| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Suffering_Bills
Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3319
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
|
 Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:44 am Post subject: |
 |
|
|
| Shazor4 wrote: | | How did the Seahawks have a shaky draft last year? We got 4 starters including which is a lot more than some teams combined. |
Does the name Carpenter ring a bell? Oh, and it was starters by default, as much as anything else. Now, let's please just stick to the subject at hand. 
_________________
Why have a signature? I don't need to be famous................................................. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shazor4
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 1046
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Suffering_Bills wrote: | | Shazor4 wrote: | | How did the Seahawks have a shaky draft last year? We got 4 starters including which is a lot more than some teams combined. |
Does the name Carpenter ring a bell? Oh, and it was starters by default, as much as anything else. Now, let's please just stick to the subject at hand. |
Starters that played very well
Irvin may be a reach but he is a perfect fit for the LEO. Same size as Chris Clemons but much quicker. Could have a big impact off the edge.
_________________
Adopt a Hawk - Russell Wilson - 252 / 393 64.1% 3118 Yards 26 TD 10 INT 94 ATT 489 YDS 4 TDs
The best QB on the Seattle Seahawks |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Suffering_Bills
Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3319
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Shazor4 wrote: | | Suffering_Bills wrote: | | Shazor4 wrote: | | How did the Seahawks have a shaky draft last year? We got 4 starters including which is a lot more than some teams combined. |
Does the name Carpenter ring a bell? Oh, and it was starters by default, as much as anything else. Now, let's please just stick to the subject at hand. |
Starters that played very well
Irvin may be a reach but he is a perfect fit for the LEO. Same size as Chris Clemons but much quicker. Could have a big impact off the edge. |
Anything "could" happen. Like the Seahawks just having had a puke-inducing draft. Could darned sure be the case! 
_________________
Why have a signature? I don't need to be famous................................................. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
candyman93
Joined: 02 Dec 2009
Posts: 34840
Location: Adopt a Brownie 2012: TJ Ward
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| yesweCAM wrote: | | 2. Cleveland: #22 overall for a 29 year old QB when you have McCoy doesn't make any sense. |
Colt sucks but I understand the first point
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sacks98
Joined: 21 Dec 2009
Posts: 3503
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Shazor4 wrote: | | How did the Seahawks have a shaky draft last year? We got 4 solid starters which is a lot more than some teams combined. |
Yep just like Sherman and Chancellor were to tall to play there positions i think i will put my trust in Pete and John i will wait and see how they play before i judge there draft.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wolverine_Joe
Joined: 23 Oct 2007
Posts: 2674
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
lol at people thinking pats had a bad draft.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Canadian_Patriot
Joined: 26 Jan 2005
Posts: 8701
Location: Halifax
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Wolverine_Joe wrote: | | lol at people thinking pats had a bad draft. |
Pretty classic. People are pretending like Jake Bequette just doesn't exist.
_________________
Deadpulse on the sig! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Suffering_Bills
Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3319
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Wolverine_Joe wrote: | | lol at people thinking pats had a bad draft. |
It was HORRIBLE.  -Sheer LUNACY to think OTHERWISE.
_________________
Why have a signature? I don't need to be famous................................................. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Suffering_Bills
Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3319
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Canadian_Patriot wrote: | | Wolverine_Joe wrote: | | lol at people thinking pats had a bad draft. |
Pretty classic. People are pretending like Jake Bequette just doesn't exist. |
Ah-HA! Is this "Bequette" the secret ingredient that will make your draft NOT suck?
_________________
Why have a signature? I don't need to be famous................................................. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Its A Sabotage
Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 28105
Location: Do. Your. Job.
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anyone care to tell me what needs were there that we needed in the 3rd outside of Punter? We covered all of them either in the 1st and 2nd rounds or in Free Agecny.
_________________
| green24 wrote: | | Sabo is the best poster on FF |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rabbisson
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 28044
Location: #PoWwWwWvidence
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Canadian_Patriot wrote: | | Wolverine_Joe wrote: | | lol at people thinking pats had a bad draft. |
Pretty classic. People are pretending like Jake Bequette just doesn't exist. |
Or that the Chargers weren't going to take Tavon Wilson at 49 if we hadn't grabbed him.
Or that we didn't get Nate THE BEAST Ebner.
_________________
| Iggles wrote: | | This guy gets it. Seriously, the ideas being espoused here need to get to 88 mph so they can go back to the 1950's. |
Last year Brandon Bolden...this year Zach Sudfeld! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Suffering_Bills
Joined: 10 Apr 2006
Posts: 3319
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| rabbisson wrote: | | Canadian_Patriot wrote: | | Wolverine_Joe wrote: | | lol at people thinking pats had a bad draft. |
Pretty classic. People are pretending like Jake Bequette just doesn't exist. |
Or that the Chargers weren't going to take Tavon Wilson at 49 if we hadn't grabbed him.
Or that we didn't get Nate THE BEAST Ebner. |
Give it up. This draft SLURPED for New England.
_________________
Why have a signature? I don't need to be famous................................................. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
charles shelton
Joined: 22 Jan 2007
Posts: 1666
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Its A Sabotage wrote: | | Anyone care to tell me what needs were there that we needed in the 3rd outside of Punter? We covered all of them either in the 1st and 2nd rounds or in Free Agecny. |
Everyone is saying cb b/c you know..if espn says that is a team need then it must be true. I wasn't thrilled about taking a punter in the 3rd, but it was hardly the worst pick of the round or is by itself enough to proclaim the jaguars draft as one of the 3 worst. Their first 2 picks alone are enough to make this a good draft for them. They got the consensus best wr in the draft and a de many had projected in the first who I think has great potential as a 4-3 end, especially if he can fill out his frame a little more.
Anyway, as usual, the only time espn or nfl network talks about us at all is when we do something they can criticize....as if it was the only questionable pick in the draft, and most fans being sheep, it's easy for them to focus on this one pick. As with all drafts, we shall see.
-Charles |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
green24
Joined: 10 Apr 2010
Posts: 26522
Location: #GenoSith
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
1. Steelers
2. Panthers
3. Bengals
Sleepers: Jets, Seahawks (minus Irvin)
1. Broncos
2. Patriots
3. Washington (despite RG3)
_________________
JMG and sandwhich on the sigs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Xfaxtor
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 12195
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
|
| Its A Sabotage wrote: | | Anyone care to tell me what needs were there that we needed in the 3rd outside of Punter? We covered all of them either in the 1st and 2nd rounds or in Free Agecny. |
Are you seriously trying to justify taking a punter in the third? Wow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
