| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Packers1921
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 607
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:26 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| I almost wondering if this was a case of the Packers planning on trading up in the 3rd round at some point to draft Hayward, but the asking price by the Patriots was so low how could you not do the trade? I mean #90 and a 5th round pick for #62 is unreal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr.RodgersNeighborhood
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 995
Location: Illinois
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Can't complain with a ballhawking secondary player. It will be interesting to see how the S situation is handled. I would expect to see Burnett take on a lot of the safety responsibilities vacated by Collins departure, and Woodson to step in as a complimenting S.
The camp battle between Heyward and House should be fun to watch.
_________________
Adopt-a-Packer - Jerel Worthy
Last edited by Mr.RodgersNeighborhood on Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:28 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bkobow05
Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Posts: 28962
Location: Props to PB87 for the RAD sig
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
He's good in zone coverage but he can't tackle. I'm 100% confident we could have gotten him at #90.
_________________
#teamRico
| husker_vikes3 wrote: | | You'll always be my #1. <3 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
packfan4
Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 10598
Location: South Jersey
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Woodson to Safety, lock it up.
Tramon-Shields-Heyward-Bush/House
FS- Burnett SS- Woodson
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GBPACKMAN4LIFE
Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 16372
Location: Spokane, WA
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Patriots gave up 284 points and got back 166.
Hasn't missed a start the last 3 years. I love the pick.
_________________
| cpnesdude41 wrote: | | hope you guys aren't at work.. cuz ur about to get bonerzz. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AmishMafia
Joined: 07 Apr 2011
Posts: 222
Location: Las Vegas
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
What a cheap trade up. I was sure it would have cost us a 4th.
Two more TT myths are biting the dust today.
TT rarely trades up. Its practically expected at this point.
TT never drafts a CB under 6'. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
msmre
Joined: 01 Apr 2005
Posts: 20329
Location: Chicago, IL
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bkobow05 wrote: | | He's good in zone coverage but he can't tackle. I'm 100% confident we could have gotten him at #90. |
100% confidence in something that can never be proven?
I guarantee that you're wrong. 100.1%
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
GoPackGo25
Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 5895
Location: packerbacker87 on the avy!
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
No clue what to think of this, but it is an area of need and I trust TT.
_________________
Credit: TheDeeeeej |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DavidatMIZZOU
Joined: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 6041
Location: The ZOU
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| GBPACKMAN4LIFE wrote: | Patriots gave up 284 points and got back 166.
Hasn't missed a start the last 3 years. I love the pick. |
They also got 2 picks. After this they were done, IIRC. Their defense was nearly as poor as ours. They need to add people.
_________________
GO PACK GO!
I won an award on the Packers forum, most grumpiest or something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ArodFanboy
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 2345
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| bkobow05 wrote: | | He's good in zone coverage but he can't tackle. I'm 100% confident we could have gotten him at #90. |
Actually Heyward is a very underrated tackler. I love this guy, hes extremely undervalued but has the same size and ball skill ability as Mo Claiborne. Josh Robinson and Trumaine Johnson got picked right after we took Heyward, your really confident he would be passed over 21 more times when he would clearly be the best CB left with those two gone?
_________________
^Kempes on the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bkobow05
Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Posts: 28962
Location: Props to PB87 for the RAD sig
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| msmre wrote: | | bkobow05 wrote: | | He's good in zone coverage but he can't tackle. I'm 100% confident we could have gotten him at #90. |
100% confidence in something that can never be proven?
I guarantee that you're wrong. 100.1% |
 I suppose.
My opinion, then, is that we could have gotten him at #90.
_________________
#teamRico
| husker_vikes3 wrote: | | You'll always be my #1. <3 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
IrishGreen
Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 30833
Location: Wisconsin
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| AmishMafia wrote: | What a cheap trade up. I was sure it would have cost us a 4th.
Two more TT myths are biting the dust today.
TT rarely trades up. Its practically expected at this point.
TT never drafts a CB under 6'. |
well he is like 5'11.5"
it's more like TT never drafts anyone under 5'11"
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DavidatMIZZOU
Joined: 09 Apr 2009
Posts: 6041
Location: The ZOU
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| msmre wrote: | | bkobow05 wrote: | | He's good in zone coverage but he can't tackle. I'm 100% confident we could have gotten him at #90. |
100% confidence in something that can never be proven?
I guarantee that you're wrong. 100.1% |
I am 1002% sure that you can't prove that.
I feel this pick is underwhelming. Hope he proves me wrong.
_________________
GO PACK GO!
I won an award on the Packers forum, most grumpiest or something. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bkobow05
Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Posts: 28962
Location: Props to PB87 for the RAD sig
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| ArodFanboy wrote: | | bkobow05 wrote: | | He's good in zone coverage but he can't tackle. I'm 100% confident we could have gotten him at #90. |
Actually Heyward is a very underrated tackler. I love this guy, hes extremely undervalued but has the same size and ball skill ability as Mo Claiborne. Josh Robinson and Trumaine Johnson got picked right after we took Heyward, your really confident he would be passed over 21 more times when he would clearly be the best CB left with those two gone? |
Depends on what teams' boards/needs were. Bentley, Dennard, Boykin, Norman and Leonard Johnson could have feasibly been ranked ahead of him on numerous boards.
I'm not mad at the pick. In fact, I wanted him in G&G, just not at #62. Hope he turns out to be a stud, obviously.
_________________
#teamRico
| husker_vikes3 wrote: | | You'll always be my #1. <3 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
{Family Ghost}
Joined: 08 Jun 2010
Posts: 1026
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Mayock loves Hayward .. Had him rated in the mid 30's. The guy seems like a good fit for the Packers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
