerson can play at any point this season at a healthy level, Moss and Gaffney should both go.
_________________
Blknite01's masterpiece |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BuckleyBoy
Joined: 12 Jan 2007
Posts: 8260
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| footy_29 wrote: | | BuckleyBoy wrote: | | lavar703 wrote: | | Why are we keeping Moss????????? |
What makes you think we are keeping Moss? Today isn't the cut down day |
I anticipate he will be kept unless the team drafts a mid-round receiver (Broyles). Ideally, trading Moss allows the team to draft a replacement. I'm indifferent about keeping Moss considering his untimely drops and the additions this off-season. If Hankerson can play at any point this season at a healthy level, Moss and Gaffney should both go. |
He could be kept but yes the draft will be interesting and how it is handled. If cut after June 1st his cap changes as well so that bears watching
_________________
kiltman on the sig
JMU Class of 2014 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lavar703
Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Posts: 4835
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| BuckleyBoy wrote: | | lavar703 wrote: | | Why are we keeping Moss????????? |
What makes you think we are keeping Moss? Today isn't the cut down day |
Because of the reports that Moss will most likely be counted on to be the slot receiver this season.
_________________
| Deets wrote: | | Absolutely nothing. In two years, Ryan Tannehill will be far better than RGIII. |
RIP Sean Taylor "Forever a Redskin" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
