| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SPaceGhost
Joined: 01 Mar 2008
Posts: 2086
Location: Alabama
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:22 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: |
seems like some offensive guys didnt even try I wonder how he does vrs better comp. I think he can be a good 3-4 de not nt tho |
Hell no, this guy belongs in a DT spot. He looked good from a DE standup position, but when he was in the middle and in the three point stance I saw him with reaction time, strength, holding his position, and getting after the QB when it was his call to go put someone on their back.
DT all the way.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12585
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SPaceGhost wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: |
seems like some offensive guys didnt even try I wonder how he does vrs better comp. I think he can be a good 3-4 de not nt tho |
Hell no, this guy belongs in a DT spot. He looked good from a DE standup position, but when he was in the middle and in the three point stance I saw him with reaction time, strength, holding his position, and getting after the QB when it was his call to go put someone on their back.
DT all the way. |
as nt i think o-lineman will get under his pads too easy.
as a ut or 3-4 de he can excell imo. kinda reminds me of tko all penetrate no run stuffing.
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BlackPrestige92
Joined: 08 Nov 2011
Posts: 2620
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| SPaceGhost wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: |
seems like some offensive guys didnt even try I wonder how he does vrs better comp. I think he can be a good 3-4 de not nt tho |
Hell no, this guy belongs in a DT spot. He looked good from a DE standup position, but when he was in the middle and in the three point stance I saw him with reaction time, strength, holding his position, and getting after the QB when it was his call to go put someone on their back.
DT all the way. |
Agreed!
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Blazer026
Joined: 01 Feb 2009
Posts: 2205
Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Based off the highlight videos, I like Burris the most.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OakRaiders3828
Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 9145
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 2:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | SPaceGhost wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: |
seems like some offensive guys didnt even try I wonder how he does vrs better comp. I think he can be a good 3-4 de not nt tho |
Hell no, this guy belongs in a DT spot. He looked good from a DE standup position, but when he was in the middle and in the three point stance I saw him with reaction time, strength, holding his position, and getting after the QB when it was his call to go put someone on their back.
DT all the way. |
as nt i think o-lineman will get under his pads too easy.
as a ut or 3-4 de he can excell imo. kinda reminds me of tko all penetrate no run stuffing. |
Nah, he's the next John Henderson
Edit: actually, coming out Henderson was 6-7 306. Ended up at 335. If biukidi throws on 10-15 lbs to be 320-324 I think he can absolutely be a legit NT. Time will tell.
_________________
O A K L A N D R A I D E R S
Joe_is_the_best on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10587
Location: East Oakland
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I don't care what you call him as long as he stops the run.
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BlackPrestige92
Joined: 08 Nov 2011
Posts: 2620
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| agarcia34 wrote: | | Miles Burris kid has a non stop motor can fight of blocks is fast can rush the passer. IDK why but when I was watching his clips he runs and his stance is just like Clay Matthews. Curry better watch out. |
Sike. AC has a non stop motor as well, and his intensity is 2nd to none on the Oakland D. Hittin Tebow in the mouth, punching the goal post, knocking out an All-pro LT, etc....
if anything Wheeler might have to watch out. But AC? Naaaaaaaah
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DOCLEW 28
Joined: 10 Nov 2006
Posts: 10587
Location: East Oakland
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
Good combo for sure. Good competition out there too.
_________________
Raider X hooked me with the sig |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Roninho
Joined: 10 Feb 2009
Posts: 1620
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Roninho wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | Crawford. could be that real DE total package we have been looking for for decades. |
what do you like about him? |
i like penn state and he def looks like a nfl DE he has had some injuries and is hella raw but when he is on he is on and almost unstoppable like vrs ohio state last year. once he develops into his body he will beast imo. he is so beastly he doesnt need eyebrows lol
 monster |
Thanks. Would be nice to see what he does if he bulks up a bit, seems a bit low on the weight considering his height.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Heart of Oak
Joined: 02 Feb 2008
Posts: 3057
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
My two favourite picks are:
1. Bergstrom - system fit, high character guy, will hopefully upgrade Carlisle. If he pans out, as I am sure he will, our O-line is looking solid, with only a bit of a question mark at RT - though both Barnes and Barksdale are better than Cornell Green.
2. Criner - We didn't really need a WR, but he is the type of WR we were missing (if that makes sense). Hopefully is Chaz Schilens without the injuries. This is really good value.
Burris is also a decent pick, but might excel more in a 3-4, Crawford and Bilikuliodi (sp) look a little like projects with massive upside (but this is where you pick guys like this, not in the high rounds like we used to  ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Baggabonez
Joined: 29 Apr 2010
Posts: 3768
Location: RaiderNation
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
I'm generally numb to the entire draft. I think McKenzie drafted specific ingredients to make a dish that is currently unfamiliar to me at the moment whereas before Uncle AL would purchase exotic ingredients and expect a novice chef or veggie chopper (ie rookie HC) to make something spectacular that would change food culture.
I used to be impatient as I knew the former philosophy wouldn't work. Many of players drafted were polarizing and fans had strong opinions and prejudgements. However, I am content to give McKenzie a 12 month grace period as MANY others have stated these prospects can best be classified as conservative selections that don't draw strong criticism although initially leave you feeling underwhelmed.
_________________
2013 Mancrush: DT Richardson, OT Joeckel, FS Vaccaro, FS Rambo, WR Dobson, RB Michael, TE McDonald, OT Foketi, WR Swope |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
NCOUGHMAN
Joined: 25 Mar 2008
Posts: 12585
Location: Stockton via East Palo Alto
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| OakRaiders3828 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: | | SPaceGhost wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN wrote: |
seems like some offensive guys didnt even try I wonder how he does vrs better comp. I think he can be a good 3-4 de not nt tho |
Hell no, this guy belongs in a DT spot. He looked good from a DE standup position, but when he was in the middle and in the three point stance I saw him with reaction time, strength, holding his position, and getting after the QB when it was his call to go put someone on their back.
DT all the way. |
as nt i think o-lineman will get under his pads too easy.
as a ut or 3-4 de he can excell imo. kinda reminds me of tko all penetrate no run stuffing. |
Nah, he's the next John Henderson
Edit: actually, coming out Henderson was 6-7 306. Ended up at 335. If biukidi throws on 10-15 lbs to be 320-324 I think he can absolutely be a legit NT. Time will tell. |
id like to see that happen
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | NCOUGHMAN >>>>>> all of you |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rodya
Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Posts: 987
Location: san jose, ca
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
ok. after letting this draft thing digest in me like a medium pizza and 4 beers i'm ready to come out of hibernation. the one pick that really intrigues me the most is crawford. right now, he plays too high. he doesn't have great technique. he doesn't have much experience, and i don't expect much from him in the near future. BUT.....
this brotha has some CRAZY intangibles. his frame is only going to fill out more. and by watching richard seymour and having the coaches get this kid ready, i really feel like the sky is the limit for him. he has the motor. he has the athleticism. he has the strength and the power. he's just raw and needs to be molded. he's the perfect, roll the dice in the latter rounds type prospect that al would have taken in the second. he flashed alot at penn state so he is used to big time college football. and
after listening to his interview on sirius i am definitely excited to watch his growth. he's humble and he wants to put in the work. it's going to be fun to see what happens...... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OakRaiders3828
Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 9145
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Being a Penn state guy, I really hope stupar and Crawford make the team. Crawford just needs to learn to play lower and stupar could be that nickel coverage linebacker we've been lacking. That was his thing at Penn until he became a full time starter as a senior. Both guys should take a year to adapt but I look for both to contribute in 2013, and stupar will a special teams Guy right off the bat. May even be a 3rd down LB as a rookie in place of curry or McClain seeing as both struggle in coverage.
_________________
O A K L A N D R A I D E R S
Joe_is_the_best on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chali21
Joined: 07 Feb 2007
Posts: 1709
Location: Cali
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 10:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
I couldn't tell watching buriss' highlights is he was good at pass rushing or if the blockers just sucked. I'm inclined to think the latter. I do hope that he can be a beast on the team however.
My favorite is the guard great pick and it will help solidify our young o-line. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
