Discuss football with over 60,000 fans. Free Membership. Join now!

 FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

FootballsFuture.com Forum Index
FootballsFuture.com Home

1st Annual Seahawks Forum Fantasy Football DRAFT DONE!!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 21, 22, 23  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Seattle Seahawks
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dools=hawks


Joined: 04 Mar 2008
Posts: 2696
Location: What's next?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

seaducks wrote:
Dools=hawks wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
I don't like individual D players. I dig this though
Dools=hawks wrote:

QB
RB
RB
WR
WR
TE
FLEX wr/rb/te
K
DST


yeah thats why i split them up. This is what I normally do ^^^ im game


looks good to me

also need to decide on scoring, if we want to do PPR, ect.


Depending on the site we can just go with the basics unless we do PPR(points per reception)
_________________
Go Hawks!

WINTER IS COMING
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
seaducks


Joined: 22 Jan 2011
Posts: 229
Location: Astoria, Oregon
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i love the standard scoring settings, and could care less if we add PPR in the mix, ill just wait and see what other people have to say about it
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SaveourSonics


Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45415
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm all for PPR. It balances out the weight receivers have with QB and RB.
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
imani


Moderator
Joined: 03 Mar 2009
Posts: 26452
Location: Harlem, NY
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 12:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tatupu_64 wrote:
I don't like individual D players. I dig this though
Dools=hawks wrote:

QB
RB
RB
WR
WR
TE
FLEX wr/rb/te
K
DST


yea, thats standard espn
_________________


wwhickok wrote:
I don't believe for one second that Seattle makes it out of their first playoff game.

Russell Wilson Fan since July 2012
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
klyon7634


Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 11423
Location: New York
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dools=hawks wrote:
seaducks wrote:
Dools=hawks wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
I don't like individual D players. I dig this though
Dools=hawks wrote:

QB
RB
RB
WR
WR
TE
FLEX wr/rb/te
K
DST


yeah thats why i split them up. This is what I normally do ^^^ im game


looks good to me

also need to decide on scoring, if we want to do PPR, ect.


Depending on the site we can just go with the basics unless we do PPR(points per reception)


That format looks good to me i also wanna do PPR
_________________


Seahawks~ Yankees~ Knicks~ Syracuse Orange


#JDI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheOsprey


Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 7630
Location: In a van, down by the river.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

- When do you think we should draft?

As close to the season as possible

- Should we draft on the site or at ESPN?

I've had drafts on ESPN, CBSsports, Myfantasyleague.com and a few others, so any one you guys pick is fine with me.

- I will throw the 12 current names into randomizer.com to determine the draft order. When do we want to make this official?

Anytime is o.k. with me.

- Does the majority prefer it to be a IDP, PPR, or any other funky acronym?

Whatever
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
TheOsprey


Joined: 27 Aug 2009
Posts: 7630
Location: In a van, down by the river.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are we gonna do a snake draft, where we draft from 1-12 and then go from the bottom up, from 12 back to 1?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 20600
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

imani wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
I don't like individual D players. I dig this though
Dools=hawks wrote:

QB
RB
RB
WR
WR
TE
FLEX wr/rb/te
K
DST


yea, thats standard espn
Not quite, flex doesn't include TE.


You guys like standard scoring?

I hate how there isn't bonuses for going over 100 yards receiving or rushing. I've always preferred that. Same with passing over 300.
_________________

^Rammy
Biggest Irvn, Michael, and ET Supporter

BlaqOptic wrote:
I'll put the 2013 Seahawks one spot over the 2008 Steelers on the Top 10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 20600
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

TheOsprey wrote:
Are we gonna do a snake draft, where we draft from 1-12 and then go from the bottom up, from 12 back to 1?
I'd say snake. There isn't a worst team yet considering this is our first year, so I don't see the point in rewarding someone too much for getting lucky.
_________________

^Rammy
Biggest Irvn, Michael, and ET Supporter

BlaqOptic wrote:
I'll put the 2013 Seahawks one spot over the 2008 Steelers on the Top 10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
klyon7634


Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 11423
Location: New York
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tatupu_64 wrote:
TheOsprey wrote:
Are we gonna do a snake draft, where we draft from 1-12 and then go from the bottom up, from 12 back to 1?
I'd say snake. There isn't a worst team yet considering this is our first year, so I don't see the point in rewarding someone too much for getting lucky.


yea snake draft is the only way to go
_________________


Seahawks~ Yankees~ Knicks~ Syracuse Orange


#JDI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
moomin


Joined: 21 Dec 2011
Posts: 79
Location: Spokane
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

- When do you think we should draft?

I'm down to do it anytime. Maybe just before preseason?

- Should we draft on the site or at ESPN?

ESPN, site would be cool but seems like itd take forever.

- I will throw the 12 current names into randomizer.com to determine the draft order. When do we want to make this official?

I'm free literally anytime to do it as long as i got a little forwarning

- Does the majority prefer it to be a IDP, PPR, or any other funky acronym?

down for whatever
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tatupu_64


Moderator
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 20600
Location: Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm really limited time wise Monday-Thursday. REALLY limited. Like from 5:30 pm to 8pm is the only time I could do one.
_________________

^Rammy
Biggest Irvn, Michael, and ET Supporter

BlaqOptic wrote:
I'll put the 2013 Seahawks one spot over the 2008 Steelers on the Top 10
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
imani


Moderator
Joined: 03 Mar 2009
Posts: 26452
Location: Harlem, NY
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 12:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

just put me down for whatever Laughing
_________________


wwhickok wrote:
I don't believe for one second that Seattle makes it out of their first playoff game.

Russell Wilson Fan since July 2012
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
SaveourSonics


Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 45415
Location: Sleepless in Seattle
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tatupu_64 wrote:
I hate how there isn't bonuses for going over 100 yards receiving or rushing. I've always preferred that. Same with passing over 300.


I'm fine with bonuses, but not that low. 300 passing yards is a walk in the park these days and 100 yards receiving/rushing isn't some great feat either. I think we need to bump those to 400 and 200 to make them true bonuses.
_________________
'
Richard D!ck Sherman 4 Prez
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
imani


Moderator
Joined: 03 Mar 2009
Posts: 26452
Location: Harlem, NY
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SaveourSonics wrote:
Tatupu_64 wrote:
I hate how there isn't bonuses for going over 100 yards receiving or rushing. I've always preferred that. Same with passing over 300.


I'm fine with bonuses, but not that low. 300 passing yards is a walk in the park these days and 100 yards receiving/rushing isn't some great feat either. I think we need to bump those to 400 and 200 to make them true bonuses.


it's should be 150 rushing yards, not 200. 200 rushing yards happens about 3-4 times a season, bonuses should be something you can strive for every game.

And 100 yards receiving isn't all that common either. I agree about the passing yards though
_________________


wwhickok wrote:
I don't believe for one second that Seattle makes it out of their first playoff game.

Russell Wilson Fan since July 2012
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic    FootballsFuture.com Forum Index -> Seattle Seahawks All times are GMT - 4 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 21, 22, 23  Next
Page 2 of 23

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group