Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

Grade the Offseason!
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Jacksonville Jaguars
View previous topic :: View next topic  

How did we do?
A+
4%
 4%  [ 1 ]
A
23%
 23%  [ 5 ]
B
52%
 52%  [ 11 ]
C
4%
 4%  [ 1 ]
D
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
F
14%
 14%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 21

Author Message
iPwn


Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 35420
Location: Stand United
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:51 pm    Post subject: Grade the Offseason! Reply with quote

We have officially reached dead season. From here until the start of the season, we likely won't see any additions or subtractions that will play large role in the team's makeup. With that in mind, before we get to see these guys in action, how would you grade the offseason we have had?

Coaches Lost
HC Jack Del Rio (midseason)
OC Dirk Koetter
ST Russ Purnell

Coaching Added
OC Bob Bratkowski
ST John Bonamego
HC Mike Mularkey
DC Mel Tucker (Retained, after being courted for head coaching jobs)

We also had a wide variety of changes at many other positions as well. Such is to be expected with a new coaching regime. For a full list, look here for last year's coaching staff, and here for the current staff.

Retained Free Agents
LB Russell Allen
RB Brock Bolen
S Courtney Greene
S Dwight Lowery
CB Rashean Mathis
CB William Middleton
DE Jeremy Mincey
DT C.J. Mosley
TE Zach Potter
K Josh Scobee (Franchised, unsigned)
OT Guy Whimper

Lost Free Agents
DT Leger Douzable
QB Luke McCown
CB David Jones
DE Matt Roth

Cuts
CB Drew Coleman
P Nick Harris
RB Deji Karim
WR Kassim Osgood

Free Agents Added
WR Lee Evans
QB Chad Henne
DT David Howard
WR Laurent Robinson
CB Aaron Ross

Draft
P Bryan Anger
WR Justin Blackmon
DE Andre Branch
CB Mike Harris
LB Brandon Marshall
DT Jeris Pendleton

I tried to get most of the relative key additions and subtractions. If I missed any big ones, let me know.

With that said, how did we do?

*in before it's too early to tell, or on paper every team looks better post*

I know I left out A-, B+, etc. But deal with it. I don't want 50 billion options.
_________________
samgurl775 wrote:
It's alright iPwn, you're my #1.
EliteTexan80 wrote:
I AM TRYING TO BE PWNY! AND I AM NOT! AND THIS VEXES ME SORE!!!


Last edited by iPwn on Thu May 03, 2012 5:04 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jagman777


Joined: 30 May 2006
Posts: 5470
Location: 904
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We brought in some players that will definitely compete to improve this team. The biggest question IMO is the coaching staff, because it's up to them to salvage Gabbert and make him a franchise QB. We truly have no idea if they are capable of doing that as of yet, so it has to be an INC, but if I turn a blind eye to that unknown, I'd give us a solid B.
_________________
StevePerry wrote:
Trust Steve. A belt buckle of that quality will change your life.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
mikeyfarley


Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Posts: 4316
Location: floride
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like what they did for the most part, but they did nothing with the 0-line. Re-signing Guy Whimper? Seems like he'll be the top backup at LT and RT again, so we need to hope there's no games missed by Monroe or Britton. I guess Spitz will be the top backup for all 3 int. line positions.

Would have liked another LB to compete with Session. Other than that they did a great job of addressing the teams needs.

Hopefully Mularkey does a good job improving the passing offense. The Jags should be able to have a winning season and make the playoffs with the schedule they have as long as there's no big o-line injuries.
_________________
scrimmage wrote:
Tebow just went PREIST MODE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
McMorrow_922


Joined: 21 Dec 2011
Posts: 2532
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Great Offseason. I think Mularkey will be a big role in developing Gabbert. I really like are chances of becoming a contender this year.
_________________


Adopt a JAGUAR

Laurent Robinson-

Marcedes Lewis-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
MJD4MVP5455


Joined: 08 Mar 2011
Posts: 1200
Location: Boca Raton
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I give the offseason a solid B+...we filled some needs but there is still room for improvement...the development of gabbert can make the offseason go up to an A or down to a C
_________________
[img] [/img]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sadjag


Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 846
Location: jax
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mikeyfarley wrote:
I like what they did for the most part, but they did nothing with the 0-line. Re-signing Guy Whimper? Seems like he'll be the top backup at LT and RT again, so we need to hope there's no games missed by Monroe or Britton. I guess Spitz will be the top backup for all 3 int. line positions.

Would have liked another LB to compete with Session. Other than that they did a great job of addressing the teams needs.

Hopefully Mularkey does a good job improving the passing offense. The Jags should be able to have a winning season and make the playoffs with the schedule they have as long as there's no big o-line injuries.
I'd like too think that Bradfield can fill in as the primary back-up he looked good the little he played. We simply cant let whimperplay tackle the man is a sieve.
_________________
...What?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikeyfarley


Joined: 16 Jan 2008
Posts: 4316
Location: floride
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 9:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sadjag wrote:
mikeyfarley wrote:
I like what they did for the most part, but they did nothing with the 0-line. Re-signing Guy Whimper? Seems like he'll be the top backup at LT and RT again, so we need to hope there's no games missed by Monroe or Britton. I guess Spitz will be the top backup for all 3 int. line positions.

Would have liked another LB to compete with Session. Other than that they did a great job of addressing the teams needs.

Hopefully Mularkey does a good job improving the passing offense. The Jags should be able to have a winning season and make the playoffs with the schedule they have as long as there's no big o-line injuries.
I'd like too think that Bradfield can fill in as the primary back-up he looked good the little he played. We simply cant let whimperplay tackle the man is a sieve.


The Jags gave a $1 million signing bonus to Whimper(on a two year deal), so I don't think he'll be that far down on the depth chart.

Bradfield played quite a bit against the Falcons last season and gave up 1.5 sacks in that game. I don't think it's realistic to think an UDFA OT is going to come in for an extended period of time and do a good job. I definitely don't want the Jags playoff hopes in the hands of one.
_________________
scrimmage wrote:
Tebow just went PREIST MODE
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Its A Sabotage


Moderator
Joined: 14 May 2010
Posts: 28103
Location: Do. Your. Job.
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd say B...ESPN graded us an A scannerheadexplode.gif
_________________


green24 wrote:
Sabo is the best poster on FF
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JaguarCrazy2832


Joined: 28 Jun 2008
Posts: 73469
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 6:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its A Sabotage wrote:
I'd say B...ESPN graded us an A scannerheadexplode.gif


We got an A for the offseason by a non-Jaguar friendly source Shocked


The offensive line worries me. 1 injury to Britton or Monroe, we are in trouble
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adrenaline_Flux


Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 15078
Location: The Iowa
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 7:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JaguarCrazy2832 wrote:
Its A Sabotage wrote:
I'd say B...ESPN graded us an A scannerheadexplode.gif


We got an A for the offseason by a non-Jaguar friendly source Shocked


The offensive line worries me. 1 injury to Britton or Monroe, we are in trouble


How many teams can say otherwise about their starting offensive tackles?
_________________


Sig Credit: ChrisC21325
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MoJo122-b-21


Joined: 01 Dec 2009
Posts: 5754
Location: Not London!
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adrenaline_Flux wrote:
JaguarCrazy2832 wrote:
Its A Sabotage wrote:
I'd say B...ESPN graded us an A scannerheadexplode.gif


We got an A for the offseason by a non-Jaguar friendly source Shocked


The offensive line worries me. 1 injury to Britton or Monroe, we are in trouble


How many teams can say otherwise about their starting offensive tackles?


Can't think of any. Just like there isn't a QB Tree, there isn't a Tackle Tree either. I think it's a great thing that we can say we have a legitimate top ten left tackle and a very good right tackle, when healthy of course. You always want better depth, but it's not as if Whimper and Bradfield are just garbage. I think Whimper's struggles are more than a little bit exaggerated - he's not exactly starting caliber but he isn't some bum either, he was just the weak link on a pretty good line last season*.

*take an objective look at some of those sacks last season - more than a few were coverage sacks.
_________________

"We're not trying to win the AFC South, we're trying to own the AFC South."
- Gus Bradley


Last edited by MoJo122-b-21 on Tue May 01, 2012 9:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
iPwn


Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2009
Posts: 35420
Location: Stand United
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The line was pretty good last year before the injuries and musical chairs at the positions.

Surprising though, as the season wore on, the run game heated up. Without looking up stats, I'm not sure how much that was the o-line playing better, or MJD just beasting.

And if Whimper's problems were partially tied to his injury, we could see things greatly improve from him.
_________________
samgurl775 wrote:
It's alright iPwn, you're my #1.
EliteTexan80 wrote:
I AM TRYING TO BE PWNY! AND I AM NOT! AND THIS VEXES ME SORE!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Adrenaline_Flux


Joined: 19 Dec 2008
Posts: 15078
Location: The Iowa
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember there being talk not long ago that part of the reason Gabbert held onto the ball too long sometimes was because guys were running the wrong routes too often and weren't where they were supposed to be. With the group improved and the coaches improved, I'd imagine that won't be occurring as often.
_________________


Sig Credit: ChrisC21325
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
McMorrow_922


Joined: 21 Dec 2011
Posts: 2532
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 9:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Adrenaline_Flux wrote:
I remember there being talk not long ago that part of the reason Gabbert held onto the ball too long sometimes was because guys were running the wrong routes too often and weren't where they were supposed to be. With the group improved and the coaches improved, I'd imagine that won't be occurring as often.

I thought I read that to, Ima try & find where.
_________________


Adopt a JAGUAR

Laurent Robinson-

Marcedes Lewis-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Tugboat


Joined: 30 Mar 2011
Posts: 1309
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2012 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll give it a B- for the offseason.

They made the obvious changes and took steps to remedy some of the obvious holes, so that's good. Things definitely appear to be moving in the right direciton. But at the same time, it's hard to give huge credit on the housecleaning with the coaching staff, as: a)it was painfully obvious that it needed to be done, and b)i'm optimistic about the selections made, but i'll reserve paying credit for the decisions until i see what these new folks can put on the field.

The WR position also falls under the category of 'instant F if not significantly addressed' for me. So while Gene took some clear steps in the right direction, i'm hesitant to give too much credit there. I'll give credit for staying out of some of the silly money that got thrown around in FA, but i'm still not convinced the position is where it really needs to be. If Robinson pans out as a legitimate reliable #2 WR who can stretch the field, and Evans can bring something of value on the field, things look a lot better and i'll give it more than a marginal passing grade. But as it stands, i have my reservations about the weapons brought in, and whether it's enough. I'll give it a C+ sort of grade for now, but there is the potential for it to exceed that if things go exceptionally well on all fronts there. However, i'm more than a little bit skeptical when it comes to expecting an entire WR corps to exceed expectations...last year's debacle was a clear example of what happens when you expect everyone to be better than they've ever been before.

The DE need looks to have been at least partially addressed, but again, nothing exceeding expectations for me there. Just a passing grade on that, nothing more.

Keeping our own key free agents was good, but again...just a pass from me. With a leg up on keeping the guys and a boatload of cap space to work with, there was really no great reason for Gene to NOT retain these guys. If we'd lost some of the guys, those would be dings on the offseason grade, and by the same token, i'm reluctant to give a large amount of credit for retaining these guys.

The draft was a real mixed bag for me. The first 2 picks i liked quite a bit, but beyond that, not overly excited about it to be honest. The 3rd round punter pick is a big minus for me. High risk, relatively low reward pick there. If Anger does turn out to be an 'elite' punter, the pick is worth it...but anything less, and it's a big miss, and i'm just not at all sold on the idea that the upside is there when you're talking punters. The other later round picks seem alright, but there's nothing there that really wows me. So as a whole, not much more than a passing grade there from me.

The QB position is obviously looking like the biggest make or break position for this season, but i'm not going to credit any negative or positive there really. That's on Blaine Gabbert's shoulders, and i don't think it really falls under the jurisdiction of 'offseason grading'. They brought in a 'plan B' in Henne who is about as good as you could hope for given the circumstances, so i'll give a bit of credit there, but it's far from a major coup, bringing in an adequate backup plan for a young QB with a lot of questionmarks.

There are also a couple of noteworthy deficiencies that i still see there with this team that weren't addressed. First up is the O-Line depth. When healthy, our line looks pretty good, but there's just too little solid depth, particularly given the injury risk we've got there. I'm disappointed that more wasn't done to bolster the tackle position in particular.

I also would've liked to see something more substantial done with our RB position. MJD is great, but he absolutely cannot continue to see the sort of abuse he did last year, and i'm more than a bit wary of leaning entirely on Rashad Jennings returning to form and really lifting a big share of the burden coming off injury and a completely lost season like that. Especially when there was so much excellent value out there on the FA market and in the draft at the RB position. A 3rd useful and productive back would not have been the end of the world if Jennings does return strong and ready...on the other hand, if Jennings doesn't return strong...a lack of strong alternative options is a major problem.

A bit more depth at at LB and TE would have been nice as well. But those aren't huge issues.

As a whole though, it's a B- offseason for me. Gene did make clear strides towards improving the worst of our problems at WR, DE and above all, the coaching staff. But most of these changes are things that i considered 'MUST FIX' issues...the sort that you get an instant fail for not addressing. So it certainly looks like progress in the right direction, but it's just a passing grade of 'C' from me for not completely missing the mark. The draft is also fairly neutral for me, as is free agency where we largely just hung on to our own guys. Changing the coaching staff is a 'C' for me as it was absolutely blatantly obvious that it needed to be done, but i do like what i've seen and heard from the choices made, so i'll give a boost for that. Using precise mathematical calculations and whatnot, i'd say that brings it up to about a C+ or B- for me overall.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Jacksonville Jaguars All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group