| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
British
Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 482
Location: England
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
palmy50
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 12541
|
 Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:07 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
I just wonder how high he was on the Packers board. That boy is just about cut ideal for the LeBeau zone 30/Capers zone 30! I know there were some in our room that LOVED him.
Bet they had Gilmore over him but would not shock me one bit if Hayward was right there with the other high board CB's.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ThinkICare
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 2712
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| palmy50 wrote: | I just wonder how high he was on the Packers board. That boy is just about cut ideal for the LeBeau zone 30/Capers zone 30! I know there were some in our room that LOVED him.
Bet they had Gilmore over him but would not shock me one bit if Hayward was right there with the other high board CB's. |
You think he could be a decent SS if Peprah/MacMillian/and others fail to impress? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AtariB20
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 3188
Location: The Real Titletown, USA
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| palmy50 wrote: | I just wonder how high he was on the Packers board. That boy is just about cut ideal for the LeBeau zone 30/Capers zone 30! I know there were some in our room that LOVED him.
Bet they had Gilmore over him but would not shock me one bit if Hayward was right there with the other high board CB's. |
By "our room"... Is that Bills? I think I remember you saying something about that in the past? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
palmy50
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 12541
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| AtariB20 wrote: | | palmy50 wrote: | I just wonder how high he was on the Packers board. That boy is just about cut ideal for the LeBeau zone 30/Capers zone 30! I know there were some in our room that LOVED him.
Bet they had Gilmore over him but would not shock me one bit if Hayward was right there with the other high board CB's. |
By "our room"... Is that Bills? I think I remember you saying something about that in the past? |
Nope. Steel city!
My dad worked for the Bills when I was a kid. Father in law still there.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
palmy50
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 12541
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ThinkICare wrote: | | palmy50 wrote: | I just wonder how high he was on the Packers board. That boy is just about cut ideal for the LeBeau zone 30/Capers zone 30! I know there were some in our room that LOVED him.
Bet they had Gilmore over him but would not shock me one bit if Hayward was right there with the other high board CB's. |
You think he could be a decent SS if Peprah/MacMillian/and others fail to impress? |
Lets just hope he works out at CB. Not very big and cuts the legs to get ya down. Tackle willing, but not a plus by any means.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AtariB20
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 3188
Location: The Real Titletown, USA
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| palmy50 wrote: | | AtariB20 wrote: | | palmy50 wrote: | I just wonder how high he was on the Packers board. That boy is just about cut ideal for the LeBeau zone 30/Capers zone 30! I know there were some in our room that LOVED him.
Bet they had Gilmore over him but would not shock me one bit if Hayward was right there with the other high board CB's. |
By "our room"... Is that Bills? I think I remember you saying something about that in the past? |
Nope. Steel city!
My dad worked for the Bills when I was a kid. Father in law still there. |
Oh gotchya. You are a lucky lucky man  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
palmy50
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 12541
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Thank you, I agree... 
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Packerfaninmn
Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 6798
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
palmy50
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 12541
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Packerfaninmn wrote: | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_3lL8jiKaI&feature=player_embedded
Actually a Jarius Wright highlight but I couldn't help but notice our boy repeatedly shutting him down. Lulz. |
MeThinks with Woodson's age that's one of the reason they were so high on Hayward. Man has more than his share on good film inside and grades very well over that general slot body type. All about eyes, leverage, and ball skills in there. Hayward grades elite in all three.
LIS, I wonder how high he was on this Packers board? I don't know how much higher than he went you could take him because of needing help over the top. But that boy sure works well here for many reasons.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
incognito_man
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 26371
Location: Madison
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| i can't believe Hayward flew so under my radar. Had no idea on his turnover and PD numbers. Would have been a lot higher on him otherwise methinks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
CWood21
Joined: 27 Jun 2008
Posts: 30533
Location: 'Merica
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| palmy50 wrote: | | LIS, I wonder how high he was on this Packers board? I don't know how much higher than he went you could take him because of needing help over the top. But that boy sure works well here for many reasons. |
Don't know how true it was, but I remember hearing/reading that he was the "worst case" scenario for Ted in the first round, and he had about 27 something first round talents. Again, not sure how much of it is true, but still interesting to read.
_________________
^sandwhich on the sig^
| iPwn wrote: | | If I was going to blow $2,600 on a night of fun, the last thing I would be thinking to do was play skee ball. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Willink
Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Posts: 10975
Location: Albany, NY
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Rodgers' brother talking him up on twitter
apparently his handle was show_case, awesome nick name.
_________________
| Quote: | If I have not lost my mind I can sometimes hear it preparing to defect
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
palmy50
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 12541
|
| Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 4:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| CWood21 wrote: | | palmy50 wrote: | | LIS, I wonder how high he was on this Packers board? I don't know how much higher than he went you could take him because of needing help over the top. But that boy sure works well here for many reasons. |
Don't know how true it was, but I remember hearing/reading that he was the "worst case" scenario for Ted in the first round, and he had about 27 something first round talents. Again, not sure how much of it is true, but still interesting to read. |
Would not shock me if that's true. One of those players that the grade slot could be all over the board pending the system at hand.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
PossibleCabbage
Joined: 25 Apr 2011
Posts: 2448
|
| Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| palmy50 wrote: | | CWood21 wrote: | | palmy50 wrote: | | LIS, I wonder how high he was on this Packers board? I don't know how much higher than he went you could take him because of needing help over the top. But that boy sure works well here for many reasons. |
Don't know how true it was, but I remember hearing/reading that he was the "worst case" scenario for Ted in the first round, and he had about 27 something first round talents. Again, not sure how much of it is true, but still interesting to read. |
Would not shock me if that's true. One of those players that the grade slot could be all over the board pending the system at hand. |
Plus, if you're picking 28th, you had better figure out 28 players you would be willing to take in the first round, and odds are a good that more than a few of those names will end up getting called on day 2. (Since some players just don't make sense for a specific team to draft high, given matters of roster and scheme.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
