Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

So Starks is going to carry the load.
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
fattlipp


Joined: 12 Jan 2005
Posts: 487
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:23 pm    Post subject: So Starks is going to carry the load. Reply with quote

I love it, I have him as a very cheap keeper in 2 fantasy leagues, but if it were not for that, I'm not sure I would be satisfied. Will Greene be totally healthy but camp even? Carolina and SF seem to have an overload of RB's

Car
Williams/Stewart/Tolbert

SF
Gore/James/Jacobs/Hunter/Dixon

Making a trade for either Stewart or Hunter would make some sense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
OakRaiders3828


Joined: 18 Aug 2007
Posts: 9157
Location: Pennsylvania
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carolina traded goodson so I doubt they trade Stewart. Tolbert is more of a fullback for them.
_________________

O A K L A N D R A I D E R S
Joe_is_the_best on the sig!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SDN40


Joined: 13 Jan 2008
Posts: 3122
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

He may be carrying the load - but it wont be a very big one
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gizmo2012


Joined: 11 Mar 2007
Posts: 2345
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is way too early to assume anything other then Starks will likely go into training camp as the #1 RB. I do believe there will be an additional move or two at RB, but I think it is safe to say Starks will be listed #1.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
phillipraz


Joined: 27 Oct 2007
Posts: 2608
Location: Phoenix, AZ
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

if grant is coming back (not up to date on the situation) then i think ill be ok. if not, would really like us to get someone else in there.
_________________

^ Peppers90

Twitter: fill3up
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
British


Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Posts: 482
Location: England
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Starks best role is as the load carrying guy who pretty reliably picks up 4 yards. He doesn't have the second gear to regularly take it to the house but as a starting back on 1st and 2nd down he's a good option.

Green is the question mark. Has the hands, vision and patience on screens to be an excellent 3rd down back. Maybe more.

I could see us bringing back Grant on the cheap for TC. He may be 29 but he's got hardly any wear on his tyres for a guy that age. Underused in college, backup in NY and had a year out in 2010. I don't like him as a #1 but he does have greater top end speed than Starks and provides more of a home run threat.

If not, Saine looked ok last year and could make a 2nd year jump.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Greg_Jennings


Joined: 06 Nov 2006
Posts: 22849
Location: Milwaukee
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I imagine he'll be splitting carries in some capacity with Green.
_________________

In the end, it wasn't guns or bombs that defeated the aliens. It was the humblest of all God's creatures, the Tyrannosaurus Rex.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IrishGreen


Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 30852
Location: Wisconsin
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

WE DON'T NEED A RB


FREAKING A
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Packerfaninmn


Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 6800
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IrishGreen wrote:
WE DON'T NEED A RB


FREAKING A

I agree. We only run a handful of times so the mediocre talent we have at the position will do.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blueswedeshoes


Joined: 08 Jun 2011
Posts: 850
Location: WisKAHNsin
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IrishGreen wrote:
WE DON'T NEED A RB


FREAKING A


We don't need a running back.

We need a running back that can pick up the blitz and catch out of the backfield.
_________________
MNPackfan32 wrote:
This team has enough Old Spice and State Farm leaders and not enough curb stomp you in a bar fight guys.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AmishMafia


Joined: 07 Apr 2011
Posts: 222
Location: Las Vegas
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Packerfaninmn wrote:
IrishGreen wrote:
WE DON'T NEED A RB


FREAKING A

I agree. We only run a handful of times so the mediocre talent we have at the position will do.
Maybe if the RB talent wasn't mediocre we would run more.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nfldraftguru1


Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 8040
Location: eau claire, wi
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AmishMafia wrote:
Packerfaninmn wrote:
IrishGreen wrote:
WE DON'T NEED A RB


FREAKING A

I agree. We only run a handful of times so the mediocre talent we have at the position will do.
Maybe if the RB talent wasn't mediocre we would run more.


I agree, we should definately take the ball out of the best player in the NFL's hands more often... Rolling Eyes
_________________

packer backer forever-ker
Packerbacker87's work
Quote:
Just like anything, the more you know, the more you realize you don't know.


Follow me @rcon14
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
IrishGreen


Joined: 22 Mar 2007
Posts: 30852
Location: Wisconsin
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nfldraftguru1 wrote:
AmishMafia wrote:
Packerfaninmn wrote:
IrishGreen wrote:
WE DON'T NEED A RB


FREAKING A

I agree. We only run a handful of times so the mediocre talent we have at the position will do.
Maybe if the RB talent wasn't mediocre we would run more.


I agree, we should definately take the ball out of the best player in the NFL's hands more often... Rolling Eyes


Not too mention I'm absolutely fed up with Alex Green! Every time he touches the ball I get pissed off!
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Packerfaninmn


Joined: 03 Jul 2007
Posts: 6800
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IrishGreen wrote:
nfldraftguru1 wrote:
AmishMafia wrote:
Packerfaninmn wrote:
IrishGreen wrote:
WE DON'T NEED A RB


FREAKING A

I agree. We only run a handful of times so the mediocre talent we have at the position will do.
Maybe if the RB talent wasn't mediocre we would run more.


I agree, we should definately take the ball out of the best player in the NFL's hands more often... Rolling Eyes


Not too mention I'm absolutely fed up with Alex Green! Every time he touches the ball I get pissed off!

I'm fed up with glass rbs.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
GBPACKMAN4LIFE


Joined: 17 Dec 2007
Posts: 16377
Location: Spokane, WA
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IrishGreen wrote:
nfldraftguru1 wrote:
AmishMafia wrote:
Packerfaninmn wrote:
IrishGreen wrote:
WE DON'T NEED A RB


FREAKING A

I agree. We only run a handful of times so the mediocre talent we have at the position will do.
Maybe if the RB talent wasn't mediocre we would run more.


I agree, we should definately take the ball out of the best player in the NFL's hands more often... Rolling Eyes


Not too mention I'm absolutely fed up with Alex Green! Every time he touches the ball I get pissed off!


A joke I assume? 3 NFL carries.

Starks will carry the load until it breaks him. I'm not sold on any of the RBs until they can do something of substance for more than 1 game.
_________________

cpnesdude41 wrote:
hope you guys aren't at work.. cuz ur about to get bonerzz.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Green Bay Packers All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group